Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollygood
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bollygood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to meet WP:ORG. Very few available sources and the BBC source is about a fundraiser and record attempt than the charity Mkdwtalk 09:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to fail general notability guidelines for organizations. SarahStierch (talk) 01:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - One-off Guinness World Record breaking attempt with no lasting social significance. Congrats for the good effort for a good cause, but this is a GNG failure, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 03:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.