User talk:Unreal7

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all the little things you do for Wikipedia's articles that amount to a lot. Keep up the good work! Most editors on here just work on one specific topic, but you are unusually original! — Robin (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all the little things you do for Wikipedia's articles that amount to a lot. Keep up the good work! Most editors on here just work on one specific topic, but you are unusually original! — Robin (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for the bold and commonsense move at Jerry Nadler.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do that. It's a violation of WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just following info from the website.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller talk 16:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Nomination for deletion of

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Rosie Winterton. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. The source for the category literally comes from here, the same way the LFI category comes from here.

References need to be cited in the body of the article, not merely in an edit summary. What use is that to the casual reader? How can they be expected to check the page history, in case an editor left a link to a source in one of their edit summaries? You've edited here for nearly nine years, you really ought to have developed an understanding of how to reference content by now. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you rewrote working references, in violation of the well understood principle "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Why? Geo Swan (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Odsonne Édouard. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and untrue are not the same thing. Unreal7 (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:V, "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.". Mattythewhite (talk) 22:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Clapton singles discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dejan Lovren, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unreal7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1985 BRIT Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 07:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Unreal7, wondered if you could have a look at this edit again. Unsure what refill has done with reference 55 but looks like a lot of garbage to me. Keith D (talk) 10:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wanted discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Found You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chester Bowles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adlai Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{uw-editsummary}} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing this explanation. It wasn't clear to me why you were removing all that information, and I thank you for doing so now. I probably shouldn't have left the template here though. You've clearly received enough, and I'm an experienced enough editor that I should have realized that. You have my sincerest apologies. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cheryl Toh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 23:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waiting for a Star to Fall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Merrill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Black Widow.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unreal7! Family members of people with articles on Wikipedia have a certain right to privacy.' As per WP:BLPNAME: When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, [...] it is often preferable to omit it [...] Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. And as per WP:BLPPRIVACY: Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources [...] If [...] the person is borderline notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it.. A son yes, maybe even the year of birth, but anything more isn't well published and shouldn't be included as it adds nothing of significant value: a child is not even "borderline notable". Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 23:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Sam Smith (singer). Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Launchballer 21:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism. I got thanked for it. Unreal7 (talk) 21:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruth-Anne Cunningham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slow Hands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 in British music charts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Let's Dance and Too Close (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xinjiang re-education camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – I'm not sure I agree with the edits you've made at List of best-selling singles of the 2000s (decade) in the United Kingdom... the reason being that the OCC's recent list appears to include sales to date, i.e. up to 2019, when the original list was meant to be for sales between 2000 and 2009. Richard3120 (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Only sales from 2000 to 2009. Crazy and Poker Face are listed as below 1 million, despite being million-sellers now. Unreal7 (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough then. But does it say so in the book? Because it really isn't clear at all from the OCC article... it talks about "Crazy" having 977,000 "now". And it says eleven million-sellers originated from that decade, but Lady Gaga's two singles at nos. 16 and 22 are also million-sellers... but surely they also originated in that decade? Richard3120 (talk) 18:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Poker Face was 2010 and Bad Romance was 2013. Unreal7 (talk) 20:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking "Just Dance" and "Poker Face", which were both 2008. But never mind, you're right about it just being sales from within that decade, although the journalism in that article is really poor and confusing. Richard3120 (talk) 21:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. They both hit a million in the 2010s (both released in the UK in 2009) and Just Dance isn't quite there yet. Unreal7 (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of target seats in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Schneider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Richard Park (broadcaster) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Classic FM

