User talk:Captain Galaxy

Hi, if you are here to tell me about a BADNAC that I have caused, don't worry you're not the first. However you may want to know I don't attribute myself with any of the discussion pages not even in discussing anymore. So if you are here for those please feel free to revert any mistakes I may have caused without even noting me as I don't want to go back to discussion pages and screw up more for others. If you are here to contact me about other issues, I am active between 10:00 (UTC) and 22:00 (UTC). I archive this talk page after about a month or so.

Archives

1, 2

Do you have plans to nominate this for GA? From my small look through it's incredibly high quality and shouldn't be much work to get there. Panini! • 🥪 04:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Turbo Dismount, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Turbo Dismount released a playable web demo to stave off bankruptcy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Turbo Dismount. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Turbo Dismount), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Geno (Super Mario RPG). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Geno (Super Mario RPG), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite knowing of Geno's popularity, Super Mario RPG's co-director wasn't sure why the character was popular? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Geno (Super Mario RPG). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Geno (Super Mario RPG)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that an article for Pokémon Legends as a whole will be needed now, now that there are two games to that name? Visokor (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not right now. We've only just had a second game in the series announced and to create an article about a series, you'd need coverage/commentary on the overall series and not just individual entries. Maybe in the future when these games become more prevalent, who knows, I wouldn't mind being proven wrong here. CaptainGalaxy 17:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good day and fair tidings to you, sir! As a fellow WP:VG enthusiast, I had the opportunity to notice one of your contributions to a Nintendo-themed video game article, which included a then-newly added reference to a specific issue of the now-defunct video game magazine GamesTM (#144, released 2014-02-06). It just so happens that I am looking to get a hold of a retrospective article from that very same issue, albeit on a different topic, titled "Behind the Scenes: Elder Scrolls: Arena" (pp. 124-135). Therefore, I wonder if you would be willing to share scans of the feature (provided that you still possess the relevant journal). Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time. 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Electroguv (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Electroguv, thank you for reaching out. I'm afraid to say that I am currently not in possession of these scans as I was more just transcribing a review mentioned on Metacritic. However, I will be on the look out for this issue online to help out your cause. Hope you find this soon. CaptainGalaxy 14:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to say thanks for adding the source from The Verge detailing the lawsuit between Nintendo and the Yuzu team on the Citra page! I learned today that support for Citra had been taken down (10 after it happened), and The Verge article was incredibly helpful in understanding the reason behind it. Blahbalh999 (talk) 04:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for archiving URLs on Jade (Mortal Kombat), but I'm wondering if you do this manually or with a bot? Thanks. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 08:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I use the InternetArchiveBot to recover sources, which saves me a lot of time. CaptainGalaxy 13:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Pokémon films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoopa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mythical Pokémon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § Mythical Pokémon until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aquarium Arcade Title Screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cat Bird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite the titular character of the game Cat Bird being a hybrid of a cat and a bird, critics thought the character looked more like a bat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cat Bird (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cat Bird), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cat Bird you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cat Bird you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cat Bird and Talk:Cat Bird/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 05:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cat Bird you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cat Bird for comments about the article, and Talk:Cat Bird/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Geno (Super Mario RPG) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NatwonTSG2 -- NatwonTSG2 (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oatchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Escapist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you make a GIF (like the one seen in Cat Bird)? TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 23:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When adding a GIF onto Wikipedia, I typically get the gif file (either from a reliable source or from yourself) and run it through the website Ezgif. This website is useful for a few reasons. 1) You can convert videos into gifs just by uploading the video file, it's really easy. 2) Cropping the length of the gif, as typically with non free media gif, you don't want them to be long (around 5 seconds I think is the max though don't quote me on that). 3) Compressing is key here. Ezgif features a variety of tools in order to reduce the file size of the gif. Good tools to use would be Optimise and resize (speed also works if you aren't too fussed about the speed of the gif itself). This is important as you want the file to be small enough for DatBot not to notice, as for some reason when datbot tries to reduce the size, it breaks the gif entirely.

