User talk:Rockgenre
This user may have left Wikipedia. Rockgenre has not edited Wikipedia since March 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| |
Re Billion Dollar Babies
Rockgenre you need to get your facts right re Glen Buxton being "turned down" and Mick Mashbir playing from behind a curtain, Mick was on stage as was Glen both were playing as can be seen on the film of the tour released on DVD 'Good To See You Again Alice'. Bassist Dennis Dunaway has said "that's not true. I stood next to Glen every night. I don't know why people say that. We had nobody behind any curtain."
Steven Crayn
RE: Sugar Bear
[edit]Hello Rockgenre,
Yes it does appear to be the first time we actually talked to each other. Kindaa shame considering we've edited so often the same articles without talking. Suppose at least we weren't arguing. Unfortunately, I was away from wikipedia for a few days, partly due to IRL things and partly my feeling that I was on wikipedia too often, and it seems the ban has gone ahead without any comment of my own. I had not seen such behaviour as referred to by Beeblebrox and it seems a shame that Sugar Bear is longer acting like that. Munci (talk) 21:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I started the GA review on Blues for the Red Sun. Since your on vacation, I'll extend the waiting period or whatever to two weeks. CrowzRSA 17:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Billion Dollar Babies
[edit]The article Billion Dollar Babies you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Billion Dollar Babies for things which need to be addressed. CrowzRSA 17:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
[edit]J04n(talk page) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages.
Nominating GAs
[edit]HI. When you nominate an article for GA status it needs to be done via the articles talk page. A bot will then add it to the nominations list. Your nomination was removed by the bot as it wasn't done correctly.[1] There are instructions at the top of the WP:GAN page. If you need help let me know. AIRcorn (talk) 03:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome back. It is in the queue now and will hopefully be picked up soon. Best AIRcorn (talk) 04:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 01:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Bloody Knife...
[edit]Hi! Just to say that the GA review's on hold because of some close paraphrasing problems which have crept in during the evolution of the article. I'll await your response there, but just to emphasise that I'm very happy to help out with any advice if its useful. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Rockgenre, I just finished copy-editing this article, so the copyvio concern should be sorted out now. if it's still a worry, please tell me and I'll rewrite as best as i can. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- After the note above indicating that the paraphrasing issue is closed, another editor disagrees. I think there are some issues that should be addressed. You are in the best position to address them, but I note you have not edited since March. I may come back to this after looking at other open issues; if you are still active, I hope you will contribute.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
GA reassessment
[edit]Billion Dollar Babies, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--Retrohead (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of JPT Scare Band for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JPT Scare Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Primevil (band) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primevil (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.