Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 17 April 19 >

April 18

[edit]

Template:QingdaoM color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Qingdao Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Guiyang Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Hefei Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Jinan Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Lanzhou Metro, and Module:Adjacent stations/Wenzhou Rail Transit. Gonnym (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul Metro stations

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The style templates (Template:M1 style, etc.) still need to be replaced. Gonnym (talk) 23:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added a few styles that were unused. --Gonnym (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FHR

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused flag template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Ulam spiral

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these modules. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module which produces the Ulam spiral template, also unused, but has been known to have color contrast issues. Seems unlikely both of these would have any use anywhere unless this could be used on Ulam spiral. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Broken template format that duplicates sources used on Semantic Web Services Language. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSLI Navy OR

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused military rank/insignia templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reference values for the HICP and interest rate convergence criteria (2013)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Byzantium succession

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused family tree chart which may not be accurate. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed as the same list is featured on People's Liberation Army Air Force under the current inventory section. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major National and State parties TN

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart of political parties in Tamil Nadu, India. Maybe it can be substituted on List of political parties in Tamil Nadu. But the parties are presented in list format. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Razr

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Template to emphasize tex by letter-spacing". Does nothing but transclude itself. Only edit history has been it's creation and a minor edit following that by two minutes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lonoikahaupu, Keawepoepoe, Keeaumoku Pāpaiahiahi, Kamanawa and Kameʻeiamoku family tree

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 25. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WarningsTable

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created six months ago. OK to userfy if the creator wants to keep working on it. Creator's account is globally locked. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with no mainspace for use. Was being transcluded as a link in a navbox before removal. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If wanted, this can be subst to 2016 Zambian general election. Gonnym (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2015, no substantive edits since then. It appears that this template has not been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Information related to this is already featured on Comparison of current Macintosh models. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan Armed Forces sidebar

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This infobox has no transclusions, having apparently been incorporated into the only possible place for it, Pakistan Armed Forces, at some point. Not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-may

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul mass transit color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alihodzic

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Created by a user with 3 edits. Might even have been an incorrect attempt in using a citation. Gonnym (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused charts. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Benson-Convertibles

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Created 8 years ago and is unused. Gonnym (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saltivska style

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Pages using it have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Kharkiv Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Town and Cantonment wise map of Lahore

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map template. File image is already used on dozens of articles across Wikipedia including two other used templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Template:Lahore City District is used instead. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong Public Organizations

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A giant mass of text with only four links to articles. Currently used on a draft submitted for review of the same name, Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations. This does not aid in navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow. This isn't how a navbox should be used. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shmee150 graphical timeline

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Affleck-On Track

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation template. The exact citation is used outside of template space on 19 pages. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep Thanks for the heads up. There were two difficulties leading to the non-use of the template. First, an editor had discovered that there was a technical problem with the way the template citation linked with sfn inline tags. Instead of fixing that technical problem, the editor deleted the template from the article and substituted a custom made citation. Secondly, various articles have had a custom citation added by other editors in apparent ignorance of the citation template. Both of these difficulties of course defeated the very purpose of the citation template, which is to ensure that a frequently cited book is properly cited uniformly throughout the encyclopedia. I have now fixed the technical problem (which required only the removal of one of the template citation's parameters) and have been adding the template to the pages where it should have been used but wasn't. That should lead to a keeping of the template, which is now on multiple articles as intended. Bahnfrend (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    "Speedy keep" a first comment is very meaningless. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Second French intervention in Mexico infobox

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An infobox for this conflict already exists on Second French intervention in Mexico as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is certainly no benefit in duplication. The sole issue is whether the infobox, which is very large, is better hosted as a separate template or as a part of an already big article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 07:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as infoboxes should be used directly inside the article. The only reason an infobox like this looks big is because the usage of references inside the infobox contrary to MOS:INFOBOXREF. Gonnym (talk) 08:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is the statement that "infoboxes should be used directly inside the article" an actual policy, or a statement of preference? Even without references, it would be pretty big. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Infoboxes are big, tables are big, prose sections are big. Should we start moving everything to stand-alone templates now? Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_18&oldid=1084864671"