Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bud Hub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Hub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only links I found on a google search were primary sources. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:55, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - With the list of strains table, it reads more like a promotional piece than anything else. The only assertion of notability is that they were ranked number one in a magazine, something that is not well sourced. I searched Google news and found nothing. There appears to be more notability regarding the founder than the actual company. Tiptoety ^talk 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable. A Google search reveals few pages related to the business that could be used as sources, apart from things like the business's own site and its entry on Yelp. dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 05:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The references stated in the article are secondary sources. See references on the bottom of article page. (Giodamotta (talk))

Delete simply non-notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My first searches at News and Books immediately found nothing which isn't surprising as this was recently founded and isn't something that would attract a lot of good attention. SwisterTwister talk 18:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.