User talk:Alon9393

Hi Alon9393! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2024 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. Marbe166 (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...and only simple citations should be used. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marbe166 ok. Alon9393 (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please pay more attention when you add people. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Akiva (Singer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Alon9393! Thanks for creating the article Akiva (singer), and improving my Draft:Akiva Turgeman. However, it looks like it was mostly unedited machine translation from its version on Hebrew Wikipedia.

This should generally not be done, per Help:Translation#Avoid unedited machine translations, as machine translation is usually inaccurate, especially in articles dealing with a lot of names, such as the one you edited. Especially if you do not know the language it is being translated to (I'm assuming you're not a native Igbo speaker), when you could end up with a lot of mistakes.

Regards Yeshivish613 (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Abdul Hannan (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alon9393. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Abdul Hannan (singer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alon9393. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alon9393|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 21:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that they are still doing it, such as here. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Abdul Hannan (Pakistani singer), give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Alon9393, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alon9393|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The result of @Liz, User:Davey2010, User:Saqib was to Keep, I think you yourself want that article not to exist, the article has independent sources such as The Times of India , The Rolling Stones, Red Bull among others, the musical artist was the most listened to on Spotify in 2023 and will surely be the most listened to in 2024 in India and Pakistan You must specify what else you want in that item. Alon9393 (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please submit it for review? I don’t believe the article meets the WP:NSINGER yet. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be rude but which part of "Not sure why you've canvassed me here but I have no interest in this article or the person so as such have no opinion on this nomination, Thanks" did you not understand ?,

I have no interest in Abdul Hannan or any of your AFDs or the subjects you're nominating so please stop pinging me, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 11:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Dclemens1971. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, User talk:Dclemens1971 Ok, but they are saying that I am a paid user which is totally false, they said it in Abdul Hannan (singer), that in some way is an attack on me, why do they continue to undermine my integrity my intention here is to help. Alon9393 (talk) 22:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not; the template says "gives the impression". I also don't see where you addressed the matter. Finally, the tag on the article was placed there by another editor. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies But that editor said in the AFD that I "am a paid contributor, which is false", look, these are a type of Ad hominem fallacies that are used to attack the person and not address the situation of the article, they are tricks to ruin my integrity. I will not continue. Alon9393 (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next time point in the right place then, please. You pointed at the article, which had a tag. In the AfD they utter a suspicion, which isn't totally unreasonable. You said "I am not a paying user", which I assume Saqib will understand as you saying you weren't paid to write it, and that's really the end of it, I hope. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies I make edits voluntarily, thank you for your advice and I left it explained in the 2 AFD of that singer. Thank Alon9393 (talk) 23:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helge Rasche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helge Rasche until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alon9393,

You're still a new editor on this project. I'd like you to slow down the rapid pace of your participation in AFD deletion discussions. Sometimes, you are commening in one AFD per minute which is not enough time to thoughtfully assess an article, using Wikipedia's notability standards, and evaluate sources.

I'd like you to participate in fewer discussions but, please, go deeper. Don't just review the nomination statement and glance at the article, do a deep dive and make a careful contribution to the deletion discussion. Also comments like "not encyclopedic" are not policy-based and really tell us nothing about the notability of the subject. Right now, I'm disregarding some of your comments because it appears that no time or effort were put into your assessments. Being a thoughtful participation in deletion discussions takes a thorough knowledge of policy and an understanding of a variety of different standards for notability on Wikipedia as well as a good understanding of how to correctly assess sources. Please only participate if you can spend appropriate level of effort to carefully assess an articl and whether it is suitable for a standalone article on this project.

If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can provide you with advice and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Hello, thanks for the guidance, I will try to slow down and follow the instructions. I wanted to ask you the following question, this article Abdul Hannan (singer) can be maintained, and if an agreement is not reached as it happens, which would be done at the entrance, I see it well and with notoriety as desired. Alon9393 (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're not WP:BE. Just a heads-up. Instead of moving drafts straight into the main namespace, it’s better to submit them for review first. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz sorry for the question, you just close the deletion query that I proposed and as a result of lack of consensus, which the result was to maintain because this user I don't wait for a reasonable amount of time to pass and I delete the article again, I just sent it to the draft, it's as if I didn't want the article with multiple sources and encyclopedic development, I didn't want it to exist Who makes the final decision in this case? Alon9393 (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saqib were not satisfied with the deletion query, well neither was I, but in this case where @Liz analyzed and gave its resolution, it should be respected, her decision was to keep, I do not understand why you are sending it again to the draft, why don't you open a deletion query would be the most logical thing to do, but don't keep saying that the article is promotional and that it doesn't meet the standards of a musical artist, because I don't see anyone else in that position, respect the decision made. Alon9393 (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you keep making new articles on the same topic, I'll keep sending them to drafts NS and imv, putting an article in draft is better than an AFD because it gives you a chance to fix it and get it approved. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Abdul Hannan (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Hello Saqib, Why do you think in every article on Pakistan that it should be deleted or moved to the draft even if it meets the Notability requirements? I'm very sorry, but you don't see yourself as a user who loves Pakistan, you oppose everything related to Pakistan, I suggest thinking more about how not to be so anti-Pakistani. greetings. Alon9393 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamy Jazz

