User talk:Tholden28

Welcome!

Hello, Tholden28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gran² 16:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MacKay likes the picture that is currently on his article. I can understand why people like you you want to make him look bad, but take you hatred for him elsewhere than Wikipedia! The photo in the sidebox is here to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.78.19 (talk) 11:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about your anti-Mackay edits. They are not welcome on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.78.19 (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, 70.48.78.19, that seems like a pretty aggressive attitude. It almost seems as if you are threatening User:Tholden28. I'm going to look within the rules to see if that is grounds for WP:BLOCK. Bkissin (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Tholden28. I wanted to apologize for asking you to find another source about Cotler's announcement he wouldn't run again. I had not heard this new development, and the last I had heard, he was intending to run again, at least that's what was assumed in the uproar over the polling calls in his riding. Perhaps I may have let my own personal politics cause a knee-jerk reaction to the edit, and for that, I'm sorry.

Thanks for finding a more up-to-date article, though. Bkissin (talk) 22:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing sources from the provincial riding articles? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 15:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just because other article don't have them is no reason to remove them from these articles. I consider it an improvement. All riding articles should be so comprehensive. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 15:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind the formatting changes, but please leave the notes in place. They place changes in members in historical context. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a significant contributor to article United States presidential election, 2016, your participation in this discussion would be appreciated and helpful.--JayJasper (talk) 05:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloc Québécois leadership election, 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaudreuil-Soulanges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberal Party of Canada leadership election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerry Byrne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcel Tremblay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Democratic Party leadership elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosemary Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberal Party of Canada leadership election, 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Etobicoke Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of House members of the 41st Parliament of Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to New Democratic Party, Jack Harris (politician), Sean Casey, Kitchener—Waterloo and Medicine Hat (electoral district)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edmonton West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion on this here. - Nbpolitico (talk) 23:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you can show that the four people elected last night have been sworn in as members of parliament, then you can add the categories and templates stating that. I believe they have not been sworn in yet, so they are not yet MPs. prove me wrong if you can, and if you can't, then please stop adding incorrect information to Wikipedia. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 16:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No affiliation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tholden28, You may not be aware of this, so please read Unacceptable reversions. All of us editors should be courteous and respectful to one another (particularly to those who are much more experienced and to those who are inexperienced). I'm not going to fight you on this (...this time). --Musdan77 (talk) 05:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know the Liberals won the election, but since Couillard hasn't become premier yet, is it fair to say he got 'elected' on the article right now? I'm not going to take it down, but I was just wondering... -- Kndimov (talk) 02:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just realized this wasn't you, but the person in between your edits. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder to wait until the media have declared somebody elected. Manon Massé has an extremely narrow lead right now, but with two boxes still out — and guess what those boxes are? the advance vote — it's not at all safe for us to assume she's going to win yet. We don't make our own predictions by looking at who's in the lead at some indeterminate point in time; we wait until an external source has declared them the victor. Bearcat (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like both of us were writting a summary for the Quebec election intro at the same time. Since you got yours in first, I'll get rid of mine and merge anything that's worth merging. Redverton (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note - it isn't the PQ's worst seat showing since 1976. The PQ got just 23 seats in 1985, and 29 seats in 1989. But it is indeed the second-worst vote showing since 1970. Redverton (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Nationale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tholden28,