Hope this all helps and good luck to ya! CaptainGalaxy 00:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Celeste 64: Fragments of the Mountain, I felt like it deserved an article just after release but at the time enough sourcing didn't exist for GNG. So really appreciate you going back and making it. ― novov (t c) 10:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I had plans on making after I saw an editor friend of mine had it in their list of article ideas and thought I'd give it a shot. Glad you liked it. CaptainGalaxy 16:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Geno (Super Mario RPG) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geno (Super Mario RPG) for comments about the article, and Talk:Geno (Super Mario RPG)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NatwonTSG2 -- NatwonTSG2 (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Julia Chang. Although I'm not that knowledgeable about non-free material but I noticed some confusion and bold changes. Like removing these 3 non-free images. So in my opinion we should add her Tekken 4 design back into the article as it serves as a crucial part to her character design, such as glasses and other drastic changes that were implemented to make her unique looking, however, I'm not against the removal of other 2 non-free images that were in "Promotion and reception" section, so I would leave them as it is. Kazama16 (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kazama. So when I went ahead and implemented the changes that I did, I wanted to reduce the amount of non-free media as much as possible, mainly because non-free is stuff we try to avoid using when it is possible (most often the time for video games and characters, it is not). So my thought process was that it would be best to get rid of that didn't feel necessary, which were definitely the last 2 images), however I also felt like it would be best to get rid of the Tekken 4 image as well. I felt that was the best approach as yes, whilst it is a drastically different design, there isn't a lot of discussion about it. Comparatively, the Native American outfit is a major focal point of the article (including being mentioned in the prose/lead of the article), so I felt that that image was a worthwhile inclusion. Now with that being said, I wouldn't be opposed to having both designs in the article under one caption for comparison purposes (see: Template:Multiple image). Preferably there, you'd want to use one image that has both designs in it compared to using to two, but if there isn't one image I supposed two could work.

If you feel conflicted about anything I said here, I shall refer you to WT:VGCHAR where you can have a discussion about it there with other editors to get their take on things (hopefully ones that know more about Tekken than I do). With that, I hope you have great day! CaptainGalaxy 20:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Sword and Shield The Crown Tundra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Sword and Shield The Isle of Armor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delibird you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Delibird you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delibird for comments about the article, and Talk:Delibird/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Delibird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, despite Delibird being directly inspired by Santa Claus, TheGamer refused to give it the title of Christmas Pokémon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Delibird. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Delibird), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delibird, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delibird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi there! i recently edited your The Exit 8 article, removing a mention of a mechanic which i believe is not actually present in the game.

a couple of things before i explain further: i'm not really familiar with wikipedia editing, and i'm ESL (as you can tell by my IP address!)

so, the article mentions that the man who walks by the player on every loop acts as a timer, and if he reaches the end of the corridor before the player makes a choice, it will count as a fail state and reset you back to Exit 0, regardless of if your subsequent choice is actually correct. that's not true! i tested this in game, i waited for a long time after the man left the corridor, and then i made the correct choice (both cases, anomaly and non-anomaly), and the game did not set me back to Exit 0. i think the author of the source article just made a mistake assessing the mechanics of the game. i know of course that my own informal experiment is not a wikipedia-worthy source, and it's pretty hard to prove a negative, but i'll try! (using sources from the article)

- this article states that anomalies are "integrated in such a way that [...] demand players take their time and thoroughly examine everything"

- this review describes the game as sometimes comfy and relaxing, which wouldn't make sense if every loop had a strict time limit

- this guide makes no mention of such mechanic in its introductory section

anyway, that's all i had to say! i don't know why this detail bothered me so much, but i just had to see it get fixed, lol. i won't bother you with re-editing the article, i'm not trying to start a petty edit war.

have a nice day! 190.22.142.174 (talk) 03:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]