Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical College Balapitiya
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. We do not delete articles for being stubs. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Technical College Balapitiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Extremely short, only 1 reference, but STILL falls short of A7. James1011R (talk, contribs) 12:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I've upgraded the article somewhat and it now has an External Link. It's a state-run college, and by long-established convention secondary and higher-level schools and colleges are considered "notable". PamD 09:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Article still extremely short. James1011R (talk, contribs) 13:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But brevity is not a reason for deletion. PamD 09:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as stated above secondary and higher educational institutions are generally notable. I have already found references and no doubt local searches will find many more. Bringing such institutions forward for deletion less than 24 hours after creation is hardly the best way to go. TerriersFan (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The nominator has not provided any remotely policy-compliant rationale for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Secondary and tertiary educational institutions are generally considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.