As a fellow regular contributor to opinion polls sections on various Canadian election pages, would you care to weigh in on this debate over whether to show "all voters" or "likely voters" results for polls in the ongoing Ontario election? Cheers. -Undermedia (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tholden28. Rather than revert, I'm just wondering what the justification is for adding the Green Party of Manitoba to the infobox for 41st Manitoba general election, being that it wasn't done for past elections. Initially, I wondered if they were doing particularly well in the polls, but it seems there's only one to go on, hence why I'm curious. Thanks, Graham11 (talk) 03:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, completely missed the fact that it was in the infobox already. But thanks for the informative response! Graham11 (talk) 19:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heya. Just wanted to say thanks for adding all those decent photos of late to a variety of political articles. For one thing, I was pretty tired of seeing that old grainy image of Preston Manning - nice to finally have a couple of decent photos. Good job. Redverton (talk) 02:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saturday Night Live (season 40) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is a little premature to have an article for a season that has not started. Maybe when it is sooner then it can be created, but right now there seems to be no notable information. On WP:TVEP, it states "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," which this has not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SAJ (T) 01:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 42nd Ontario general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Conservatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent dispute about the "assumed office" date on Arnold Chan, I just wanted to confirm that your understanding is correct — we do indeed use the date of the election or byelection itself, since that's the date that Parliament's website gives. But I just wanted to let you know that if you ever get involved in a similar dispute again, you don't need to rely on the purely anecdotal evidence of what we did for John Dahmer — there's actually an explicit consensus statement, already written at Wikipedia:CANSTYLE#Terms in office, which completely backs you up on it. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- Wikipedical (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please know that I have reverted your move of 41st Quebec Legislature. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It looks like you created a number of articles for the future Canadian ridings (including University—Rosedale). I wonder as to why you would use "—" vs. "-" (em-dash vs. regular dash) in the name of the new ridings? I recognize the fact that Elections Canada report seems to be using em-dashes as well. But I feel it is somehow a violation of WP:TSC or general English rules for em-dash. What do you think? --Truther2012 (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for response. Btw, it has been explained to me as per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(Canada-related_articles)#Ridings --Truther2012 (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add Doug Ford to the list of candidates until he's listed on the site — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.85.105 (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that for example on the byelections article, you keep saying the "party's" - the party's what? Unless you actually mean to say "parties", which is the plural form of "party"? GBC (talk) 02:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the twenty-third of October, Mr. Fortin spoke the first time as the leader of Forces et Démocratie around 10:45am about the happened attack in Ottawa. That's also the first time the colour of his renewed "MP box" (you know, every time a MP speak, there's a box showing his/her name, the riding he/she represent also the party he/she belongs) revealed and it sort of green. I just wonder should the colour representing Forces et Démocratie change from blue to green? Merci—An Macanese 09:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for a late reply however I think there is a more specific proof what is the colour Forces et Démocratie chose. See the official seating plan of the house of commons of Canada. I personally believe that the colour representing Forces et Démocratie should be green (is it MediumSeaGreen #3CB371 ?) since it was adopted by the hoc. Merci—An Macanese 15:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks of your speedy reply. Well, I'm kind of puzzled if you say so. The colour of a party's logo may vary (I mean the accurate HEX) and how about those independent members? I think we should follow the hoc because the parliament have to get the approval from the party to use certain colour and it is the best way to know what one's party have decided their official colour beside informing the party directly.Merci—An Macanese 17:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW on the official page, the CPC uses #002395, NDP uses #FF5800, LPC uses #ED2E38, BQ uses #0088CE, GP uses #427730, Forces et Démocratie uses #01AF58 while those independent MPs get #606860.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits about Thibeault being an independent when he resigned. I too saw it on his Parliament bio, but without it appearing on the Parliament standings, and third party coverage, it could just be a website glitch or error. I think it is best that Thibeault be reported as resigning as an NDP. 117Avenue (talk) 03:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is objecting to your sandboxes. Wikipedia:Help_desk#Pages_on_non-existent_DVD_releases -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Night Live 40th Anniversary Special, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leslie Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ForcesDemocratie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 11:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Vaudreuil-Soulanges (electoral district) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Vaudreuil—Soulanges. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- 04:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.32.190 (talk)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to comment at the various already open move discussions, to actually move the pages in the proper procedural manner, such as at Talk:Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher , Talk:Lévis—Bellechasse , Talk:Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour , Talk:Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tholden28!

Thanks for your edit on By-elections to the 42nd Canadian Parliament. I definitely understand your logic in removing the hidden section about Ottawa-Vanier, but I wanted to discuss it nevertheless. With M. Belanger's ALS further progressing, if he hasn't given the indication he will resign, I assumed he would end up dying in office and that we should be prepared for that eventuality.

I know that is morbid and slightly disrespectful, but it would have us prepared for this situation. Your thoughts? Bkissin (talk) 18:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Strength in Democracy MPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you recently removed content from Template:Current Members of the Canadian House of Commons without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 15:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, warning redacted. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 15:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing this dispute over the Alberta election infobox, I started up a discussion on the talk page about it. Am messaging other editors involved so we can hopefully avoid an edit war! 88.215.17.228 (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tholben,

You know those remaining 386 Looney Tunes Cartoons which don’t have volumes in the Golden Collection?

I was wondering if you could create some brand new volumes for the Collection so every cartoon would be featured.

Does that sound like a plan? Evelynkwapong539 (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Bloc Québécois leadership election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Bloc Québécois leadership election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In FPTP elections where the leader is not the incumbent for the seat he is running, in, consensus is to add "Ran in". Do not remove it. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quebec lieutenant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The map you added under the infobox for the 2019 Canadian federal election has been replaced bu a worse map that is inconsistent with all previous elections. There is voting in the talk page regarding which map should be used. Please vote and make your voice heard on this matter. Spaceshuttlediscovery (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to 2020 Green Party of Canada leadership election does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you recently added Maslany's denial. It was reverted. I recently added it as well and it was reverted. I don't know how many other times this has happened. However, there is a discussion about this on the talk page and oddly enough I am the only one who has advocated for her denial to be included. Even after three of us agreed on his this could be included it was reverted again. The other editors are adamant about keeping it off. They have an understandable argument. If you like, you can participate on the talk page. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Tholden28/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 18:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Tholden28/sandbox. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 20:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 2019 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021 Canadian federal election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2003 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Graham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the extra wording you removed around PSPP's riding was supposed to indicate that like with Duhaime, PSPP had no seat before the election. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Quebec Liberal Party leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page André Fortin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]