User talk:Pandacat21

@Pandacat21: Sorry for my mistake, by misunderstood it's happened, really felt sorry for my mistake. I got confused with another article. I felt sorry again. Dhaneesh 💙 Ram 15:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...now I understand what happened. It's alright. :) Thanks for the telling me Pandacat21 (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pandacat21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Freddie Fox (actor) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Freddie Fox (actor) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://tennant05.tripod.com/2009/id169.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freddie Fox (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord Goring. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Brühl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Next Door.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Well done on your huge improvements at Daniel Brühl. Now 60% of the text! [1] Martinevans123 (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 😇😇 It's my joy to help expand Daniel Bruhl's wikipedia page as he deserves it. Danke! Pandacat21 (talk) 09:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see and read MOS:OVERLINK, MOS:MAJORWORK, and MOS:ITALICWEBSITE. I was going through your good article nominations of Daniel Brühl and Josh O'Connor and noticed that they could both be improved by using these MoS guidelines. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for reviewing! I'll work on it right away. Pandacat21 (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Daniel Bruhl: -removed overlinks -italicized websites, newspapers, and magazines  Done Josh O'Connor: -removed overlinks -italicized websites, newspapers, and magazines

Pandacat21 (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Cox (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rob Roy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Josh O'Connor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Olivaw-Daneel -- Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daniel Brühl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Brühl you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Daniel Brühl for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Josh O'Connor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Josh O'Connor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Olivaw-Daneel -- Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Freddie Fox (actor) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 07:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Josh O'Connor you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Josh O'Connor for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Olivaw-Daneel -- Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 07:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Freddie Fox (actor) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Freddie Fox (actor) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Freddie Fox (actor) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Freddie Fox (actor) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 23:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]