User talk:Jedi Striker

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nice with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 05:07, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Characters in the Inheritance Trilogy. For example, if you corrected a spelling mistake, noticed something wrong with the format, added a section to the article, or voiced your opinion in a discussion, please tell us in the space provided. It makes all our jobs much easier. Thank you. Grey Maiden ^talk 05:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Power Rangers: RPM! Unfortunately, it's not something we can include just yet. As PR fans, we know darn well that, generally, all Ranger colors will be brought to the US without fail (at most, extra Rangers might be added, but none will ever be unused unless they're Sentai movie-only). But WP:V doesn't allow information like that to be added to an article until it can be completely proved we're getting those colors here and that Disney won't change anything... which means waiting until the Jetix website goes up (probably around Nov/Dec sometime) or promos start airing (same). All we could list right now is the fact that a Red Ranger is confirmed, since an image of him was at the Toy Fair during summer. Arrowned (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, color correlations are not sourceable information, and should be thrown out as useless bits of trivia.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you find vandalism, go to the page history of the vandalised article and revert it to an earlier version, rather than just removing the text as you did at Elijah Wood. The anonymous editor who vandalised the article also removed legitimate text while adding the vandalism, which you didn't put back. I've cleaned it all up, but remember to revert vandalism in the future rather than just removing it. Graham87 07:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jedi Striker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 389 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. J. J. Perry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Lestat (musical), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WrestleMania 29 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
a extended amount of time. In the end, Triple H performed a Pedigree on Lesnar on the steel step,) and got him down for a 3 count.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hell in a Cell (2013) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Cody Rhodes]] and [[Goldust]] defeated [[Seth Rollins]] and [[Roman Reigns]] of [[The Shield]]) to win the [[WWE Tag Team Championship]]. The next week, Rollins and Reigns fought [[The Usos]]
• no contest due to Rhodes and Goldust (who was on commentary during this match) fighting a taunting [[Dean Ambrose. All three teams were inserted, making it a triple threat match, by [[Triple H]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you seem to be a good editor. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the Skogssamer article that I have created. For any improvements that you can find. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Calling All Angels. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 23:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Where did I put anything defamatory? Jedi Striker (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Wagner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As other users pointed, the promotion changed the name to WWE years ago. It's not World Wrestling Entertainment anymore. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Judging that you help out on the wrestling articles around here, I would like to invite you to watchlist WT:PW. That is where centralised discussion for professional wrestling articles take place. You will also want to check out and watchlist WP:PW/RS and Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Article alerts. Happy editing. StaticVapor message me! 08:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brock Lesnar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 18:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Hardy Boyz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 19:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jon Moxley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 02:46, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japheth, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eden and Stephen Schwartz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content which gives undue weight to some statement about a living person, as you did at Anna Jay. On Wikipedia we take particular care over articles about living people.

New information, even if referenced, should be added only if noteworthy, relevant and documented in multiple reliable third-party sources. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and material should not be added if it is only gossip or has little longer-term importance, or if the only sourcing is tabloid journalism.

If challenged, the onus is on the editor who adds the content to justify its retention. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 04:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This same info and reference was on Jungle Boy’s article, so I did not see any reason not to add it to Anna Jay’s. All wrestling couples have each other’s significant other’s listed on their articles. Jedi Striker (talk) 04:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw you added the summary for Jon Moxley vs. Bryan Danielson, and each sentence, you would say "[date] episode of Dynamite". You only need to add Dynamite on the first mention. Those others, it's understood that it's talking about the same show. The only time you would need to mention Dynamite again is if Rampage or a PPV was mentioned and we need to differentiate the shows. JDC808 ♫ 05:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AEWxNJPW: Forbidden Door, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desperado.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wrestle Kingdom 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Desperado.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there may be a misunderstanding of what a lead is. I've seen you do this on event articles as well, but you remove information from the lead because its "repeating" information that's already in the article. The lead is a summary of the article. Your argument that it's repeating information would mean we should have no lead at all because that's what the lead does: it summarizes (i.e., repeats) information from the article.

Statistically, most readers do not make it past the lead. Telling a reader who the current champion is but not telling them when and from whom they won the title (which would tell them how long they've been champion) makes no sense. Also, just because some articles do something one way does not mean every article has to (although I would counter that the articles you're referring to need updated). JDC808 ♫ 23:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolution (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Keith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jedi Striker. Please do not simply add bare URLs. These are lazy references and subject to linkrot. Templates such as {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} should be used. 183.171.120.3 (talk) 12:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Three Musketeers: One For All, All For One!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]