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neale Hanvey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unreal7! Please be aware that reFill duplicates authors when creating citation templates. For example, see your edit to Happy Xmas (War Is Over). When using reFill, please check the results, and make any fixes if necessary. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 22:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Wyman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you use reFill. This is a useful tool but sometimes introduces errors, most frequently inserting the unsupported parameter "|deadurl=y" instead of "|url-status=dead", such as here. I would ask you to preview your edits and resolve any issues before submitting. Thanks. --John B123 (talk) 13:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would repeat my request from yesterday that you check for errors after using reFill [2] [3] [4] --John B123 (talk) 23:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And again [5] [6] [7] [8] --John B123 (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ivanna Tinkle. Since you had some involvement with the Ivanna Tinkle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CLP deputy nominations.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited When I Come Around, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basket Case (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Unreal. When you move templates, you also need to update the name parameter in the templates, otherwise the V-T-E links don't work (they still direct to the old title). Cheers, Number 57 22:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antony Higginbotham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julie Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aster Aweke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. As previously pointed out to you, reFill can introduce errors such as [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and [14]--John B123 (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Cobain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Fish Out of Water (book). Since you had some involvement with the A Fish Out of Water (book) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 03:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Whittle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect GTFGK. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 11#GTFGK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Unreal. Just a quick note about the Momentum article, I saw you edited it recently. An IP editor is causing low-level mischief. I've reverted them once and left it for now, but worth keeping an eye on just in case! doktorb _words^deeds 22:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Celador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For setting up the Times Radio page - super interesting MG2020J (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Unreal. Hope you're well. I'm reaching out to people who have edited South Wales East (Senedd Cymru electoral region) and, in particular, people who know how to edit the table of list members. The Conservative Senedd member Mohammed Asghar has died and having tried to just enter "Vacant" underneath his name, I've got lost in a mathematical haze of rowspan=x rowspan=z rowspan=q confusion. I just can't for the life of me work out which rowspans and column spans and other numbers I have to increase by 1 to add the word "vacant" underneath his name. Could you either help or do this for me please? I had the same problems with European Parliament regions, I just get brain freeze whenever I try to work out what to do with rowspan numbers and I'm too scared to just go ahead and wish for the best!

Thanks for any assistance :) I'll post a version of this message on a few other editors pages too just in case there's someone else about. Speak soon doktorb _words^deeds 18:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks to User: Arms & Hearts all is well. Stand down! doktorb _words^deeds 19:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The Unbelievable Truth (radio show), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from McFly into Room on the 3rd Floor. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unreal7,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Hasan Piker, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamond Princess.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James More is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James More until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Young Dumb Thrills, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Charmk (talk) 23:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Young Dumb Thrills, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 09:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Family Fortunes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Directioner. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Directioner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor with experience looking at move requests, would you mind looking at and hopefully closing the move discussion on Talk:Richard Leonard (Scottish politician)? I will be happy to move the page and disambiguation page and add hatnotes. Alex (talk) 18:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Much thanks for contributing to the page Booty Luv Willygeorgina (talk) 04:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article James Arthur Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged as needing additional references for seven months, but they are the same two references when the article was created seven years ago. There are two references, both are non-reliable sources just stating tour dates.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hurrican Bawbag. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 13#Hurrican Bawbag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lee Gaze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you spare some time and review my nomination of this article? Here is the featured article criteria for guidance, in case you choose to do so. Thanks. isento (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lynda Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asteria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm a big fan of your work on the site!

This might be a weird request but I was wondering if you could put your brilliant editing/writing skills to work on the Ezra Klein article. I attempted to correct the lede and intro but the main body is severely lacking (i.e. poorly organised, baggy in parts). Since you are such a pro at this, and I am a novice - as you will no doubt notice from my use of visual edits - I thought you might be able help bring the article to a better standard. Cosmopolismetropolis (talk) 00:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Seems fine to me. Unreal7 (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, maybe I'm wrong. It just seems strange that the article is not arranged in chronological order and also that it spends a lot of time discussing some issues (particularly from the mid-2000s) but is very light on major developments in his career from Vox onward.

