User talk:Sun Sunris

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you recently removed content from Four-dimensional space without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 08:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Four color theorem, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that there is nothing strange about the thing that you removed here. - DVdm (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Little Rocky Run requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unnotable neighborhood.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheAwesomeHwyh (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have moved your article to your userspace as linked above because it is not ready for mainspace as it needs references to coverage in reliable sources as well as more content, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Zerometer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Zerometer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GhostOrchid35 (talk) 23:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Zerometer, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. 331dot (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AZERTY, you may be blocked from editing. (I couldn't find a Twinkle template for nonsensical Speedy Deletion tagging, so...) Thegreatluigi (talk) 04:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m so sorry about the many disruptive edits I stopped doing about a month ago. Sun Sunris (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Sun Sunris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb03 (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT?! MY OWN PAGE?! NEEEVVVVVVEEEERRR!!!!! Sun Sunris (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with User:Sun Sunris. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Kb03 (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sun Sunris, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! TonyBallioni (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Karrie Delaney article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! GirthSummit _(blether) 17:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been around for a while, so I'm going to add a personal message as well as the template above - you know better than to describe someone as 'totally awesome' in an article, and I don't think you need me to tell you why not - although if I'm wrong about that, by all means drop me a note on my talk page and I'll explain. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My original name was Sun_Sunris, but at the time I did not know that this counted as a space. Now my name is Sun Sunris. You can still call me Sun Sunris, but I just wanted to let you know. Sun Sunris (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read MOS:QUOTEMARKS. Also it is obvious that when we say a hard g as an gift we mean without the t. It is standard to assume the reader knows which portion of the word it is supposed to sound like when giving that sort of example. It's as in the word gift - it's plain what that means. —DIYeditor (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ROBLOX: The Movie, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why can’t this page stay on Wikipedia? Sun Sunris (talk) 13:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sun Sunris. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Space Case (Novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t even know that that still existed! Okay. I’ll see what I can do. Alright. Sun Sunris (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following isn't really an appropriate post the TPG, because it isn't about the TPG. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC) -- Disambiguation --[reply]

I have my own little disambiguation page right here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sun_Sunris#If_this_page_is_a_tree,_then_these_are_the_branches

Sun Sunris (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RIP Sun Sunris: September 9, 2018- February 23, 2019 Sun Sunris (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:En-us-Deoxyribonucleic acid.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:En-Guernsey.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:En-us-NASDAQ.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Sv-Carl von Linné.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s been more than a year since my block, and I finally feel I’m ready to have an official unblock in place. Sun Sunris (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sun Sunris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that I was socking and deserve this block. I was also vandalizing Wikipedia so I got blocked. I hope I am ready to do better on Wikipedia! Sun Sunris (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC) TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT I understand that I was sockpuppeting. I know I was also vandalizing some articles. I understand that this behavior is not allowed according to WP:VND and WP:SOCK. I deserved this block, and now I hope for it to be over. There have been multiple times (none of which I remember exactly) where I saw a page that could use improving, but I couldn’t because I am blocked. I really regret this block and hope it will not continue. Hopefully I am ready to return to Wikipedia! Sun Sunris (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welp, I guess we should start with a Checkuser needed

Please describe what you did to merit a block and what you will do differently. Please describe what constructive edits you would make.Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser returns no results; IP is probably dynamic, not a proxy, no obvious block evasion. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deactivated the cu template per Yunshui. Mz7 (talk) 11:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I move this under March? Sun Sunris (talk) 22:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sun Sunris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. It has been a long time since I have logged into Wikipedia. I would like to be unblocked. I understand that I was blocked for sockpuppetry and vandalism. I have changed a lot in the past year-and-a-half, and I have grown. I know not to vandalise or sockpuppet any more, and I get that I am not allowed to do so to not hurt Wikipedia. I will try my best to follow all guidelines on Wikipedia to the best of my abilities. Sun Sunris (talk) 02:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, per below. SQL^{Query me!} 17:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have evaded the block 32 times editing logged out, most in the second half of this year. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair enough. Sun Sunris (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sun Sunris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. It’s been a long time since I’ve edited Wikipedia. I remember that I sockpuppeted and vandalised a few years ago. I also edited while logged-out in 2020. I can assure you that I am here to make constructive edits from now on. I have specifically avoided editing Wikipedia while logged out last year and this year. And, although they weren’t allowed, I’m fairly sure the edits I made while logged-out in 2020 were constructive, since I am here now only to make constructive edits. Please consider my request, and thank you. Sun Sunris (talk) 22:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'd like you to prove that you can make constructive edits to Wikipedia. Please read through our core content policies, how to cite sources, and this guide. Using this knowledge, please propose a constructive edit here on your talk page. It could be as simple as suggesting a fact that could be included in an article about your favorite video game or film, backed up with a citation to a reliable source. The proposed edit should be something that can be copied verbatim into an encyclopedia article. You can immediately make another unblock request with your response. Don't copy-paste a Wikipedia article to your talk page, and don't use complex markup, like tables. The point is to add encyclopedic content, not to make some table have pretty colors – and reading complex markup is not fun. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sun Sunris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I was told to create a sentence that could be added to a Wikipedia article, to prove that I can edit constructively. Here is a potential addition to the Overview > Events section of the Roblox article, although I wouldn’t technically be able to add it, since, as of the last time I checked, it requires me to be extended-confirmed. In May 2021, Roblox partnered with Gucci to create the “Gucci Garden” event and release exclusive virtual items. ^[1] Please let me know if this is good, and thank you again. Sun Sunris (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked per below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TechCrunch isn't really the highest quality source, but it's at least in the "debatable" category, which is light-years better than what I usually get in response. @AmandaNP: what do you think? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Inclined to unblock, if it's OK with @AmandaNP: Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I haven't read through anything, but @Deepfriedokra: I won't object to an unblock especially given the amount of time since the initial block. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:17, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @NinjaRobotPirate: What say ye?Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I was willing to unblock earlier, but I guess this got lost in the queue. Done. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks so much! Sun Sunris (talk) 09:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @ Deepfridokra. Talk to me. I am an all time blocked user whose written words each time get deleted. Help me if you can and help me if you can't. 49.35.133.138 (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you post this on my talk page? Sun Sunris (talk) 23:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]