User talk:RahulChawla1990

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 01:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Apologies for the template but you really should use the talk page of an article when you make wholesale edits and find yourself repeatedly reverted. I suggest you make your case at Talk:Surya Siddhanta (perhaps in chunks) and get consensus. You should read up WP:CONSENSUS, WP:V and WP:RS, all important policies that will help you better understand how to edit productively here. Thanks and best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 01:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. regentspark (comment) 02:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RahulChawla1990, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gurnidar is my house mate, why dont you answer to the questions he asked you.? Or I asked you for that matter, Looks like NPOV is invalidating your forceful arguments. I had already gotten sick of Wikipedians teaming to harras individuals but Gurnidar wanted to make a point and well I guess he did. Propaganda artists are sitting on wikipedia to control the information. I dont really care anymore dont want to waste my time with FRAUDS.--RahulChawla1990 (talk) 00:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]