User talk:Bunnypranav
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
This is Bunnypranav's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For your in-depth set of eyes on Allbirds. Here's to you. Ornov Ganguly TALK 14:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
- @Oganguly Thanks a lot, appreciate it. Bunnypranav (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Judges pages
[edit]I removed those links due to the reconfiguring of List of United States federal judges by longevity of service as detailed here. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]Hi Bunnypranav. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 11:06, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Fastily,
- If a bot has posted a message on my talk page about a edit, or a archival notice, and the issue is fixed from my end, can I rollback that edit posting a msg on my talk page? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit