User talk:Jayab314

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jayab314.

This user is in school. This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. Although he may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for him may not be replied to for a while. He will be back on Wikipedia when school is over.

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Sending you this as well, thanks for all your help this Summer! Without your help the Love Island pages and BB(21) pages wouldn't be as developed! Looking forward to continue to work with you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had a little free time last night so as a little thanks for all the help I took care of something on your to-do list for you . TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDoctorWho: I've been planning to do it for a while now but never actually got enough time to sit down and do it. Thank you! Jayab314 00:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jayab314 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #27047 was submitted on Oct 08, 2019 21:42:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:The Circle UK flats.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN - 6th place in American Idol doesn't confer notability. Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catie Turner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Catie Turner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayab314! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jayab314! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 16:28, Friday, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Singing career doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catie Turner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Catie Turner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is IAmNothing712, admin of Survivor Wiki and handler of the Wiki's Twitter account. I won't say this anywhere else but here. I had a brief conversation with a cast member through Twitter regarding the unaired reward challenge. There are screenshots (link deleted because it has served its purpose). I trust that you wouldn't divulge his or her identity. Hopefully it's enough. Iankevinsevilla (talk) 01:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Island of the Idols, Controversy title cards.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, repeated 7 times.

I noticed that you requested a GAN for the article. I am quite hesitant about my work—i'm hesitant to publish such major changes to an article. I hope that's an attitude I will be able to improve in the future.

Wish both of us luck. I'll tag along with the GAN process. | abequinn^fourteen 02:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are ever hesitant in the future, always go to the talk page and ping a frequent editor of the page. Honestly, doing these types of edits on backgrounds and like the development process is needed for articles like this one.

I requested the GAN, and it might be a strech, but I hope it will be upgraded to GA. Jayab314 02:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheDoctorWho (talk) has given you a Turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

@TheDoctorWho: Thank you! Hope you had a great Thanksgiving! Jayab314 17:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:

Thanks for the article. You have to link it from 2019 Atlantic hurricane season#Tropical Storm Nestor now.

Pierre cb (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Circle US casting logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Conspiracy Collection, a makeup palette whose creation is profiled in The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star, sold out in 30 minutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh I need the info so just plz do it Funnynick2590 (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 👍 Funnynick2590 (talk) 02:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh I need the info so just please do it Funnynick2590 (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Funnynick2590: Sorry, can't do it tonight. I can try to make time tomorrow afternoon but it can never be guarenteed. All of the information I use is found here. Just look through the public advisories until you find what you need. Sorry I can't help anymore than that until tomorrow. Jayab314 02:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:The Circle US season 1, Final 5.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayab314,

Thank you for creating All the Freckles in the World.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work, but the plot is on the longer side for a plot section on a single film, especially since it is more than the rest of the article put together

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: Thanks for reviewing it! I went ahead and shortened the plot summary. Jayab314 00:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article All the Freckles in the World, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that All the Freckles in the World, a Mexican coming-of-age romantic comedy film, was released on Netflix after finding success in theaters in Mexico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/All the Freckles in the World. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, All the Freckles in the World), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:The Circle apartments.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Love Island USA 1 Finalists.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Circle Brazil casting logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw that you deleted Wie is de Mol? (Dutch season 8) recently.

I'm Dutch myself and I love Wie is de Mol. I want to document all the seasons of the show including future ones. You have done a great job on the season 8 article, and it would be such a waste to delete it, so I got the page restored. About it being irrelevant, I don't think so, since there are many other Dutch television shows with their seasons documented on Wikipedia (The Voice of Holland, Expeditie Robinson, Big Brother (Dutch TV series), etc.).

