User talk:DimaG

Could you, pls, explain, what is wrong with Ghotit page? Tahnks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coroberti (talk • contribs) 20:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's spam in my opinion. Let's what other Wikipedians say, maybe I am wrong --DimaG (talk) 20:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People suffering from LD, like dyslexia and dysgraphia, can find the info they need. Have you looked in the references? Could you explain your position whithout stamps, like "spam", etc. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coroberti (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have learned the guidelines and corrected the page accordingly. Your specific and constructive criticism will be valued.--Coroberti (talk) 05:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heya. Just a note, looks like you didn't quite get the AfD right for Devin Taylor. You can see the procedure by going to WP:AFD, it just involves some templates, minor editing, and clicking about. I'll get this one taken care of for you. =^^= --Dennisthe2 01:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Untitled77.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, looks like you didn't quite get the AfD right for Brad Fuller YMP. You can see the procedure by going to WP:AFD. Dbromage [Talk] 07:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Victoria Bonya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FeralDruid 09:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rudazov Alexander requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FeralDruid 09:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alexander Rudasov, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alexander Rudasov seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alexander Rudasov, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 10:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments: How do you place a CSD tag--what code do you type in? Secondly, are CSD tags only applied to new articles like the one on Baljit that I just commented on. Cheers, Artene50 (talk) 01:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Humour sense has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple reasons: article reads as an essay; not clear what parts of article connect with the sources cited; no notable term "humour sense"; "sense of humour" already covered in a better way at humour. Also see consensus at Talk:Humour#Merger proposal.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 00:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you put that article up for deletion. Your reasoning "this article is just a list" is not sufficient or suitable enough reasoning to nominate the article for deletion. For future reference, when nominating something for deletion, give a brief reasoning as to why you are nominating such as "the information can be found on it's website" or something like that or whatever per the article you are nominating. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. By the way, why don't you have a user page? Bearian (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created the page with the name "Hub Surfing" with the intention to explain the situation with the people who use the Web only through P2P Hubs (Web sites for the download of films, software, music, etc.). d soThis trend is not yet accepted by other autority sources, and for that, and that is the reaso why you could not find the resources who verifies Hub Surfing term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragan Varagic (talk • contribs) 10:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]