Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 8
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Fastily (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 00:42, Friday, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Java
Source code available: Once I have written it
Function overview: Finds files flagged with {{Nominated for deletion on Commons}}
that have been deleted on Commons and applies {{Deleted on Commons}}
accordingly.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): n/a
Edit period(s): Bi-weekly
Estimated number of pages affected: 5-10 per run
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: As described above. -FASTILY 00:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- See also: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 7 -FASTILY 00:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 10:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Please ensure that the {{deleted on Commons}} template always contains the file name. For example, FastilyClone removed the filename in Special:Diff/713468926. Since {{deleted on Commons}} may remain on pages for many years, we should not rely on the local file not being moved. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- FastilyClone is not a bot, but rather an alternate account of mine; the edit you're referencing was made manually, and is therefore wholly irrelevant to this BRFA. However, since you asked, I removed
{{NotMovedToCommons}}
because it is redundant. Note that the file in question was transferred, but ultimately deleted off Commons. -FASTILY 08:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- FastilyClone is not a bot, but rather an alternate account of mine; the edit you're referencing was made manually, and is therefore wholly irrelevant to this BRFA. However, since you asked, I removed
@Fastily: what is the status of this one? -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
. — xaosflux Talk 09:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]- Haven't done the test run, but I'm writing the code right now. Should be ready soon -FASTILY 04:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xaosflux: The bot found 47 instances of local files transferred to Commons and then deleted on Commons. Everything worked as expected. Could the task be approved now, or do I have to wait until 100 edits are made? -FASTILY 08:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Haven't done the test run, but I'm writing the code right now. Should be ready soon -FASTILY 04:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. - All of the trials look in order, the trial count was for a "maximum" only. — xaosflux Talk 14:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.