Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Durning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Durning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO1E the only reason this article exists is because of the allegations of sexual abuse: [1] no notability otherwise and coverage is more about the Catholic Church's role than Durning himself Traumnovelle (talk) 03:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DELETE for now UzbukUdash (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Insufficiently notable and WP:BLP1E. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete as this person does not appear to be notable beyond the allegations, which in this case is not enough to exceed WP:NCRIME or WP:PERP. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 22:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.