Talk:Back to Basics (Christina Aguilera album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Back to Basics (Christina Aguilera album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Back to Basics (Christina Aguilera album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Christina Aguilera High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christina Aguilera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christina Aguilera on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christina AguileraWikipedia:WikiProject Christina AguileraTemplate:WikiProject Christina AguileraChristina Aguilera articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lotus is the fifth, Back To Basics is the third.

Again, there is a difference between studio albums and albums recorded in a studio (or every album would be a studio album, except for live ones) ^[1] Ã — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.37.233.75 (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.rcarecords.com/news/global-superstar-christina-aguilera-release-new-album-lotus-november-13th

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clear primary topic – when you type in "Back t-", this is the first suggestion after the Back to the Future films and Back to Black. Unreal7 (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think there was a mistake in the nominator's suggestion here, so I edited it accordingly. I'm not expressing support or opposition at this time. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't see this being the primary topic for "Back to Basics". O N R (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per WP:SONGDAB - User:BarrelProof, can we say don't do primary topics for multiple albums?, cf Back to Basics (Alan Hull album), 1994 Back to Basics (Anvil album), 2004, Back to Basics (Beenie Man album), 2004 Back to Basics (Billy Bragg album), 1987 Back to Basics (Maze album), 1993 In ictu oculi (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SONGDAB which states if there are two or more albums etc with the same name... --Richhoncho (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Since the popularity of music tends to be volatile and temporary, we should be very conservative about assigning WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status to particular songs or albums. This seems especially true of works produced within the most recent couple of decades, and here we have a work that is only eight years old being considered in relation to several prior works by other highly notable major artists (e.g., here we have Olivia Newton-John, Billy Bragg, The Temptations, and Maze). Also, very little evidence of primary topic status was provided – just the behavior of some unidentified autocomplete suggestion algorithm, which says nothing about long-term significance or the ratio of searches for one topic versus another. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No clear primary topic. I think most British people old enough to remember it, for example, would think of the political campaign. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SONGDAB guidelines and above comments. IPadPerson (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

For expansion

http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6406651/happy-birthday-christina-aguilera-5-most-underrated-songs

Simon (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

<! -- http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/57748/aguilera-goes-old-school-on-back-to-basics -->

Untitled

And I don't know why everyone has to get together because some people get their hearts broken up to two times and it really hurts when you are yelling you want to focus on yourself but they just want to focus on finding love and maybe good for you is a good song because it's a heartbreak song gets you like all emotional and I think it's about the one person that really really messed up your life that made you think about maybe I should just focus on school work college graduation there's a lot of stuff that people need focus on and some people just like getting a like a girl wants a once a boyfriend and it boy wants wants a girlfriend like there's too much to think about like these times 207.255.115.129 (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

207.255.115.129 (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.rcarecords.com/news/global-superstar-christina-aguilera-release-new-album-lotus-november-13th

[1]