Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simmons Foods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simmons Foods

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. I am unable to locate references that meet both ORGIND and CORPDEPTH. Most of the references regurgitate corporate announcements and PR. The rest focus on the class action lawsuit but don't meet CORPDEPTH. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Arkansas. Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The following sources show the company meets WP:NCORP (not exhaustive):

"Simmons Foods, Inc". D&B Hoovers. Retrieved 2022-06-04 – via ProQuest.
"Simmons Foods, Inc - Company Capsule". Canadean. Retrieved 2022-06-04 – via ProQuest.
Fandl, Kevin J. (2018-09-03). Law and Public Policy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-24307-0.
"Rehab scam: Defendants in court-ordered rehab work for free". Reveal. 2017-10-04. Retrieved 2022-06-04.

The bottom two sources describe the companies employment practices, which is in scope of WP:CORPDEPTH.Jumpytoo Talk 23:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep large corporation in the pet food processing space with sources to back up information. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While the primary sources need to be cut in part or in whole, the corporation is worthy of note. SWinxy (talk) 04:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.