User talk:DonCalo

Archives

/Images /Archive 2006 /Archive 2007 /Archive 2008 /Archive 2009 /Archive 2010 /Archive 2011 /Archive 2012 /Archive 2013 /Archive 2014 /Archive 2015 /Archive 2016 /Archive 2017 /Archive 2018 /Archive 2019 /Archive 2020 /Archive 2021 /Archive 2022

Dear Don Calo, I don't know if you are italian too. I'm an italian lawyer, Avv. Mattia Barbera registered in the Ordine degli Avvocati of Milan, I'm writing to you beacause my represented client found that a page created by you "Giovanni Bonomo" is in contrast with italian law. In particular it is considered criminal offense in italy to insist in reporting news about a certain guilty person when he is dead, like Giovanni Bonomo, if his heirs are still alive (it's called Diritto all'oblio). So I decided to contact you before any legal action, even if I received assignement to do it. I need, for my represented, that the page is not visible in italy. I would appreciate your kind and friendly help otherwise i will have to follow the rules of italian legislation. Please if you can answer me, even giving me suggestion on how to solve the issue without suiting anyone, also because times are very long if I have to suit a company from a different country like Wikipedia. I can wait 10 days from now. Best regards Milano, 5.1.2023 Avv. Mattia Barbera LawyerMattiaBarbera (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LawyerMattiaBarbera: That's a legal threat. I've reported it. Kleuske (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your addition to that article - I genuinely appreciate it! I've left a note in the edit history after I made some relatively minor changes. I'm not sure why my edits are messing up some of the links. My apologies! I think it's my browser. Carlp941 (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had not seen the explanation of your edit on the talk page, and some of it made sense, but I considered it a little bit too radical. But I see your point. Anyway, looks better now. DonCalo (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bernardo Mattarella (politician, born 1905).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough information to verify copyright status (specifically publication date), orphaned

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siderno stemma.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L'Asino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Caricature.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Cheney Train, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Hand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viterbo Trial (1911–1912), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laterza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aglieri arrest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 14:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calogero Vizzini face.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 19:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 1881–1896 cholera pandemic has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anísio Abraão David, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sicilian Mafia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DonCalo,

I see you have recently been participating in AFD discussions. However, your assessment of the article being discussed and its sources is very meager with comments like "Delete" or "Delete per nom". It would be helpful if you were more specific about how the sources either do or do not demonstrate notability of the article subject that shows you have thoroughly investigated the article and not just read the nomination statement. It's better to go deep on a few AFD discussions than to just say "Delete" on a dozen. It's the quality and depth of your participation that matters, not the number of discussions you participate in. Thank you for your help, we can always use editors who carefully and thoroughly evaluate articles that are being considered for deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 21:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pio La Torre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petralia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Salvatore Contorno.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 07:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You currently have a good article nomination waiting for review, but you haven't edited in a while. Are you still available to respond to a reviewer when the review begins, or should the nomination be reverted so you can renominate at a later date? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien Hi, I am rather busy in real life, but I am available for a review if we take it easy. Thanks. - DonCalo (talk) 05:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about changing the name, I thought it would sound better. I regret having done such now. I will not attempt to fight reverting the name whatsoever. One thing though, how is referring to it as the Jewish-American Mob derogatory? StarWarsFan501st (talk) 23:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm sorry that I didn't attempt to discuss changing the name at all. StarWarsFan501st (talk) 23:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Camorra

added a link pointing to John Dickie

Garduña

added a link pointing to John Dickie

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at L'Ordine Nuovo, you may be blocked from editing. W e go by what the source says, we don’t interpret it, that’s original research Doug Weller talk 16:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vincenzo Florio Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borgo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Languages of Italy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Βατο (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Giosue Gallucci you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Giosue Gallucci you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Giosue Gallucci for comments about the article, and Talk:Giosue Gallucci/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]