Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snooker plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Snooker. (non-admin closure) czar · · 01:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snooker plus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never-popular game variant. Negligible sources (one glossary entry, one newspaper snippet from 1959). Very little to document. LukeSurl^{t c} 16:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with snooker, perhaps? Yintan 20:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to snooker or a new article on Snooker variants. There seem to be several variants where a brief summary is about all we're likely to have, and covering them in one article may be best. --Michig (talk) 06:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to snooker. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to snooker Fork me (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to snooker, nothing here that isn't already covered in the main snooker article anyway..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.