Please do not delete it again; it's a great article, I don't think it's irrelevant at all, and I'd like to document the entire series. - TheThomanski (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I saw that you have season 10 in one of your sandboxes. Is it okay if I (or you) published it? Thanks! - TheThomanski (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheThomanski: I deleted the original season 8 article because, when I first created it, I was pretty new to Wikipedia and didn't know what I was doing. The article does not use Template:Episode list (which would be better for the list of assignments), nor does it meet WP:MOSTV guidelines (see Background and production, Themes and analysis, Release, or Reception). Also there are not many publications or any type of source that I could find where it talk anything about season 8 of Wie is de Mol?. Adding on the fact that I have since become disinterested in the show, I decided to delete the article. You can certainly edit the current season 8 article to meet these guidelines and I will give you full permission to edit my sandbox for the season 10 article as well. If you need any help on figuring out how to make it meet the guidelines, you can always ask me here, but I do not plan on working on the Wie is de Mol? articles anymore. Jayab314 23:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder what’s matter with Fire tokens. How come you don’t like the topic of Fire Tokens on Survivor: Winners At War page. Where is the agreement of “no fire token topic” on this page, most of all, WHY??? OSO202 (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love Island (American season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Love Island (American season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Love Island (American season 1) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Love Island (American season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Love Island (American season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users have said it is not a reliable source for the information, see Template talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/United States medical cases by state and reliable sources noticeboard discussion. Thanks for your contributions but we have to make sure we're only listing confirmed cases according to the health departments. buidhe 22:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayab314. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Love Island (American season 1) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Virginia says that numbers greater than seventy/70 should be expressed in text? I'm sure you're probably right but MOS:NUMERAL states that:

Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred). When written as words, numbers from 21 to 99 are hyphenated (including when part of a larger number): fifty-six or fifty-six thousand but five hundred or five thousand.

There's probably some MOS guideline I'm not aware of, if you wouldn't mind posting that here, I want to know. Love learning new things around WP. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 17:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shearonink: I have no idea why I said 70, but Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Numbers states that Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words. With the number 3645 right next to it, it makes sense to state it as "3645 confirmed cases and 75 deaths" instead of "3645 confirmed cases and seventy-five deaths".

Generally, I like to write numbers written out, but having two numbers like this in a sentence, with one being greater than one thousand, it makes sense to keep them both numerical. Jayab314 17:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personal preference then. That's cool and I don't mind one way or the other very much - both being numbers makes sense. Heh, there are so many rules/guidelines around here I thought I had missed one. Which does happen occasionally - Shearonink (talk) 17:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I adjusted the code you placed into 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Virginia. The previous placement was messing me up on updating the County/City table. If you feel it's needful to have the note in that efn, I'm fine with discussing it on the article talk page. Just wanted you to know I changed it and why. Shearonink (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Big Brother 21 (American season) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Circle (American season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 04:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Big Brother 21 (American season) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Big Brother 21 (American season) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Circle (American season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Circle (American season 1) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayab314. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Jayab314; in addition to copy-editing the article, I've removed some of the less-relevant material and rearranged much of the remaining text—particularly in the "The Conspiracy Collection" section. I invite you to review the major changes I made today here. Cheers, and good luck with your planned GA nomination. Baffle☿gab 07:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed your revert of my edit to COVID-19 pandemic in Virginia. So far, I’ve had three editors agree with me on changing the wording. I didn’t realize at first that there was a template specifically for disease outbreaks, so now I’m discussing it on the template’s talk page. I’m mostly a medical contributor to Wikipedia, and I take issue with the term “Official website” being used to refer to an outbreak itself, rather than a government response. So, I’m inviting you to join the discussion. I won’t revert your revert. — Tartan357  ^(Talk) 12:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jayab314, just in case you're not seeing the pings from the reviewer, your lack of response has your two GA nominations on the verge of being failed:

• Talk:Big Brother 21 (American season)/GA1
• Talk:The Circle (American season 1)/GA1

If you are still interested in pursuing this nominations, please respond right away. Indeed, if you aren't, it would be courteous to let the reviewer know that as soon as possible. You have been editing elsewhere on Wikipedia recently, so do give this some priority. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Big Brother 21 (American season) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Big Brother 21 (American season) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Circle (American season 1) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Circle (American season 1) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jayab314 great work on Love Island (American season 1) and Big Brother 21 (American season)! I noticed the GA nom for BB21 failed recently but no big deal! I was wondering if you have time if you could summarize the reception section in the lead a bit more while I work on finishing cleaning up the references. I currently have the first 116 references cleaned up but I have to take periodic breaks because Wayback Machine times me out after so many searches. Once we get these two things checked off we can re-nominate this article. If you want once we get BB21 passed I can help out with The Circle (American season 1). Let me know what you think. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 04:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winston Hines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Hines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jayab314: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]