User talk:Rebecca.colvin

Welcome!

Hello, Rebecca.colvin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shadowjams (talk) 09:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rebecca! Thankyou for your new stubs on protected areas. Can you take some advice though. See how Léfini Faunal Reserve is formatted. Please make sure your new articles have categories like this. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I welcome you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Protected areas task force a project I started tow years ago. We could sure use some active editors building content on here. Please respond to my messages Rebecca!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speak to me!!! LOL. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your excellent and extensive contributions. Two recommendations:

• please bold the name of the protected area in each article, and wikify a bit where possible, e.g. link the country name
• please add {{africa-protected-area-stub}} to the end

It's better to create better articles a bit more slowly than to create lots of incomplete ones quickly. I did the above two steps on several of your first articles: over to you. :-) Empty Buffer (talk) 13:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you respond to people who are doing their best to help you?? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rebecca. The name of the article seems to be incomplete or incorrect. Do you write about East Nimba Nature Reserve? See also Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve. Best. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ebo Wildlife Reserve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. /HeyMid (contributions) 15:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sankan Biriwa (Tingi Hills) No Or Non Hunting Forest Reserve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance. Checked source and nothing notable was found

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to have new articles saved rather than speedily deleted:

• WP:N
• WP:V
• WP:RS
• WP:NOT

and good examples of article in the same category - as to why they are ok - they have project tags on the talk pages, they have categories SatuSuro 10:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for all the articles you are creating on African reserves, it is really adding to the knowledge base. But please, although it's formal name is the United Republic of Tanzania, just calling it Tanzania will do. By the same reasoning the category most of these articles belongs to is Category:Protected areas of Tanzania not Category:Protected areas of the United Republic of Tanzania.

If you want to use the full name then in English grammar it's normal to use United Republic of Tanzania not Tanzania, United Republic of. NtheP (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conversely, the category for the Central African Republic is at Category:Protected areas of the Central African Republic, not "Protected areas of Central African Republic". What's important to understand on Wikipedia is that articles are not allowed to sit around with categories on them that don't already exist — if you save an article and one or more of the category names appears in red, then you need to find out whether the category is named something else instead. You can't just leave it with a red category on it. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Digya National Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bejinhan talks 06:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beki Bosse Matie Classified Forest has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ngel Nyaki Forest Reserve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/JTFE/article/view/571/149. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]