User talk:Eversman

The Administators' incidents notice board has stated that many of your edits concerning religious status are are not in accordance with WP:BLP policy and you may be blocked if you continued to make these changes. It was also suggested that you not to continuously blank your talk page, showing good will towards other editors in the resolution process. You have continued to make religious status edits, [1] engaging in edit wars over the same questions. Please desist from controverting Wikipedia guidelines. Span (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Administators' incidents notice board has stated that adding categories are not in accordance with WP:BLP policy. Did I add any new category without reliable reference? NO, I did not. Did I add any new category on Gloria Estefan page? NO, I did not. So what is the problem here? And BTW on Johnathon Schaech page there are sources that claim he is Catholic, so who's edits now are not in accordance with BLP policy. --Eversman (talk) 07:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned on the Pierce Brosnan talk page, BLP Categories, lists and navigation templates states that we should mention personal faith or orientation only when "the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to his notable activities or public life". In "regard for the subject's privacy" references to his beliefs should be removed. BLP says they should be "removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". This holds for any and all BLPs. This is the problem as discussed on the incidents board. Span (talk) 03:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Johnathon Schaech says he was Catholic as a child. That has no bearing on adult belief or practice which is mentioned nowhere an is not relevant, as above. Span (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eversman. I am referring to your addition of a Roman Catholic category to Johnathon Schaech on the basis of your addition that he was "Raised as a Catholic" (through childhood). Yes, the source you added on October 8th is more specific as to his practice as an adult. Span (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Freiberger Molitvenik.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Radovan Fuchs, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you just participated in discussions on a closely related topic (also a current AfD re a Jewish list), which may raise some of the same issues, I'm simply mentioning that the following are currently ongoing: AfDs re lists of Jewish Nobel laureates, entertainers, inventors, actors, cartoonists, and heavy metal musicians. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Luciano Moše Prelević requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Empire3131 (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted my edits twice and one user:Dv.dina's edit. The correct names are Lubov and Rukshin. And TDT is wrong when it calls Lubov Ludmila. User:Dv.dina presented a link confirming "Lubov". Did you read his edit summary?. Before doing my edits, I checked names various ways including googling (Lubov, Rukshin). You may google Latin names. I did it too, of course. You seem to revert without any considering.--Sergei (talk) 22:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The source that you or your friend have provided can hardly be characterized as a reliable source by Wiki standards, it looks like a blog. Provide reliable source for your claims, if you are right, you shouldnt have any problems with providing a reliable one.--Eversman (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dv.dina is not my friend, Mr. Conspiracy Theorist. Some sources: [2], [3]. Or, even better, go to Gessen's book, search for "Lubov" (or for "Rukshin") in the search field on the left and see the results. Hope you won't revert these pieces of information any more.--Sergei (talk) 09:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was better to discuss this on the article's talk page first. I will try not to let this interfere our collegial relation as editors of Wikipedia. I think you could have had some more good faith in my edits, and I hope you will in the future. Regards, --biblbroks (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eversman, I saw you undid my edit without any reason. As he was born in Slovenia, I thought it would make sense to call him Slovenian (Sulic studied in Zagreb, yes, but also in Vienna and London). I later realized his parents are Croatian, but according this article, I think he has Slovenian and Croatian citizenship (or I can't tell if državljanstvom is better translated as "nationality"). So anyway, long story short, undoing of my edit was fine, but can you please leave a reason next, either on the article's talk page or in your edit summary? Edit summaries are regardless always a good idea, and in this case, just a few words explaining why you undid my edit would have saved me about fifteen minutes of digging through Croatian and Slovene news articles. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that news article! Cheers, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eversman, I gave a full edit summaries and links to the policy pages for the reasons I deleted the material at Duncan James. Perhaps you did not see them: "Remove unsourced cats. Rm unsourced info that is not covered by WP:EGRS. WP:EGRS and WP:BLPCAT say that information about a subject's sexuality should only be noted if it notable to their public life and that it is self-identified. There is no valid source given in this article for this. The Bisexual categories were also removed for this reason, as stated. Contributors making edits you may not like is not vandalism.Span (talk) 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please come visit the discussion at Talk:Stana_Katic.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries to fully explain your changes, deletions and reversions. Thank you. Span (talk) 07:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your comprehensive work on creating biographies of Jews of Croatia, I hereby award you The Original Barnstar. GregorB (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar for your relentless silent work to improve Wikipedia articles, especially those regarding people of Jewish descent.--Bbrezic (talk) 11:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded! As a token of my appreciation, I am granting you the "autopatrolled" userright. This signifies your new articles are of high enough quality not to need review by other editors; keep up the good work :) Ironholds (talk) 03:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never heard of this before and I don't think it's actually possible. This source you just added isn't working either, and it's not in the Internet Archive. --Ysangkok (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Alfred Pal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sušak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eva Grlić, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://notapawn4u.tripod.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please consider archiving nacional.hr references using WebCite or another similar service considering uncertainty regarding its future availability online. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Križevci Synagogue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hugo Ehrlich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edmund Moster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eversman,

the source you've cited used outdated info. The fact had been wrong by the time the source was published (2010), and it is still wrong. I happen to know the people involved personally, and I am reluctant to post details out of respect to their privacy. You are welcome to consider this claim to be original research and continue to leave the article as is, citing the fact I know to be wrong. I believe, however, it is better to remove it to follow the spirit of WP:Living, whether you consider D.T. tabloid or not. I'm not going to revert your edit myself.

BACbKA (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally, I had it re-read before even posting my original message to you in this thread. Have you (regarding tabloid journalism sources)? BACbKA (talk) 07:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. BACbKA (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Izidor Perera-Matić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obrovac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Zdenko Vinski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want it moved into your user space, let me know. It's best to create articles in user space and then move them out when they are ready. It saves everyone a lot of hassle. Peridon (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found the article on Oton Vinski interesting (thank you), and beefed up Zdenko Vinski. The A7 tag should never have been on it and has gone. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Izidor Perera-Matić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zlatko Bourek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Požega (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He said itself, here in this TV-Show...that his Paternal and Maternal Grandparents are from Bosnia. It is in Turkish language, but the Turks here who claimed that he is a Turk, please look and listen Kivanc's own Word's about his Family Background. Thank's. He is born and raised up in Turkey and he has the Turkish Citizen, yes but his Ancestors are Bosnian.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHW0JoEgvqE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.185.89 (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Gordan Lederer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

• File:Gordan Lederer.jpg
• File:Hugo Ehrlich.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to contribute something to wikipedia other than barely-notable Jewish Croats? ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.48.35 (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ignjat Fischer.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey there, my name is roee domany and i'm looking for information about robert domany's family. contect me: roeedo@gmail.com or here. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roeedo (talk • contribs) 22:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eversman. You started the article on Lavoslav Schwarz, and you mentionned he died in Zagreb. Later in the article, it is mentionned he died in Budapest. Can you check what's right ? --FLLL (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dom Lavoslava Schwartza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lea Deutsch (last known photo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Michel Nicollier 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Michel Nicollier 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Jean-Michel Nicollier 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not the primary means of visual identification as the article Jean-Michel Nicolier contains another photo of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Igor Kačić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Kačić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 21:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Igor Kačić.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Gazdic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Gazdic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PKT(alk) 00:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:English people of Croatian-Jewish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]