User talk:Guavabutter

Welcome!

Hello, Guavabutter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bkissin were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Africville. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In it's current, barely sourced form, it seems better to add as a section to the larger article on Africville as a neighbourhood. It's a good movie (I can't remember whether I've seen this one or one particularly about Eddie Carvery) and is probably mentioned in the scholarly discourse about both Africville and the Black Canadian community, so I'm sure other sources exist. If you can't find them, then it may be better off just merging into the larger article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remember Africville and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Remember Africville, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sophocles into Oedipus. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT use the {{lang-en}} template for translations; that's why there is {{translation}} (and the shorter {{trans}}). --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Moxy 🍁 21:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sigma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectral analysis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social psychology (sociology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Reference group into Types of Social Groups. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 05:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guru Nanak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian mythology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Elton John—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Materialscientist: May I ask why they did not seem constructive? I understand that since the page has been subject to vandalism (I realize you're not insinuating such here) all edits warrant being taken with a grain of salt. However, I argue that my edit, at the very least, contributed enough to not be reverted, in that it: (1) organized/re-worded some information for better effectiveness and reader-friendliness (e.g. breaking up info, dissolving the "Other" section and distributing its info under more relevant sections, etc.); and updated/fixed some citations. I hope such could be given additional consideration. Thanks! Guavabutter (talk) 03:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Guavabutter: Just came here after edits you made in Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. I'm not immediately seeing how the edit in Elton John wasn't constructive [1] I know Materialscientist is a recent changes patroller though, so it's possible that it was mistaken for vandalism. Materialscientist notes they have notifications turned off, so you might want to hit them up on their page to ask for further details. --Elephanthunter (talk) 18:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just want to say that it's nice to see a new face on Wikipedia. I like your contributions so far. Keep it up! --Elephanthunter (talk) 18:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States dollar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of the Treasury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Critical race theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is extensive and long-developed consensus at the Cultural Marxism redirect that it should be only a redirect to the conspiracy theory. You're certainly welcome to propose a change to this consensus, but you'll need to do so on the article talk page before removing the redirect. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guavabutter. Please go easy on the linking when you are editing articles like Notes From Underground. See WP:OVERLINKING. Harold the Sheep (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toponymy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		CopyEditor's BarnStar
		I award you this CopyEditor's BarnStar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. Thank you for your superb copy edits to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders!—  - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 08:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to join the Guild of Copy Editors. You got skills!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 08:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This edit violates German orthography. In German, nouns are always capitalized (it is Einbildungskraft, not einbildungskraft). Please also note that according to MOS:FORLANG: "Do not boldface foreign names not normally used in English." So Kritik der reinen Vernunft should not be boldfaced. --Omnipaedista (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dramaturgy (sociology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spies.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Template:Carl Jung sidebar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Deb (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr./Ms. Butter, if you would be so kind, please remember to leave an edit summary when saving your edits. It is quite helpful to others who watch those pages. --Midnightdreary (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden age of American animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Remember Africville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canadian Sociological Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of North America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Kar seva does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kar seva. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there is an Undo button, you can't just keep clicking it. Did you address the problems pointed out in the original revert? Do you have sources? Did you read the cited sources? Wikipedia is a public resource, and you have to repects the rules. You have already received a Discretionary sanctions notice above. Take this as a strong hint. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: Hello, the reason you stated for reverting my original edit was due to the lack of an edit summary. Heeding the issue you raised, I undid the revision to my edit and provided an edit summary, which seemed to be your only concern with my original edit; I did not "just keep clicking" the Undo button. If there is anything else, please advise. Otherwise, I do not understand your discontent. — Guavabutter (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the reason I stated was, "Modification of sourced content; generally unexplained edits". It was in my edit summary, which you haven't even bothered to read it seems. You have modified the existing content which was supported by a reliable source. You can't do that. Neither can you add your own WP:OR on the excuse that you are "expaining" things. You can only add content supported by reliable sources. If you write an edit summary saying your are "explaining", that does not make it ok. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minister of Culture, Heritage, Tourism and Sport (Manitoba), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister responsible for the Status of Women.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Winnipeg Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southwest Transitway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holon (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herbert Simon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edit to Sic semper tyrannis because it resulted in a sentence that didn't make sense: "Marcus Junius Brutus, who was present at Caesar's assassination of Julius." Be more careful next time please, and happy editing. GordonGlottal (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Incarceration in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asiatic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/copyright as well as several other websites that are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions.— Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Capital Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Surtees.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry colleague, I had to undo your merge, because these are completely different subjects despite the same name. In fact, I split the orifinal article in the first place. What is more, this subject seems to have low notability, because it looks more like a conspiracy theory, and the only independent ref comes from a website with strong indication this is a conspirologists' nest (and I found that some agree withe me ). The book is free to read, and frankly, it has LOTS of dubious places. For a while I thought the book itself is a hoax, but was lazy to deep further. Therefore I am quietly waiting somebody notices it and lists for AfD. (It was speedied once by a drive-by account who seems to know something, but the person did not press it harder.) Lembit Staan (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Fifth Estate (TV program), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Dragon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Hipal (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be far more careful with your choices of references, such as your use of CelebrityNetWorth (RSP entry) in Peter Nygård. --Hipal (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Moral panic

added a link pointing to Stanley Cohen

Rainbow Stage

added a link pointing to Bill Walker

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hipal, I appreciate the rules and completely understand the concern. I do not have a conflict of interest insofar as having a connection or affiliation to any article I've contributed to thus far. My activity on Wikipedia has only ever been a personal, voluntary hobby: I do not in any way hold a membership, employment, or any other contract/relationship with any person or organization whose article I have contributed to; I have not done anything on Wikipedia with the intention or for the purpose of promoting anyone or anything; and I have not received any compensation for anything I've done on Wikipedia. Thanks and enjoy your day! — Guavabutter (talk) 02:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Glad we have that out of the way.

The reason that I brought it up is your use of poor or promotional sources. If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. (WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.) If such sources cannot be found, the associated content most likely doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. --Hipal (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Shelby Tracy Tom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Vancouver.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful that you only add categories to articles when the categories actually exist: see WP:CatDD. You have created a lot of problems for other editors to clean up. Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: Hello, thanks for raising the concern. While I do add non-existent categories to pages with the intent to create that new category, I realize that I've ended up adding some undefined categories before without going on to create them. I will be more attentive to such issue in the future. Among the "lot of problems" I've caused, are there any specific ones that I can help with? Thanks --Guavabutter (talk) 00:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the offer to help; take a look at the 800+ categories on the curernt version of this special page and see if any of the not-yet emptied ones should have ther articles removed pending your category creations. Best, UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Manitoba by ethnic or national origin has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denison family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page York, Ontario.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Human rights courts based in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rural municipalities in Central Plains Region, Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rural municipalities in Eastman Region, Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rural municipalities in Interlake Region, Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rural municipalities in Parkland Region, Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Towns in Northern Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Fictional locations of Disney has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional places in Disney films has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Arts festivals in Canada in Prince Edward Island indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Manitoba radio station stubs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sukshinder Shinda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guavabutter,

Category redirects are not created in the same way as an article redirect. Please look at the code on this page so if you need to create another category redirect in the future, you are familiar with the template code that is used. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Thompson, Manitoba has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the cats to Nickle Lake. I removed the stub tag you added, though. Have a read at Wikipedia:Content assessment. A stub is "A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria." A start is "An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas." If anything, Nickle Lake is almost a C: "The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow." Also, when you do add a stub tag to an article, please hop on over to its talk page to change the class there too. Thanks and happy editting! Masterhatch (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, stub tags go at the very bottom of an article. I fixed it at Braddock Reservoir Have a read at MOS:ORDER. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're still putting the cats and stub tags in the wrong order, such as at Henday Converter Station and many other articles. Please have a look at MOS:ORDER and can you go back and fix them?. Thank you! Masterhatch (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Irving Group of Companies, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:ORDER (again). Please have a closer look at that. I fixed your cat placements at The Red Shoe and Scotties. Please be more mindful of where you place categories in the article. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional locations of Disney has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional places in Disney films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Resort destinations in Canada has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interlake-Gimli, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Selkirk (electoral district) and Portage la Prairie (electoral district).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I brought this to your attention a while ago but you still seem to be getting it wrong. Stub tags go below categories. But you keep putting the categories below the stub tags. I fixed some of them for you at SamiYoni, Poutchine au sac, and House dish. It says you're nitpicky on your user page so please see MOS:ORDER and make sure you put things in the right order. Masterhatch (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Masterhatch:, I typically edit using the visual editor where I place stubs as furthest to the end as possible. Guavabutter (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe using the visual editor isn't such a great idea when adding cats. I just fixed this one, which you had added the cat below the stub tags after your last response in this thread. Masterhatch (talk) 06:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I see you're still putting categories below the stub tags. Please stop. As I said before, if the issue is the visual editor, then maybe it's best to not use it when adding cats. I just fixed Dauphin River. Can you go back and fix the rest? Thank you! Masterhatch (talk) 03:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Masterhatch If categories were not meant to be used with the visual editor, then the option should not exist. This is an issue for Wikipedia to solve if it is an issue. I edit using the visual editor and add categories using the visual editor.

According to MOS:ORDER, "While categories are entered on the editing page ahead of stub templates, they appear on the visual page in a separate box after the stub templates. One of the reasons this happens is that every stub template generates a stub category, and those stub categories appear after the "main" categories. Another is that certain bots and scripts are set up to expect the categories, stubs and interlanguage links to appear in that order, and will reposition them if they don't. Therefore, any manual attempt to change the order is futile unless the bots and scripts are also altered." Guavabutter (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian families by ethnic or national origin has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Jinn (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
• An input request has been relisted to have more inputs about DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness at Talk:Jinn#Comparative mythology, Due, Fringe or Undue?.

This input request / intimation is made to you, looking at your previous contribution to the article Islam (Xtool) or talk page there of. Bookku (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Paterson GlobalFoods has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Craik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Ransom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about First Nations people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steinbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the page's history ([2]), it was you who made the main edit for this section back in September 2021. Thank you for this incredibly detailed edit (especially the table of projects by sector); the edit summary you put down, "Added some further information/content with references, as well as update to organization", doesn't do it justice.

—RZiman (talk) 22:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]