Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boyracer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination has been withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boyracer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail music notability criteria Warren L.T. Peace (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. Warren L.T. Peace (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. AllMusic has a biography and a lot of reviews of their records, Pitchfork Media has three reviews, PopMatters has a review, Trouser Press has an entry for the band, and so on. toweli (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+ a review from Exclaim! toweli (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Great job finding sources! I think we should chuck the list of singles and EPs and rename the section "Select discography". Geschichte (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• (Author) Keep as I don't start articles on musicians who do not meet WP:MUSIC. We do not have selection criteria for discographies and a complete list is encyclopedic, so I disagree with the "Select Discography" proposal and suggest instead a reformatting. Chubbles (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly sufficiently notable for inclusion, as evidenced by coverage. --Michig (talk) 11:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn based on toweli's work on finding sources. @Chubbles, perhaps better sourcing when creating … Agree that the discography needs to be pruned. Warren L.T. Peace (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.