User talk:Dr.SunBD

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sena dynasty— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 07:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seuna (Yadava) dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Brahma-Kshatriya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

-- Ekdalian (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ekdalian. You have been adding or changing content in an article, Sen (surname), but you didn't provide a reliable source. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you have been informed earlier as well. Your talk page clearly shows that you have mostly engaged yourself in unconstructive edits. Moreover, your article on Brahma-Kshatriya does not have enough sources and citations, and has been moved to draftspace. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sen (surname); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 09:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 09:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• It's perfectly obvious per WP:DUCK that you created User:Cleanup 9060301 to continue your edit war at Sen (surname) and to attack and insult Ekdalian after this account had been warned. If you create further sockpuppets to deceive or mislead other editors, the next block will be longer. Please see WP:SOCK. Bishonen | tålk 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Dr.SunBD, thank you for your polite e-mail. I thought it looked very obvious that Cleanup 9060301 was your sock, especially from the page history here, but I have now inquired of a CheckUser, and know I was wrong. I should have had more faith in your good intentions! (That said, you ought not to have edit warred with Ekdalian, an experienced user who explained the problems with your edit in his edit summaries — again, see the page history.) Anyway, you have been unblocked, with my apologies. Bishonen | tålk 19:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

In spite of a clear message from a senior admin like Bishonen against edit warring, you have again come back with poor POV edits and tampering with the lead section of the article. Sorry, Bishonen for writing below your remarks; I found this to be the most relevant place to mention this. And Dr.SunBD, please have a look at your talk page before threatening me (on my talk page), all POV edits, my goodness!! I really wonder, are you here for any actual contribution at all? Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 19:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Some (deity). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chandra. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chandra. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kulinism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kulinism. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on INDEPENDENT71.COM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 07:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.SunBD

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged INDEPENDENT71.COM for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

David.moreno72 12:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on INDEPENDENT71.COM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Promo, no independent Reliable sources in the article which can establish notability of this article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. David.moreno72 12:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of online newspaper Bangladesh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brahma-Kshatriya, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.SunBD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brahma-Kshatriya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Medical degree, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery(B.A.M.S). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medicine and Surgery. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medicine and Surgery. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit [1] does not belong to the lead and is not properly sourced. It cannot stay as such. Please discuss if you think otherwise. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 09:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaidyabrahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dr.SunBD. Stop edit warring and inserting unsourced/poorly sourced edits in articles or you will be sanctioned. If you continue to edit the way you have been doing recently in Vaidyabrahmin, Vaid and Baidya, I will block you from editing altogether. Bishonen | tålk 13:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Dear user:Bihonen, Vaidyabrahmin(Physician Brahmin) have been given the highest status in the two main scriptures of Hinduism, the Vedas and the Mahabharata, respectively. But the priestly Brahmin community wrote some books against it. The complainant user:Ekdalian has unilaterally followed those books and carried out destructive articles. I urge you to look at the matter from a neutral point of view. Dr.SunBD (talk) 10:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that "pinging" me won't work if you spell my name wrong. I have already answered you on my own page, where you have posted the exact same note (which is kind of pointless; please reply on one page) plus one more note, which is possibly a slur against user:Ekdalian. Please come to my page and explain what you meant by it. Bishonen | tålk 11:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Eastern Chalukyas, you may be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 21:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to let you know I removed {{User:MiszaBot/config}} from your sandbox, to prevent it from appearing in Category:Pages where archive parameter is not a subpage. --rchard2scout (talk) 11:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dr. SunBD, I am Anirban Sen, my account name is Anirban Kolkata. I am delighted to see that you are fighting for the cause of Sen Brahmins. I have started a final work in Wikipedia to establish the truth of Sen surname in Wikipedia and the world. Please see the talk page of Sen surname. I have already started the work. Arnold Sir, administrator is helping my cause. My goal is to prove that Sen are priestly Brahmins and not Baidya Brahmins. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.SunBD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of online newspapers in Bangladesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dr.SunBD. Please stop edit warring at Vaidyabrahmin and attempting to insert poorly sourced material. As Ekdalian tells you at Talk:Vaidyabrahmin, you are not allowed to cite Sanskrit texts and interpret them yourself. And as he tells you in this edit summary, you're misrepresenting your own source by ignoring its footnote. I'll add from myself that a link to Google Books, such as you gave here, is a very poor, primitive source which is not acceptable in an encyclopedia. See Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes. You need to provide facts about the source — author, title, publisher, year of publication, and page you're referring to. See Help:Referencing for beginners. Note that readers do not all have access to the same parts of Google Books, depending on where in the world they live. Your editing, and especially your use of sources, is extremely problematic, and I'm afraid I'll have to block you if it doesn't improve. Note also that Wikipedia is not for caste glorification. Bishonen | tålk 08:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, I'm Drchriswilliams. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a WP:POV editor please think like a WP:NPOV. Is a bachelor degree and a doctoral degree equivalent? MD is using instead of MBBS in America or "followers of American system" countries.