Though if you prefer not to work on the project I understand. Cosmopolismetropolis (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have made several contributions to The Recognition of Palestine Article. I was about to make an edit on that article but I decided not to when I learned that I am no longer allowed to make edits due to my lack of experience. However I do belive my edit last month was fair game becuase I think this is a new Wikipedia policy. Moldova's text was taken out of it's box so I put it back in to combat vandalism as the edit before mine started to clean up the article. I recall a edit from a user caliming Moldova granted recognition to Palestine in 1994 so the edit before mine was to put Moldova back on the list of countries that don't recognize Palestine and I put it's text back in the box. I am not 100 percent sure if that claim is false or not. The source provided was in Romanian and I am nowhere near being able to speak it fluently. Now for the main reason I am writing this. I am here to request an edit on the map of countries image on that article. Saint Kitts and Nevis recognized Palestine in 2019 and the map still says they haven't. So yeah if you are premitted to make that edit it would be great if you did that. I think the requirements are 500 edits minimum experience and your account being at least 30 days old. I am not 100 percent sure if that's it but I am sure you might see the warning when you go to edit that article.

Hey, in cleaning up Good Article database mismatches I noticed that you moved Joshua King (footballer) to "Josh King", but when I checked the talk page I saw that there was no discussion, and that the previous discussion you started about the same move lead to a WP:SNOW closure because the consensus was so strongly in favor of keeping the name as "Joshua". Maybe the move should be discussed again if you think that some external factor will lead to a different consensus this time? -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Miller (sociologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Union of Students.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The greatest hits and a little bit more.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Northern_Independence_Party and CSD regulations on the recreation of deleted material. Thank you. doktorb _words^deeds 11:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Independence Party, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Independence Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unreal7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Young Dumb Thrills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Independence Party.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 02:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Map of UK overseas military bases.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 02:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Bombs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DESI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Vamps - Wake Up album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thelma Walker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little England.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nihal Arthanayake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kevin Clark (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, one role. No article until his unfortunate death. One event does not justify and article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreal, what is the reason you made this edit where you replaced the piped link List of recurring The Simpsons characters#Cecil Terwilliger with Cecil bob? I realize it may not be related to the edit summary "Filling in 1 references using Reflinks" you gave. Jay (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A) That was 7 years ago. B) I have no idea how that happened. Unreal7 (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Give a Little Bit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malibu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Help others. Krishna pearl (talk) 09:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stooshe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chesterfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Independent Green Voice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Independent_Green_Voice_(2nd_nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. doktorb _words^deeds 21:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, there's post-election material now as well, including results. IGV was one of the 10 most popular parties. Unreal7 (talk)

doktorb _words^deeds 04:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thx for editing the NED page. j wanted to say hi x glad u didn't remove my edit slightly critical of it ButterSlipper (talk) 02:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The X Factor (British series 16). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#The X Factor (British series 16) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Launchballer 01:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OneRepublic - Oh My My.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

source

In tennis, the term Grand Slam refers to the accomplishment of winning all four major championships-the championships of Australia, France, Britain (Wimbledon), and the United States-in the same calendar season. The feat has been achieved six times (by five different players). Grand Slam is commonly misused to describe any one of the four major tournaments.

2A02:1388:2092:39A6:416F:35DC:EC5B:AC42 (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Help (2021 TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whiteguru (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had created a page on Help, unaware of yours as it had not shown up in searches. I apologize for the overlap, but I don't approve of the implication of plagiarism in your edit comment. It was not deliberate or done with malice against your own contribution.

--SavageEditor (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lachele Carl

