User talk:RoryS89

Since they don't understand what Jesusfreakhideout is, I'll have your article restored to my userspace. It is definitely worth having in here. I'll help you develop the article so that it will be kept.

Also, I caught your edits to the Skillet article. You did a very good job on the article, except that you included talk about how great their live show is. That violates the WP:NPOV (Neutral Point of View} guideline. Please read the guideline. Anyhow, I see great potential in your work. I urge you to consider joining me WikiProject Contemporary Christian Music. We can always use some help! Royalbroil ^T : C 13:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had it restored to my userspace. You can find it here until I have developed it. Royalbroil ^T : C 16:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the comfusion. I added the article to the mainspace since my last post. You can find it here: Jesus Freak Hideout. Royalbroil ^T : C 21:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Agnes (band), an article you created, for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Agnes (band) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 19:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Just expand it sooner than later SatuSuro 02:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added 2 references to the article. I had added comments for you about notability and verifyability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes (band). You can request an admin to restore the article to your userspace if it doesn't survive the afd, so that you can expand it later. You would need to make sure that it will survive a future afd before you place it back in to article space. That's what I did for Jesus Freak Hideout. Now there are almost 150 articles linking to that article! Royalbroil ^T : C 03:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is mentioning the Japanese spelling of Relient K on the page wrong?

I think it is useful information, and it is worth mentioning. 63.229.88.169 03:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to respond on your page, so I'll do it here. Some of us don't have the ability with our computer to read the Japanese words, so that's why I removed it. I didn't think it said anything. Sorry if I offended you. It was not intended. God Bless.RoryS89 23:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)RoryS89[reply]

No offense taken. I just got confuzzled on why it was removed lol. God Bless you too dude. 63.229.88.169 09:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just looking over some of the pages I usually keep an eye on and have started noticing that fan sites are popping up more and more on artist pages. Is this a legitimate reference source to have an article linked to? Ldstryfe

I don't see how I can post on your discussion page, so I will do it right here. I'm not sure what articles you are referring to, but considering how many fansites have grown into something big, I think they are legitimate. The ones I would think of using are ones that have interviewed the artists/bands themselves, so I think that makes it all count.RoryS89 00:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)RoryS89[reply]

Hello RoryS89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Relient K - 5 Score And Seven Years Ago.jpg) was found at the following location: User:RoryS89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoryS89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RelientKMmhmm.jpg) was found at the following location: User:RoryS89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoryS89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RelientKRelientK.jpg) was found at the following location: User:RoryS89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoryS89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RelientKTheAnatomyoftheTongeinCheek.jpg) was found at the following location: User:RoryS89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoryS89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RKTwoLefts.jpg) was found at the following location: User:RoryS89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ben_Kasica.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Dave_Douglas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:EarlyYearsEP.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:House_of_Heroes_1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:John_Cooper.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Kutless,_Live_From_Portland.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:MRHN.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Matt_Thiessen_Pic.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 11:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Tim_Skipper.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:House_of_Heroes_1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 20:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Inhale_Exhale.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 21:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Brian_Pittman.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 21:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded at Image talk:Brian Pittman.jpg. Basically, our fair use arguments falls under "we should able to use this copyrighted image of him since free image of him is unavailable." With someone who's alive and just normally out there, that argument is a little thin. Have you considered asking the band if they are ok with an image of them (probably one from their website) being used? See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Dave_Douglas.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 20:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed sourcing the article. I went through 50 pages of links in google. Luckily I found that they won a major award on about the 40th page, else I would have doubted their notability too. In the future I think you should be certain that you have numerous reliable sources BEFORE you start an article. I won't start an article without numerous reliable sources. There are several very notable racers from the 1980s that I haven't started articles on yet because I can't find numerous reliable sources. One won 7 major off-road racing national championships. Royalbroil 16:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rory, just so you know, I changed my name from DJREJECTED to GoDawgs. So if you see anything made by me on the Relient K articles you'll know it's me and not someone trying to cause edit wars.

Hey Rory, if you want to add some things to the Relient K to do list, feel free to do so. I know you are very active with these articles, as I have edited with you a bunch of times. -- GoDawgs 01:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RK to-do can be located here Talk:Relient_K/to_do, you can also edit it on the talk page. -- GoDawgs 04:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eleventyseven1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was no assertion of notability in the article. As you may imagine, lots of articles about lots of bands get put on WP; we're an encyclopedia not an advertising or promotion venue. Myspace, which apparently this band is well aware of, is the perfect place for their article. We do have articles about notable bands: they must meet the criteria in WP:BAND, does eleventyseven meet those criteria. Can you write the article that has reliable indpendent sources, like newspapers, television or radio reporting about the band to show their notability? Have books been written about them? those could be cited too. If not, you should wait until Eleventyseven becomes notable enough that they do get the press coverage and books and then write an article about them. Carlossuarez46 19:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Those websites are not reliable independent sources; they apparently appear on Myspace, a far more popular website, but that too doesn't make them notable. If they're as big as claimed, why have they garnered no attention from newspapers or music magazines? Most newspapers have both a religion section and a "style/culture" section which would cover this genre of music. Carlossuarez46 20:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Eleventyseven, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 16:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eleventyseven doesn't appear, so far, to meet the requirements of WP:BAND. If ever they do, an article will most certainly be made about them. Meanwhile, you can look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleventyseven and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleventyseven (2nd nomination) for more information. -WarthogDemon 23:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Ace_T.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Chapstick1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest, quite seriously, make such a template. The marvel films are all united for a different reason. All the films there are from the newer produ tion series, all united under a similar production theme and style. if there were only Timm/Dini DC films, then adding them would make more sense, as they'd represent a similar theme and design. Given the variety seen in DC's films, I think they'd be better served on their own, esp. as it's likely that 'The Batman' franchie will continue to produce more DTV films. You've got a great deal of the work already completed, and can (and possibly should, for unity of design) easily copy the DC film template andjsut patch in the animation in place of the live actions. ThuranX 20:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to look it over before it 'goes live', make it in a sandbox from your user page, then leave me a talk page message with a link , when it's ready. As for the Nolan animated Batman, (for lack of a better term), I'd suggest perhaps a Batman movie Franchise category, and put it there, its article should make clear the connection. ThuranX 20:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HOH2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering why you expanded the section on Dave Douglas leaving Relient K, with the quote, and almost direct quote from the press release that was on Jesusfreakhidout.com. I personally think the section was served better when it was condensed, and we used our own words, instead of a press release. Not saying you did anything wrong, I am just asking why. Flap Jackson 19:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Matt_Hoopes.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 04:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ryan Shrout, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ryan Shrout. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Derek Mount, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated your Relient K-related article for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Relient K albums. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you. —ScouterSig 03:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it didn't have a reliable source; namely, one that wasn't hosted by a RK blog. The article needs one from a recording company or a musical review. But more importantly, it was an album that isn't released yet, only announced. Wikipedia has strong policy on things that don't exist yet, if you want to look at them. Thanks. —ScouterSig 14:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The other link was not so much a blog, it was Relient K's official news page. And there are many pages for things that have not come out yet, though they have links, I know.RoryS89 (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)RoryS89[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MattandGirlSoccer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:My Girlfriend 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pressing On 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RelientkMHDSR.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article My Red Hot Nightmare, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Small local band, no sign of notability nor any claim of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fences and windows (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Best Thing 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Who I Am 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoryS89! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 338 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Nathan Young - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Daniel Spencer (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RK Karaoke.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Devastation and Reform has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Christian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Spencer (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Burkum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]