User talk:Rtyq2

Archives

Old messages

Cool. Thanks for letting me know!

K50 Dude..........(TALK PAGE)

Regarding this edit, I would ask you to please take much more care when referring to an editor's good-faith contributions. For a new editor to spend a lot of time writing a referenced article in an area where Wikipedia is weak, and then to have their contribution labelled "unsalvageably incoherent" and "patent nonsense" within 4 minutes of submission... well... that's no way to make a new editor feel welcome. I appreciate that it's easy to make mistakes when you're making a lot of edits quickly, but please remember that you're dealing with real people who have volunteered their free time. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 12:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's true Madirox2222 (talk) 02:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, user page vandalism. Funny how it's the little things you miss when you're away from wikipedia for a while. ;-) Thanks for the cleanup. --fvw* 02:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I'll watch his edits for a little bit in case he continues. Rtyq2 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Re: this edit, don't do anything hateful, just add it back somewhere else instead of deleting it! Also, I've replaced the second ref as it confirms the first, and either might become inaccessible; extensive refs are not generally considered a problem :) -- Quiddity (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		Huge thanks to you both, for all the patience and work put in at Amon Tobin. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Rtyq2. You've been doing a beautiful job on improving the article and I admire your willingness to work on the article. (I wonder what happened to the nominator?) It really is almost there. Just a few more things to take care of. Concerning the rationale for the image, don't worry about it. I'll take care of that tonight. If you wish to learn more about it, just click on the other images to see how the rationales are done because those ones are okay, as far as I'm concerned. Just keep working on the references section of the GA review and it'll be finished. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 18:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a tricky one. It seems like Tobin may have a song heard in the film but that it wasn't put onto the official commercially-released soundtrack. I took a look at Tobin's discography on Allmusic.com and it says that that particular song ("Saboteur") was not featured on the soundtrack for the film either. Since IMDb is not a particularly reliable reference (although I have seen it used in FAs), you may, unfortunately, have to remove the information if a source cannot be found. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 18:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what. I actually own The Italian Job. What I'll do is take a look at it tonight (after my finals...ugh) and if the song is listed in the credits, we can cite the actual film. I tried to do a search for information on the Internet and turned up nothing, so the video may be our only chance of keeping this information in the article. So, for now, just focus on the other things on the list and don't worry about this particular citation. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 18:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I crashed and burned after my 4-hour final last night. As far as the website goes, I was concerned that since the information was labeled "Current", that it might be updated too often and the corresponding information would be pushed out within a few months. After looking at it, it seems that their information goes back almost two years, so it looks like it's okay to use. As far as format, just use the regular "cite web" template and put the address of the website; in small writing, I would write something like "Current > News". Make sure you input a date for the information (i.e. "2008-12-08"). I'll take a look at the citation after you've put it in the article and tweak it out if need be. I also incorporated the reference from The Italian Job into the article to support the related information, so that is finished. And I will be working on the rationale for the image later on today. Again, sorry about the late response. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For all of your hard work on improving the Amon Tobin article. – Ms. Sarita Confer 03:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. And ooh...another barnstar! You did some wonderful work on the article. If you ever need help with bettering it (or if you have GA nominations in the future and want me to review them), let me know and I'll come help you out! It was a pleasure working with you. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 03:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for all your work on getting Amon Tobin promoted to GA-class. I took an extended hiatus during this semester, but it was great to come back and see the article with all those shiny green logos on it. --Sebquantic (talk) 17:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you for this edit. That was much more work than anything I have done to the article, and the reason it got to GA class in the first place. If you ever want to improve it even further, just let me know (I've still been making little tweaks here and there to the article). Rtyq2 (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've spotted the problem that caused you to request refs. If so can you take the ref template off?Dejvid (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very muchDejvid (talk) 20:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 5	31 January 2009	About the Signpost

Large portion of articles are orphans	News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on	Dispatches: In the news
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 6	8 February 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more	Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ted (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Rtyq2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Aime (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Aime (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bessemer Cocktail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album-no cd was even made for it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Junior Glue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non nontable album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Junior Glue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pure Rock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rtyq2,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]