added a link pointing to National Theatre

Roza Salih

added a link pointing to Asylum

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim Iversen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you get the ping notification I sent you regarding this - Talk:Next Scottish Parliament election? Apologies if you have not got around to it or don't want to take part, I'm just not sure if anyone got the notification as I haven't received any responses as yet. Helper201 (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No didn't get it. Happy to help though. Unreal7 (talk) 22:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 lockdown in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use reFill to convert simple cite to full cite at the above project (this includes all archived months and years predating it). Simple cite is used by consensus within the project to reduce the bulk of the coding for what are invariably long lists and (for some) unbearably slow times in loading each page. If you think this is unreasonable, please open up a section at the corresponding article Talk page. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also please refer to this already open section in the Talk page at Deaths in 2021, which contains extensive conversation and debate on the subject. Thanks again. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using reFill 2 to change simple cite to full cite in archived Deaths pages. I have already asked you to visit the current discussion on this matter at Talk:Deaths in 2021#Bare sources. Ref ^(chew)(do) 16:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you made an edit to the welsh independence page and in the yes/no independence polls section the results for the 23-28 April 2021 poll were changed from 28% in favour/57% against/15% undecided to 42% in favour/49% against/8% undecided. I think you may have made an error as if you look at the Savanta poll results given by the hyperlink and scroll down to page 9, the original 28/57/15 results can be found. The table given in page 1 of the hyperlink document does not accurately represent the results given in the poll and I think the new values given in the yes/no independence poll table should be reverted to the original 28%/57%/15% for/against/undecided results.DaveyA1 (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smooth Radio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Everybody's Changing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hopes and Fears.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify: my recent comment about two of your edits was intended to describe your editing actions, not your editing intentions. My apologies if that sounded like it was describing your intentions - sorry! Boud (talk) 05:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Collins (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Coleman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philip Proudfoot, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Proudfoot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruth Jones (politician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Foulkes and Doreen Massey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Santa Clause trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Limitless Win requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Film Creator (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Sillars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Better Together.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Labour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shaun Scott (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Labour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Rogic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James McCarthy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Animals Do the Funniest Things.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Vardy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsborough.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Craig Gordon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nations League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lizzie Cundy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sue Moxley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maggie Scott, Lady Scott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Lamont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Honeyz - Love of a Lifetime.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marianne Elliott (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keisha White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Influencer marketing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endorsement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unreal7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 01:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shine Ya Light.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to point out that following your edits to this article, it reads as if the New York Times was a British newspaper. I don't want to just revert it, but I'll leave you to decide how best to rephrase it. Dani di Neudo (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Me Ol' Bamboo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Sherman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Car (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio X.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

silvia (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 02:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unreal7. I just noticed that two months ago, you split off the discography portion of Rex Orange County's article to a separate discography. If you do this in future, please note in an edit summary that you have split the content to a separate article, and in an edit summary on the article you have split the content to, note where it came from like I have just done. Copying Wikipedia content in this manner requires at least a note of attribution. Also, as for the template you created for the artist, please see WP:NENAN and the informal "rule of five". There are only four other articles about Rex Orange County besides his main article to link to, so the template did not need to be created quite yet. That being said, please also see WP:EXISTING. Navigational templates are not discographies and are not supposed to be "complete". They are only for linking to existing articles, so anything without an article should be left out. Ss112 12:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wards of South Ayrshire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric ^talk 02:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Policy Exchange has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention.

Unlike athletes or those who held political office, for people in the arts, even if their work hasn't come before the public for a while, it’s not customary to use the term "former" (e.g., Marcel Duchamp). Particularly in a branch of the arts like film directing where there can be long gaps of apparent inactivity (Francis Coppola, Todd Field, etc.).

