Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JPT Scare Band
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JPT Scare Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some coverage, but I don't think it passes GNG and they definitely don't meet MUSICBIO. Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - The article definitely needs to be cleaned up, but the band has more coverage than currently used in the article. They have a reliable staff-written bio at AllMusic: [1], and coverage of the "lost classic" variety at these sources of varying reliability: [2], [3], [4], [5]. They're an obscure cult act but with some cleanup there is enough for a basic article here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I think it barely passes WP:GNG due to articles by LouderSound, Decible Magazine, and Goldmine Magazine. Keeping in mind that WP:INTERVIEW sources are primary sources not secondary. TipsyElephant (talk) 22:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified by Doomsdayer that shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.