User talk:Lzdimitar

Hello, Lzdimitar. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 22:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)~. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lzdimitar. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given this edit, I will be kind this time and place this note rather than directly reporting you at WP:ANI. This is serious. You've been blocked in the past for adding unsourced content into articles, and you seemingly haven't learnt about it. This is your last warning.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I advised you in the message on your IP talk page, you as an editor are blocked and cannot edit under any IP or account until such a time that you are able to address concerns raised regarding your editing (or a period of one month, whichever occurs first). A copy of that block message is included below for your reference as it applies here as well:

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. You know that your edits are contentious, having had your main account blocked for it, as well as this IP, and yet you continue to plod away making the same unsourced changes and challenged edits (at times evading your block to do so). Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project - you need to be willing to discuss your edits when others bring concerns to the table. You are blocked from editing for one month; this means you cannot edit using any IP or your registered account. In order to be unblocked you will need to convince an administrator that you are willing to discuss your edits when concerns are raised and perhaps be willing to seek a mentor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you were willing to communicate with other editors and use article and user talk pages to discuss issues and changes you would likely have a much rewarding experience as an editor. This is, at least, your sixth block. If you cannot take this time to find a way to learn how to edit collaboratively you will likely find yourself indefinitely blocked. Isn't it worth the time and effort to at least make an effort at communicating? --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for logging out and using your IP to edit disruptively by adding unsourced content to articles. I have therefore blocked the IP for three months as well as your main account for the same duration. All of the information and advice I provided in my previous block message above, as well as the follow-up note, still apply. Either there is some language barrier that prevents you from communicating with other editors and understanding the problems with your edits as presented by concerned editors, or you are actively ignoring them. Neither scenario forgives your completely disregard for policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the flights can be booked on Royal Air Maroc website for this Im not add source. Before this edit I create new page with official source you can view and I thing is not correct with 10 symbols to be punished for 3 months... Lzdimitar (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You are editing via your IP as well, and it is those edits that are an issue. You as an editor are blocked for three months, regardless of whether you log in to edit. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok I understand but i really love to edit and maintains some articles like Sofia Airport and more. From now on I will stick to the rules and will inquire for edits. Please only time to be reduced. Regards ! :)

Decline reason:

Here's how this works: you stop disrupting Wikipedia for a while, say at least a month, then you ask for the time to be reduced because you have shown you have the self control to just accept that you are blocked for being disruptive. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been told several times not to add unsourced content. I'm posting below a brief list of your recent edits where you did the opposite, ignoring all the warnings above:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]
• [5]

--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. After many previous blocks (the last one for three months), there is no way you can deny that you are aware that you're expected to include your sources when changing article content. As no finite block has made any impression on you, this block is of an indefinite duration, that is you are blocked until you are able to convince an administrator that you understand why you are blocked and explain how you will address the issues that have led to your multiple blocks. You have previously evaded your blocks via IP - this is strictly disallowed; you cannot edit via any IP or account while this block remains in place. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wind Rose Aviation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Can my block to be remove. I understand where I wrong also I want to edited only bulgarian airports pages because have many informarion for updates. Thanks !

Decline reason:

Given the extent of your bock log, I think you need to go into more detail about where you went wrong. PhilKnight (talk) 01:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will add only correct information with official sources or when I add don`t have official information I will write to admin for discussion. Lzdimitar (talk)

Please include a decline or accept reason.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello ! Can my block to be removed. I understand where I wrong. If you removed my block I will add only official and correct information with official sources or when I don`t have any official information I will write to admin for discussion. I will be focus to edited only pages of bulgarian airports and airlines because in the moment this pages is not updates and is added incomplete information ! Thanks and regards ! Lzdimitar (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I feel like this is a WP:COMPETENCE issue here with regard to the ability to communicate and understand. only (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The article Brussels Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skyairlines.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brussels Boulevard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brussels Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bulgarian Air Charter (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aviostart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see evidence that this is a notable business, meeting either WP:GNG or WP:CORP. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aviostart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviostart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulgarian Air Charter destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian Air Charter destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cargoair 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Bulgaria Air charter destinations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has had only WP:PRIMARY ref since 2012 and has been tagged for four months. It fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTGUIDE and especially WP:INDISCRIMINATE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]