Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcas (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Arcas (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, fails WP:BAND, only references are to online-only reviews of self-published demo. In the interest of full disclosure, before filing this Afd I removed two external links, one was a broken link and the other was a myspace blog removed per WP:ELNO PGWG (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 20:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's a shame to see an article actually be written fairly well deleted compared to many that get kept, but the band just isn't notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete. Prodder here. The album is self-produced and the reviews aren't enough for notability. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.