User talk:Wikipelli

This is Wikipelli's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 14 days

Some problems are glaring. Obvious lengthy puff pieces from comics and writers. Major gaps in art and literature of the 20th century (No Stu Horn or any of his circle?). Unchallenged PR from companies.

Some issues are less obvious perhaps. An ongoing, seemingly worsening bias in favor of white male cis western writers and artists and scholars. A lack of any critique of powerful institutions self image unless there has been a recognized "controversy." A definite center right slant in any page on economics, social history. A tight erasure of and bias against newer points of view in certain topics such as the historicity or lack thereof of jesus. I don't think these are deliberate failings or that there is any person to blame. It is more about a lack of concerted in certain areas, and a historic lack of diversity in contributors and editors. What can be done? 2601:401:500:37A0:E5AF:72C8:306C:242 (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess to answer, What can be done?, I'd say get busy!  :). I don't know who Stu Horn is or what circle he is in, but if you believe he's noteworthy, get busy creating an article. Check out the Help page on writing your first article and contribute!

Similarly, if you believe that all viewpoints are not represented or all facts are not being presented, you are encouraged to edit articles that you believe are lacking to include that information. Remember to be civil and productive and utilize the article's talk page to discuss changes.

The misconception is that there are just a handful of editors that make all the articles and others who critique them. This project is for YOU to contribute! If you need help at any time, please feel free to contact me. Wikipelli ^Talk 23:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you obviously have a problem with gamers MoreDraw (talk) 23:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with gamers at all. I DO have a problem with editors vandalizing articles. Why don't you try to do something more constructive? Wikipelli ^Talk 23:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey, I saw you reversedy edit on the page "Spacetoon", listen, the reason why I put colored text is so that I could bring the page back to its original form from a couple years or months ago (I dont know how many years or months ago the page had colored text because I joined Wikipedia in 2023. Ok bye. LTDF2013YT (talk) 22:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean that the text should be in a variety of colors. It was wrong then, it's wrong now. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this part of the MOS. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]