User talk:RyanGerbil10

This user left Wikipedia. RyanGerbil10 has not edited Wikipedia since August 16, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

16 December 2004 – 23 May 2006 24 May 2006 – 26 June 2006 26 June 2006 – 26 July 2006 27 July 2006 – 7 August 2006 8 August 2006 – 2 September 2006 3 September 2006 – 2 October 2006 3 October 2006 – 31 October 2006 1 November 2006 – 12 December 2006 13 December 2006 – 15 January 2007 16 January 2007 – 14 February 2007 15 February 2007 – 11 April 2007 12 April 2007 – 29 May 2007 30 May 2007 – 10 July 2007 11 July 2007 – 9 September 2007 10 September 2007 – 21 September 2007 22 September 2007 – 5 November 2007 6 November 2007 – 30 November 2007 1 December 2007 – 9 January 2008 10 January 2008 – 3 February 2008 4 February 2008 – 13 March 2008 14 March 2008 – 23 April 2008 24 April 2008 – 15 December 2008 16 December 2008 – 13 March 2009

English spoken here | Wir sprechen Deutsch | Nosotros hablamos español | On parle français | Мы говорим по-ру��ски | Türkçe dili biliyoruz

Welcome to my talk page! Please imagine that the following is set to a catchy song:

Believe it or not, RyanGerbil10 isn't here,

Please leave a message at the bottom.

If I were here, I'd pick up my AIM

Where could I be?

Believe it or not, I'm not here.

Talk Page Policy: Feel free to leave abusive comments. I'll remove them. However, when a particular version of my talk page is archived, I add all of the abusive and removed comments back (in proper chronological order, or course) in the interest of preserving all information. Thanks!

Would you be tempted to list Template:Internet memes for deletion again? Your statement at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_November_30 still holds true. I think it was kept due to WP:INTERESTING/WP:LIKE/WP:USEFUL votes and the original problem wasn't solved.--Otterathome (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Missler (4th nomination). Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing RyanGerbil10 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! SparksBoy (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryan,

I recently translated the article de:Mikrotom to Microtome. I am not a fluent german speaker, and would appreciate if you are able to cast your eye over my work, correcting it as needed. I found your page by Wikipedia:Translators_available#German-to-English and saw the comment about lots of free time :). If you don't have time to do this, please let me know and I will drop a line on another translator's page. Thanks. User A1 (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You had previously reviewed Family Guy for FAC. The article has been nominated again, and the review page can be found here. Thanks. Ωphois 14:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, RyanGerbil10, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

File:18th Birthday.jpg

MisterWiki talk contribs 00:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help us translate Persepolis to Azerbaijani.Shahin (talk) 11:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a GA Reassessment of the Litchfield Towers article as part of the GA Sweeps project. My review can be found here. I have found that the artice does not meet the current GA Criteria. As such I have put the article on hold for a week and I am notifying all interested projects and editors. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had deleted this in the past. Was there a reason? I couldn't find the reasons why. I would think it would be a good idea given the numerous things he has been involved in. Of course I am just talking about ideas and am ignorant of any possible wikipedia policies about templates. Thanks! Arnabdas (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing RyanGerbil10 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust Talk Contribs 00:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RyanGerbil10! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 503 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Laith Al-Deen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been brought to the attention to this, where you have removed the {{Non-free Microsoft software screenshot}} template as a result of the TfD, but have not replaced it with a suitable tag (namely {{Non-free software screenshot}}), which is the reason for a CSD on the file in question a few days ago. Now, I have added the relevant tag, and I will AGF as I assume that you had no ill intent in doing so, but should I be aware of any other files that you have done the same to, so that I can add the relevant tags so they do not end up being unnecessarily deleted? Thanks. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 06:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, übersetzt du für wiki? Habe dich hier gefunden. Würde mich freuen, wenn du dich meldest. Bis bald--Veden11 (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RyanGerbil10.

I am currently undergoing the painstaking process of generating quality articles concerning notable characters in the Warcraft/World of Warcraft universe. I understand from skimming the AfD archives that a great many of them once existed and were deleted primarily on the basis of being badly written and poorly sourced. I am attempting to rectify this situation. To aid in this effort, I have created a userfied version of the deleted template at User:Cjmclark/Sandbox/Warcraft/Template:Warcraft character.

This template is only being used in articles currently under development in my sandbox, but I would like to make it live in the mainspace as those articles near completion. As you are the administrator responsible for deleting the template following the discussion referenced in the subject, I would like your opinion on the regeneration of this template prior to placing it in the mainspace. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.  Cjmclark ^(Contact) 16:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pittsburgh		An invitation to join us!
		You are invited to participate in WikiProject Pittsburgh, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about the City of Pittsburgh and the surrounding Western Pennsylvania area. Please see the Pittsburgh WikiProject page for more information. See yinz there!

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back at the old mop and bucket game. Guy (Help!) 20:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw your name pop up as well, welcome back. Secret ^account 06:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate of the Rock Hill, South Carolina area is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate of the Rock Hill, South Carolina area until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Blueboy96 01:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Dear RyanGerbil10,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. (X! · talk)  · @174  ·  03:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seven years ago you took part reviewing the Knights of Columbus article when it was up for Featured Article. It passed then, but was later delisted. I've addressed the new concerns and have put it back up for consideration again. If you would be kind enough to review the article again and then offer either your support or suggestions on its new nomination page, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks! --Briancua (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iowa2004PresElection.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:LocationOfRonneburg.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies (talk) 20:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Template:Proseline has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § Template:Proseline until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 07:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]