Selecting out negative opinions of an artist’s work, particularly when the inclusion of other critical opinions of their work isn’t part of an entry—particularly positive ones—seems unfairly biased and disparaging. Scholar88888 (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Davies-Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Greenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to climate change. This is a standard message to inform you that climate change is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 13:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ashley Richards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unreal7! On the article "Eco-socialism", for the "ref name=PraxisRU", it appears your edit added a link to an unrelated pornographic website instead of the website that contained the reference. The original reference was dead anyway, so I went ahead and removed it. I realize this edit was two years ago (to the day actually), but I just wanted to make you aware. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Year 3000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Busted (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted my edit claiming "unexplained revert" smth. I just attempted to keep the citation version set for the page. Then you changed the references which resulted in many problems. Hope you'll fix your edits. Egeymi (talk) 20:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was fixing the references, e.g. adding "last" and "first" and removing a duplicate reference. You undid them all. Unreal7 (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Iris Robinson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was wondering if you can revisit this edit as the added URL cannot be found. Many thanks. Keith D (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Connect Radio 97.2 & 107.4, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Mas que Nada has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 747pilot (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Northern Ireland local elections, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Freedom Alliance (UK) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 21 § Freedom Alliance (UK) until a consensus is reached. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – I noticed that you added Mexico to the list of countries that have recognized the State of Palestine at International recognition of the State of Palestine. My impression is that this hasn't actually occurred. (I'm very much in favour of recognizing the State of Palestine, so I'm not writing this for political reasons.) All sources that I can find for this (including the IRNA article you cited) refer to "the Spanish-language Twitter account [for Palestine], 'Palestino Hoy'". This Mexican article says that according to the Mexican Foreign Minstry the upgrading of the delegation to an embassy was a unilateral Palestinian step and that Mexico hasn't recognized a Palestinian state ("pero no ha reconocido un Estado Palestino"). I didn't want to undo your edits, both because this is a controversial topic and I wanted to hear your perspective first, and because you seem to have made some changes to other parts of the list in the same edit and it's probably easier for you to make sure those don't get lost in the reversion. If you agree, it would be great if you could revert the edits. Joriki (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharleen Spiteri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page So in Love with You.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreal7, you are an experienced editor. I don't know why you still aren't leaving edit summaries, like when you didn't see fit to explain why you removed 27,000 bytes from a page [15]. Yes, clearly you split the discography from Calum Scott's article to its own page, but then you didn't add a lead (all articles should have one) nor explain where the content came from, which is required on Wikipedia for attribution purposes. You didn't come up with that content yourself, you did a copy-and-paste. Please start leaving edit summaries and doing the bare minimum like typing a few words to explain what you're doing. Thank you. Ss112 08:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Softlemonades (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bernardo Arévalo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2022–23 Premier League, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extraordinary (Clean Bandit song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Busted - Greatest Hits 2.0 (Guest Features Edition).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today I removed content you added to Germany–Palestine relations, as it was too close to this Al Jazeera source. You removed and changed a few words, but the text was still about the same; you can see the overlap by clicking "iThenticate" on this report. I gave you a final warning in July so I am no following through on it here. If you want to be unblocked, you need to commit to not from copying from sources in your future editing and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. User:Moneytrees/Copyright blocks contains some advice on appealing this block. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 13:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I won't do it anymore. Unreal7 (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright is the ownership of something (physical or non-physical) by someone. Wikipedia allows various forms of content, particularly images, via Creative Commons. Things which violate copyright agreements get removed. Passing something off as your own (like videos, articles or paragraphs) is plagiarism, which is illegal under all circumstances. Copyrighted content is legal as long as it's explained what it's being used for, e.g. album covers, where no free alternative exists. I will only use paragraphs from someone else's article if it's in the form of a quote. Unreal7 (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. These answers are generally incorrect. --Yamla (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not refactor your comments after someone has already responded to them, please. --Yamla (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was only entering bullet points so that they looked less clunky. What was wrong with the answers? Unreal7 (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Basically all of your answers were incorrect. Taking just the answer to the first question, for example, copyright isn't ownership, nor does it apply to physical objects but rather to the creative work embodied by them. You really need to go back and read WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. I won't be responding further. --Yamla (talk) 16:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that's it? Unreal7 (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's it for the time being. You were advised above to read User:Moneytrees/Copyright blocks, which has a lot of useful advice. The best route right now is to take some time to fully read that page, and then gain a full understanding of the copyright policy and where you've been going wrong. Then when you're ready, engage with Moneytrees to see if they're prepared to give you another chance. Note that this block is the culmination of a series of warnings that don't appear to have been heeded, so this will require more than just a promise to not "do anything, similar or identical, again". And I doubt you'll be unblocked today or this week. Cheers, and hope this advice is useful.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Viktor Yanukovych (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nicholas McDonald has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Culture (Bottom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Culture (Bottom until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Take Me Home (One Direction album has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13 § Take Me Home (One Direction album until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unreal7. There is currently an open move request at Talk:UK Singles Chart regarding capitalisation in the article's title. Since you've edited several music chart-related articles, I wanted to bring it to your attention, in case you have any thoughts on the matter. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 09:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CBB13eyelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Is This the Way to Amarillo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luke Akehurst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jontesta (talk) 23:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Official Charts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Men's football has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 28 § Men's football until a consensus is reached. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]