User talk:Vistor

Welcome!

Hello, Vistor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 09:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Magnus Tappert. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vistor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 297 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Lorenz-Günther Köstner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Roald Poulsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Frank Pagelsdorf - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Klaus Berge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Bjarne Pettersson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Johnny Petersen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Thomas Abel (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Benny Johansen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Jørgen E. Larsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Viggo Jensen (football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Vistor! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. In your recent edits, I believe you've got some details wrong: Åge Hareide is the manager, and Josep Clotet Ruiz is the coach of Viking FK, just like Ole Gunnar Solskjær is the manager and Mark Dempsey is the coach of Molde FK. Or have you some read some news that I didn't? Mentoz86 (talk) 22:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to this Her er den nye Viking-treneren the edits are right. In the Scandinavian countries the football clubs distinguish between the general manger (buying and selling players) and the head coach (in charge during games) --Vistor (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In that article it says that Clotet is the new coach (trener), while Hareide changes job from head coach (hovedtrener) to manager. I haven't heard the term "general manager" used in Norwegian football clubs, but I know that the head coaches in Norway is normally in charge of transfers, matches and trainings. Viking and Molde have adopted the English manager-system, with a coach is in charge of the trainings and the manager is in charge of transfers and matches. Mentoz86 (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doh - it actually says "hovedtrener" in your link, but if you read these two articles from Aftenbladet and VG, you might find out what I mean. Mentoz86 (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean, but I still think that it is unclear who is in charge during championship games. In the article from Aftenbladet it says that Clotet Ruiz was "hovedtrener" at Halmstad, where he was in charge at the games. It all depends on what they mean by "Hareide blir manager og får det overordnede ansvaret for både det sportslige og spillerlogistikken". --Vistor (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Spillerlogistikken" means selling and buying players, while "det sportslige" in this context, means in charge of the team in matches aswell as the trainings even though "Pep" will lead the trainings. Here it says that "Pep" will be leading the trainings, while Hareide will "ha kontrollen på det sportslige apparatet og den sportslige satsingen, akkurat som før. " In this interview, "Pep" explains how it would be to work as a manager/coach "it's more like the english style". I thought this would be easier to explain to a Dane, then to a English-speaking person, but I guess not :P I guess I should add a reference or two in the morning, so that there will be no more misunderstandings. Mentoz86 (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here:"Etter alt å dømme få Ruiz ansvaret for treningsarbeidet, mens Åge Hareide fortsatt skal ta seg av laguttak og spillerkjøp." Mentoz86 (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that your are right :) That is a very unusual structure for a Scandinavian football club. --Vistor (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's not very common. Vålerenga Fotball tried this structure when Martin Andresen was appointent "manager" in 2008. They found out that itdidn't work, and Andresen is now "head coach". Solskjær, who came directly from England, was appointed manager in 2011, and now Hareide and Viking. I believe those are the only three "managers" in Norway. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peer F. Hansen‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 Danish 1st Division, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Viborg and Skive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012–13 2. Fußball-Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spiegel

Michael Frontzeck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spiegel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Danish Superliga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viborg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Danish 1st Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henri Atamaniuk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lorraine and Al-Arabi SC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonas Dal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mads Ibenfeldt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Søren Pape Poulsen may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andorra national football team managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andorra national football team managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andorra national football team managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Montenegro national football team managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vistor! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Portugal,

I apologize for any inconvenience, but I did not remove anything (or anything without explanation) in this manager's article. It was already written he had returned to Betis immediately after leaving WBA, so your sentence was doubled.

Now, I think a compromise has been reached, and both references (the one I already had and the one you added) can be kept in article. Happy editing/2015 --84.90.219.128 (talk) 13:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luka Bogdan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Defender and Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vistor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vistor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Vestsjælland squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Add92 (talk) 10:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vistor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas Christiansen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find this comment rather odd, since I did not add any information that wasn't already in the article... --Vistor (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced information, though. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you did not delete the other unsourced information, which tell me that you did not see it was there, and because of that did not know that it was unsouced. Well, no harm done since I have now added a source. --Vistor (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's standard to have separate spells for caretaker/permanent. If you disagree then please start a discussion at WT:FOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I have done now, since you have provided zero arguments. --Vistor (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021–22 Danish 2nd Divisions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 1#2021–22 Danish 2nd Divisions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rationale: Danish 2nd Division is now a single group because 3rd Division was created for 2021–22. Santiago Claudio (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Data from Megafon does unfortunately not belong in the public domain. Please refrain from adding it. See politologi.dk for an explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.226.240 (talk) 05:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023–24 Danish 3rd Division, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 14:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Philippe Hinschberger article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]