There's a balance.
1. Indirection level
The fundamental goal of closing duplicate questions is to help people find the right answer by getting all of those answers in one place.
so, if a new question Q2 has an immediately-serviceable answer as an answer to an existing question Q1 (and assuming the two question are at least somewhat related etc.) - Q2 can, and perhaps should, be marked a dupe of Q1. However, if the answer to Q2 is "Take action A", and Q1 is "How do I perform action A?", then Q2 should not be marked a dupe of Q1.
In theory, it makes sense. In practice, chances are the following will happen:
- the answer to Q1 lists 5 different cases to follow.
- someone independently rewrites that for Q2, but because the new answer is less well-tested, misses some edge cases.
2. Solving the problem isn't all there is to an answer
Even though "how to install package" and "how to find the correct package name to install" together solves the problem, the information given in the new answer is still useful --- that the user is informed that the package is "supposed" to be available by default.
Summary
I think in this case, there is already a top answer that does not (incompletely) duplicate the target question, and provides useful additional information that would otherwise not be there, it should be kept.
Remember that un-logged-in users will be automatically redirected to the argument question when they click on the link e.g. from search engine result.
General clean-up
It is indeed a problem that the target question states it's Linux, which makes users (like the OP here) unhappy with the duplicate closure. Looking at the questions and the answers, I think there's no harm to edit the title of the question to say "TeX Live" instead of "Linux".
Recommendation for the OP
Instead of saying
Note: I know how to install TeXLive and individual TeXLive packages, please stop marking this as a duplicate of a question about doing that.
maybe it would be better to demonstrate it by rephrasing the question to:
I have already fixed the issue by installing tlmgr install ⟨somepackage⟩
. However, I would like to know why in my default installation ⟨explain what is your default installation⟩ does the error occur, because [I assume that if footmisc
needs perpage.sty
- it should have installed it.].
"just [install it][https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/73016/how-do-i-install-an-individual-package-on-a-linux-system?noredirect=1&lq=1]"
, linking to the same page as the duplicate. So your real question is not "what can I do about this error", but actually "why wasn't this package originally installed?", which you also acknowledge is a different question. (My guess: in addition to what samcarter said, the usual recommendation is to download all of texlive, so that you don't have to worry about this situation.)