Hello, Alon9393,

Again and again, you use the word "relevance" in your AFD comments and nominations. But I don't know what you mean by that term or how you are judging relevance, that's a subjective opinion and you won't find this word in our notability policies. Try to ground your arguments and nominations not on your personal opinion of an article but based on policies and guidelines on notability and sources. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest Alon, I'm a bit concerned that this stems from poor English skills. See another question from an editor here, as well as some by myself. We need to be able to understand everyone's communication in discussions, to ascertain that they understand the topics at hand. Geschichte (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geschichte Richard Jones has notoriety, as ambassador of the EU and Great Britain, he only needs expansionism and more reliable sources. Alon9393 (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also felt like it was a ad hominem attack! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, Geschichte In case you haven't noticed, provide, provide, add, include information in that article Richard Jones (British diplomat) duly referenced, you can also give your opinion in that AFD. I hope I have given some help. Alon9393 (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Hannan (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Hannan (singer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dclemens1971 I have to thank you for listening and for transferring the article to main entry after Saqib has called you out for doing so . I have to thank you and I apologize for my persistence, I am very sure that this article will be eliminated and I respect the community's decision, sorry for my English, I usually don't speak it much. --Alon9393 (talk) 02:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, the problem is not the Hassan article. The problem is that you continue to participate disruptively in AfDs after being warned many times. I hope you'll take a break, watch and learn instead of continuing to disrupt these discussions. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dclemens1971 but I don't think AFD is stopping AFD over 15 year old articles without references, I wish Hannan would also stay longer but that's not a sure thing, it's safer that they delete it in less than 7 days. --Alon9393 (talk) 02:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rafael Ferrer (artist), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article had a ref, at the bottom. I don't think "notoriety" means what you think it means. Articles are neuter gender not male. There is a process called WP:BEFORE which you should look at. Basically before nominating an article for lack of sources you should look for them yourself.

I would be grateful if you would withdraw this nomination.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces (Wikipedia) for disruptive editing related to the articles-for-deletion process, per WP:ANI#Disruptive editing and personal attack by Alon9393.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 17:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, per WP:ANI#Disruptive editing and personal attack by Alon9393.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alon9393 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I apologize for my disruptive attitude, I am calmer now, this is to inform you that I never want to return to Wikipedia, but I do not support the deletion of my articles since I was confused a moment, please keep my articles, and again no I give permission to delete my articles and contributions. Thank you. DMacks, GhostOfNoMeme , User talk:Star Mississippi , User talk:Left guide. Alon9393 (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. If you are never returning to Wikipedia, there is no need to do anything here. Your permission is not required to delete an article or page here; once you click Publish changes, the edit belongs to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, could you explain your removal of a large chunk of text from this article? An AfD is underway in which you participated, so I'm at a loss for why you would remove (sourced) content considering you !voted to keep. Thanks. GhostOfNoMeme 18:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GhostOfNoMeme They are my editions, I delete them and I don't want to be here EVER anymore. Alon9393 (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No editor has ownership of their published contributions. They don't "belong" to the contributor. Please see WP:OWN. GhostOfNoMeme 19:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE EVERYTHING OF MINE, DELETE MY CONTRIBUTIONS, I'M GETTING OUT OF THIS WIKIPEDIA BYE Alon9393 (talk) 18:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to leave, my CONTRIBUTIONS and my created pages are deleted, I don't want to leave anything, stop harassing me . Alon9393 (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You explicitly ceded your right to control your edits the instant you clicked "publish". DMacks (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the following message appears next to the "publish changes" button or the "reply" button: By clicking "Reply"(or publish changes), you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license. 331dot (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alon9393, I am sincerely sorry that the situation has come to this. I wish you had taken advice you had been given days ago. You probably would not have been blocked if you had chosen to work in other areas of the project other than AFDs. I don't think you understood our notability policy as well as you thought you did and it led you into trouble. I hope if you reconsider editing here, you can put together a thoughtful unblock request that outlines areas of the project that you would like to work in, hopefully, not administrative areas where one needs a thorough understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ortega (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Monophile (talk) 03:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 DMacks (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kfir Tsafrir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kfir Tsafrir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Monophile (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]