User talk:PoetVeches

Welcome!

Hello, PoetVeches, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 12:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Help:Getting started, "Help:Editing" in Wikibooks https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Help:Editing - this is also useful links for learning how to edit Wikitext. PoetVeches (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PoetVeches! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Alek Dzhabrailov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 23:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

//In fact, I was in rush just to watch how the Wiki Editing working, because it was my first experience, so the page was very raw.

Hi PoetVeches! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:42, Monday, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

First, note, unlike PoetVeches, I use a letter "i" in the word "editing". Second, PoetVeches might like to consider that his/her own concession of no better than "intermediate" English capability ought to be the source of circumspection in launching into editing forays whose objective is purported improvements to expression, grammar and/or punctuation. Then again, perhaps PoetVeches might not. This editor, for one, lives in hope. sirlanz 00:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• sirlanz, I have no idea what you are trying to say. PoetVeches, whatever sirlanz was doing in Alex Chow, it wasn't vandalism. Y'all try using the talk page, and tone down your syntax and diction for the sake of intelligibility. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herta Müller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liu Xia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Frances Hooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://research.frick.org/directoryweb/browserecord2.php?-action=browse&-recid=7316. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PoetVeches. I see you're kind of new here. I'm dropping a couple of navboxes into this section that you might find helpful. I'm not sure how much longevity the library requires before they request individual editor subscription access to our library partners, but it can't hurt to try. I just used Newspapers.com subscription access on Frances Hooper, and I find that source very helpful in my editing. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took a quick look at the English Voice of America. Many of the images there come from other sources. They put the initials of the source in the bottom right hand corner of the image. The image of the demonstrators we are talking about at the Teahouse has VOA in that corner, indicating that they produced (or purchased or otherwise own) the image. Hope this helps. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@StarryGrandma: Thanks a lot again for your participation in that question. Yeas, this is all awfully interesting for me, because i recently started to study how to work on computer and registered on wiki. --PoetVeches (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2014 isn't later than 2015.Xx236 (talk) 07:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Xx236: Yes, that's right! This excerpt about Liu Xia is really started by me. Thank You for help. Are You interested to write about Herta Muller and Liu Xia? You can easy work with it while studying the topic and adding new info. PoetVeches (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PoetVeches. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PoetVeches! You created a thread called Wikipedia:Attack page An attack page is a page, in any namespace, that exists primarily to disparage or threaten its subject at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The book contains original research, not backed up by any other sources. See "Antisemitism in the Soviet Union", USSR only opposed Zionist Jews which is far more political as it created shadow/parallel society which functions similar to Nazism (see Zionism) and conflicts with equality defined by socialist doctrine, Traditional Judaism was not affected. 87.79.191.114 (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 87.79.191.114 Where I can see "Antisemitism in the Soviet Union"? Before deleting you first have to explain where is the "Antisemitism in the Soviet Union" located on Talk:Jedwabne pogrom, so other people can see, you need to call the title "Antisemitism in the Soviet Union", but also author, and page in the book. You will be obviously blocked from editing Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Blocking policy) if not stop the practice of deleting sourced texts first time for 3 hours, then for day, et cetera. If you mean "Antisemitism in the Soviet Union" as just article on Wikipedia (Antisemitism in the Soviet Union), there is a rule that Wikipedia articles cannot be considered as source, because, you see, the Wikipedia is just what we, usual people write, this cannot be the source for citing (see Wikipedia:Verifiability#Wikipedia and sources that mirror or use it), so you have to call some published book or newspaper (at least title and author), for example "American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called Huckleberry Finn, bla-bla-bla..." (Ernest Hemingway, Green Hills of Africa p. 102), in all, like that. Good luck. Ask me also or Wikipedia:Teahouse if there will be difficulties in editing. PoetVeches (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PoetVeches,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Snickers2686 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Santiago Enriquez, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Snickers2686}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Snickers2686 (talk) 03:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank You, @Snickers2686:, for your attention and work with reviewing wikipedia. I will try to better the concerned article and also wrote there on Talk:Santiago Enriquez re issues. PoetVeches (talk) 18:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition of an etymology to Irish backstop, primarily because it is not a neologism and so does not need an explanation other than is readily provided by Wiktionary or other dictionary. Furthermore, to position a section on etymology at the top of the article is unfriendly to most readers. Finally, the style of English you use (lack of definite articles, etc) is not appropriate for this topic, per WP:ENGVAR. (I noticed that the expected style had not been specified in the article, it is now).

