Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Dawber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 23:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Howard Dawber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
One of many articles that has crept into Wikipedia on British prospective parliamentary candidates. WP:POLITICIAN does not attribute notability to candidates, and there is no evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". I42 (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 20:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I would argue for inclusion of this article and all other article regarding parliamentary candidates for reasons outlined here [User:ZTomane1|ZTomane1]] (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of current notability. If he is elected, then he should have an article. Warofdreams talk 02:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Delete No 3rd party refs and candidate clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 13:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep not as a politician, but because of business interests at [1]. MikeHobday (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does this non-independent bio satisfy WP:N? I42 (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.