4 types of degrees in education system.

1.Associate Degree 2.Bachelor Degree:MBBS 3.Master’s Degree 4.Doctoral Degree:MD So,MD degree is higher level degree than MBBS and using instead of MBBS but not equivalent!

       Dr.SunBD (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 16:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please note this reminder about community sanctions on caste related articles. In particular, note that this edit of yours is problematic. Ascribing motives to sources is not acceptable unless those motives have been detailed in other reliable sources. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, self-sourcing for birthdays such as the subject's twitter account is permitted as per wikipedia:BLPSPS, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kayastha (Profession). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kayastha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kayastha. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kayastha was a profession like technocracy in Hindu monarchy system, but this Kayastha is a caste! Dr.SunBD (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The main profession of the Kayastha caste was clerical working (writing, administration, ...). This is amply explained in the caste article. I can't find any reference to a different profession actually called "Kayastha" which is separate from this. Your article only states that it is a profession, without explaining what profession. I don't really understand your explanation, I have to say. Fram (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See here https://www.jstor.org/stable/44144743 Kayastha, Mahakayastha,Purokayastha (assistant of citycorporation(pur) Karana, Dharmadhakya,Mantri, Samanta, Mahasamantha etc are also professional tittle. Dr.SunBD (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, it was presumably a group of people with the same profession (writers) which evolved into the caste of writers. That seems to me something that belongs in the caste article, and not separately, as they are clearly closely related and the profession is only mentioned as such a few times in ancient texts anyway. Fram (talk) 14:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you're citing the Mahabharata and the Rig Vedas here. Please note that these do not qualify as reliable sources. As should be fairly obvious, translations of ancient texts are not reliable though scholarly interpretations are fine. Please stop doing that. If there is a pattern of your citing these translations in support of content added by you, you will be topic banned/blocked from editing in the caste space. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: There is a pattern. I already warned Dr.SunBD quite sharply about using the Mahabharata or the rig vedas as sources on 25 June,[2] which they are clearly ignoring. Their recent editing on Vaidya is enough, as far as I'm concerned. See block notice below. Bishonen | tålk 17:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi User:Bishonen&User:RegentsPark, Veda is the Head Religious text of Hinduism, Mahvarata is the second highest Respected epic text."Varnakular division" of Hinduism happens according to this text .So why these are not reliable ? I,think you are misguided by Use:Ekdalian and he is misleading you .But I think in this section we need a administrator who know better about Hinduism topic .If then he rejects my Veda and Mahabharata citations then block me for thousands of year I have no objection. Dr.SunBD (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for one month for persistent use of unreliable sources in the face of warnings, apparently for the purpose of caste promotion. Compare my note just above. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 17:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

You have made unsubstantiated without using any references [3]. These have been reverted. Chaipau (talk) 22:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Vaidyabrahmin. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Baidya. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Baidya. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ekdalian (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I've turned the article into a redirect to Baidya instead. Bishonen | tålk 08:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, I'm Hemanthah. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hemanthah (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.SunBD, removing appropriate content from a disambiguation page without explanation, as per the post above, is extremely disruptive. It is also disruptive to edit completely without edit summaries, which means that you basically never explain anything. You are close to being indefinitely blocked. To avoid this, start using edit summaries right now. See Help:Edit summary for explanations and advice. Also stop adding unsourced content, as here. And after all your disruptive editing at Vaidyabrahmin, I hope you're not even thinking about changing it back from a redirect. Bishonen | tålk 08:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I notice that just an hour after I warned you above against un-redirecting the non-viable POV fork Vaidyabrahmin, you tried an end run by recreating the article under a different name, Vaidya Brahman. That's the last straw. You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent disruptive editing and never-ending attempts to get round our rules. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 12:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]