User talk:W9793

Hello, W9793, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 05:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Foreign relations of Russia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello W9793! Your additions to Evan S. Medeiros have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikiproject categories, such as Category:WikiProject Africa articles or Category:WikiProject Politics articles, go on the talk page, not on the main article page — and further, they are transcluded by the use of WikiProject templates, and not directly declared on the page as a [[Category:Bla bla]] statement. So please don't go around adding articles to Wikiproject categories that are for talk pages. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. W9793 (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, David Dollar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to show notability and satisfy the verifiability requirement. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've updated the draft - please advise if further references are needed. Thanks. W9793 (talk) 12:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into David Dollar. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article on Mark Baxter Lambert! Well done, really great writing and sourcing on China and international relations related articles as well, thanks for your contributions here and happy editing!

Justiyaya 02:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Justiyaya! Thanks for reviewing & leaving the note! W9793 (talk) 14:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! Feel free to ping me for help if you need to deal with Chinese language sources or something else on wiki :D Justiyaya 14:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elbridge Colby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elbridge Colby was considered for a top job in Jeb Bush's 2016 presidential campaign, but was not hired after "prominent, interventionist neoconservatives" objected? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elbridge Colby. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elbridge Colby), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nadège Rolland. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a WP:BLP and therefore needs in-depth coverage in the source or at least, a good amount, source are just passing mentions while some are not reliable (see WP:SIGCOV). I don’t want to take to AfD, yet.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Derek Scissors. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ibjaja055 (talk) 03:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Global Engagement Center at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. I probably won't get to a review until tonight or tomorrow, but someone else can always step in and get to it before me. Viriditas (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special Competitive Studies Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Global Engagement Center at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Viriditas (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Dan Blumenthal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — MaterialWorks 20:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dan Blumenthal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dan Blumenthal, a senior defense official in the Bush administration, believes that China has "three roads" to gain control of Taiwan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dan Blumenthal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dan Blumenthal), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarun Chhabra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Global Music Diplomacy Initiative, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a video of U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken performing "Hoochie Coochie Man" at the September 2023 launch of the Global Music Diplomacy Initiative (pictured) went viral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Global Music Diplomacy Initiative. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Global Music Diplomacy Initiative), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793,

Thank you for creating American Security Project.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article is likely notable, found extensive mentions in CNN and NYTimes alone, not SIGCOV but would pass under WP:BASIC keep

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking - I will review & incorporate them later. W9793 (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User W9793,

I've recently contributed well-referenced material to several pages related to President Obama. The information I added aimed to present a balanced view by acknowledging both positive "PR material" and critical perspectives on his Foreign Policy.

It's crucial to uphold the collaborative nature of editing without allowing personal political opinions to dictate content removal. While I understand everyone brings their unique perspective, it's essential to maintain a diverse and comprehensive representation of views.

Deleting content solely based on personal opinions could undermine the integrity of the collaborative editing process. Imagine if every editor started removing content they disagreed with—Wiki would lose its credibility.

I'm not interested in engaging in a continuous cycle of undoing edits, but I want to emphasize that if content deletion continues due to political opinions, I may have to seek arbitration to address this matter impartially.

Instead, let's consider our differences as opportunities for enriching the wiki. Our varied perspectives can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of foreign policy and social sciences. It's my hope that we can collaborate constructively, respecting each other's contributions and avoiding any unintentional sabotage of one another's work.

Wishing you a fantastic 2024,

Best regards, JCDV (talk) 21:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Global Engagement Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Russian propaganda outlet Sputnik compared the Global Engagement Center to the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Global Engagement Center. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Global Engagement Center), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WaggersTALK 00:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Shanthi Kalathil at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Ivan Kanapathy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: WP:QPQ needed for this nomination. Viriditas (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Oriana Skylar Mastro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads-up: because you have more than five nominations, you now have to do a QPQ review going forward for each new nomination, including this one. See WP:QPQ for details. Viriditas (talk) 21:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Turpin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American security official Matthew Turpin believes that the United States and China are already in a new cold war? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Turpin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Turpin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Turpin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Turpin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 20:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas J. Wright (American scholar), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas J. Wright's PhD dissertation focused on US–Soviet relations in the late 1940s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas J. Wright (American scholar). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas J. Wright (American scholar)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WaggersTALK 00:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shanthi Kalathil, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shanthi Kalathil believes Radio Free Asia "filled a critical role in combating Chinese disinformation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shanthi Kalathil. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shanthi Kalathil), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Dollar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophie Richardson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Dollar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Global Music Diplomacy Initiative you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Frostly -- Frostly (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Global Engagement Center you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MovieTalk101178 -- MovieTalk101178 (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't generally add superfluous citations to material introduced in lede that is discussed (with RS!) later in the text. Revert with care. 142.157.236.100 (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Global Music Diplomacy Initiative you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Global Music Diplomacy Initiative and Talk:Global Music Diplomacy Initiative/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Frostly -- Frostly (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the mention of Jean Oi, but very much appreciated your looking after this article, which needs more work. But there's a new president now, and the general Wikipedia policy is not to include current and changeable information. We work on some of the same areas, and I look forward the seeing more of your contributions!ch (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. W9793 (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Derek Scissors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Global Music Diplomacy Initiative you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Global Music Diplomacy Initiative for comments about the article, and Talk:Global Music Diplomacy Initiative/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Frostly -- Frostly (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophie Richardson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Richardson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Launchballer 12:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Global Engagement Center you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Global Engagement Center for comments about the article, and Talk:Global Engagement Center/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MovieTalk101178 -- MovieTalk101178 (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nadège Rolland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Oaktree b, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Zack Cooper, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Oaktree b (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W9793. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nadège Rolland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zack Cooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Cooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 18:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oriana Skylar Mastro you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oriana Skylar Mastro you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oriana Skylar Mastro and Talk:Oriana Skylar Mastro/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 22:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oriana Skylar Mastro you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oriana Skylar Mastro for comments about the article, and Talk:Oriana Skylar Mastro/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shanthi Kalathil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 03:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Oriana Skylar Mastro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 07:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shanthi Kalathil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shanthi Kalathil for comments about the article, and Talk:Shanthi Kalathil/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 06:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oriana Skylar Mastro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oriana Skylar Mastro (pictured), a Stanford political scientist, joined the U.S. Air Force as a PhD student to better understand military issues in the Asia Pacific? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oriana Skylar Mastro 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oriana Skylar Mastro), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Fontaine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Fontaine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]