I have provided the intent of your edit by using a wiktionary box that links to the definition. --Red King (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, baseball evolved from rounders! --Red King (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Red King:That's OK. I am so badly speak English, so for me it is just some sort of non serious learning English keyboard. Yet, I saw rounders on YouTube :) PoetVeches (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yulia Yuzik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Yuzik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Galia Ackerman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 00:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:IVD GIF.gif

Happy International Volunteer Day. Every Wikipedians are volunteers and you deserve this recognition. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Abishe (talk) 05:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tag surname pages as "orphans". There is almost always no need for them to be linked from any other page. Thanks. PamD 23:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: Ok PoetVeches (talk) 23:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PoetVeches! You created a thread called Double redirect at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Galia Ackerman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PoetVeches!

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed Zangezi. Thanks for creating this very interesting article! Mccapra (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Reymond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coronavirus disease COVID-19 in Russian nursing homes for the elderly and disabled is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coronavirus disease COVID-19 in Russian nursing homes for the elderly and disabled until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 18:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe: :May you call clear what was your criteria for nomination (spam, lack of source, not notable), because when You say: it's not necessity for such articles, but it's not criteria. Thank you ahead for your response anyway. I will be busy next month and unable to take part in the discussion. To say true I am bit tired, and need a rest I written the article at once in two languages. Best wishes. I appreciate truly the work you doing, it's must be so boring, but all and I enjoy Wikipedia and I have to say thank you :) PoetVeches (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just Afded the article as I noticed there weren't any articles for other countries related to COVID-19 pandemic in nursing homes. I appreciate your work in the article though but I think it is suitable to merge your article to Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term care facilities under Russia section. The Afd consensus will be reached generally in a week but this one might take 2 weeks at least because fellow Wikipedians have different opinions about the article in their perspective. Happy editing and I hope you got enough clarification about it. Abishe (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe: To say true, when you didn't clear call Reasons for deletion, I wanted to use Wikipedia:Removing administrator rights procedure for you, but ″Wikipedia:Removing administrator rights″ has so vague rules, in fact, there said, that it was only once a history, and, in fact, it's impossible, — so I decided to say let it be how it may be and I go to drink tea for a month or two. Really, all about it (abuse of Russian Government to fire care home personnel and poor conditions of care homes) was published on BBC, so if Wikipedia bans this or deletes, the actual information will be still present on BBC. But for me was interesting about this deletion procedure, to find answer: may censorship run on Wikipedia or not? And I see on this short study, that censorship may run and very easy on Wikipedia. PoetVeches (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PoetVeches! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, May you join voting to save new article about situation with disabled rights in Russia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PoetVeches! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I ask on Tea House if I think administrator abuse his office? Or it will be canvassing?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PoetVeches, you left two pieces of 'advice' at my talkpage (edits, including one of my responses, here). Unfortunately, it's bad advice. I told you there that there is no reason to not include ISSN, as well as explaining that it is not the same thing as ISBN, yet you responded with a largely unintelligible message telling me to only use title and url in citations. This is wrong. Please stop, learn some more about citation templates. You also acknowledged in both comments that I could use ISSN if I wanted, but you thought it was unnecessary: this means that your comments were utterly pointless, saying 'you can do that but I think it's too much effort'. Why would you bother to put in the effort to leave me a pointless message then?

As I replied to you both times, I am quite an experienced editor and know how useful various cite parameters are, you don't need to try and school me, BUT if you give this kind of bad advice to new editors, they may follow it, creating bare refs rather than filling in useful details or using simple tools to create refs. I suggested you not give advice in my first reply, yet you continued both unnecessarily and with even worse advice, so I have to more forcefully suggest PLEASE STOP until you actually know what you're talking about. Kingsif (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Kingsif: Excuse me if I bother you, really, just wanted to say about my point of view on the sense for what is needed citations, sort of about written in Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation style. Very appreciate your opinion, thank you. I have still weak English language, that is probably why nobody wants to speak with me about citation style :) So, I keep silent and go back to English text books to better my English :) PoetVeches (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've decided to revert your recent edit [1] on Instant camera as I don't really think the picture you added fits with the article (as that camera doesn't use self-developing film, in my opinion, it's not really a precursor to the others). I'm happy to discuss this if you disagree as per WP:BRD. GoodCrossing (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodCrossing: To say true I just learned how to upload image from Library of Congress on Wikimedia Commons, then added the uploaded image just for curiosity sake, so may be you right, so it's all good. PoetVeches (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]