User talk:Shyamsunder/Archive 1

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 09:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the wikiproject on history of India. Thanks.deeptrivia(talk) 05:13, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to mark your edits as minor when, but only when, they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one, or vice versa, is condsidered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the wikiproject on politics of India. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For a quick list of Bangladesh related articles, see List of Bangladesh-related topics. Thanks. --Ragib 04:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!You created a new category of Indian revolutionary freedom fighters (that, at present, contains judt one article - Azad). A similar category already exists as Category:Revolutionary movement for Indian independence where revolutionaries like Azad are already listed.

This category contains the article relating to individual revolutionaries as well as their actions like Chittagong armoury raid and Alipore bomb case.I think we do not need any further categories. And if we start such a category, please take care that all entries relating to individual revolutionaries are listed under both Category:Indian revolutionary freedom fighters and Category:Revolutionary movement for Indian independence. Thank you.--Dwaipayanc 16:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is work in progress..--Shyamsunder 12:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HI - you beat me in the creation of this article by minutes! Why don't you suggest an interesting fact from it on Template:DYK. Mind you, the article would have to be larger, and not a stub. Rama's Arrow 04:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks .I know the information is not sufficient.I will expand it as time permits .You may also add additional information ...--Shyamsunder 9:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Greetings, the holi-hangover continues! --Bhadani 07:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shyamsunder, there is no difficulty to do so. For attaching an image to the article which are already used on another article, click on the image and go to the image page. Use those images which are in proper license, like GFDL, PD, CC. Let's say, Image name is Example.jpg. If you want to put this image on the article right side that seems not sp big in size, use - [[Image:Example.jpg|200px|right|Image title]. If you want to put a caption with the image use - [[Image:Example.jpg|thumb|150px|right|Image title]]. To learn more about wiki please click on a particular article and see how it has been used on it and follow the same. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 07:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shyamsunder for categorizing many of articles contributed by me. You have done a good contribution in this matter. You have started liking the place. There are many things in Rajasthan which are untouched so far. You can take up those things. burdak 15:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I have expanded Indira Gandhi Canal article. You can see it and expand further. Thanks burdak 06:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyam, I just want to point out that Category:Rajputs is already a sub-category of Category:History of Rajasthan. If you put the History of Rajasthan category on pages already in the sub-category, that is a double entry, both needless and not good. In general you should see the subcategories to be sure of this in other cases also. Thank you and see you around WP. ImpuMozhi 14:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shyamsunder, I strongly question the usefulness of your category "Films with a strong Muslim background". That phrase makes less sense the more one thinks about it. What is a strong Muslim background? The Taj Mahal? If I filmed a dance about Krishna and the gopis in front of the Taj Mahal, would that be a film with a strong Muslim background? What if all the cast and crew are Muslim but the movie is about Mirabai? Since Fida and Sarfarosh are about terrorism, are they films with a Muslim background? What about any film with a Muslim in it?

I have seen the term "Muslim social" used for films about the domestic lives of Indian Muslims. Then there are historical films which will often feature Mughals. I'm not sure one should conflate Muslim socials, if that's a useful term, and films about Mughals. Nor am I sure that even these amended categories make any sense. Perhaps we should be discussing this over at WP:INCINE, where there are many editors interested in films. Zora 03:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Shyamsunder, I just read your stub on Mohsina Kidwai and helped clean it up a bit. A common problem, spacing between periods and new sentances was placed two or three times in your article. If you could just remember this it would make things look a lot cleaner in future. Thanks for that! JRA WestyQld2 11:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out that the stubs exists, I will try to clean up the pages. IrfanAli 09:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I have expanded and improved the article on Kailash Sankhala. You will like it. Any more suggestions to improve are welcome. burdak 03:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I have created two articles on Rajasthan related topics Pabuji and Bhopa. You may like to categorize them. Thanks burdak 17:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done .Shyamsunder 10:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I have seen both and done some minor corrections. Hope you will like. Good articles. Keep it up. burdak 03:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged both articles on Kan Singh. Thanks. burdak 16:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got the info that Sriram Singh was born in Badnagar in Rajastan from the book Great Indian Olympians (the first ref. mentioned in that article). But Ganesh has created an article which talks about Badnagar in MP. Do you know whether there is a Badnagar in Rajastan as well, or if the book is in error ? Tintin (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tintin (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do a small amount of bookkeeping/accounting work myself, and my partner and I just solved a rather tricky situation. We were then curious how many other accountants might have been able to solve it.

The situation is this:

At the end of its fiscal year, a company is moving its books from one file to another in their chosen accounting software that does not have an easy splitting method. This means that any outstanding cheques that were written in the old fiscal year and will be cashed in the new year will need special consideration.

Let us assume a very simple case in which for one given bank account at the end of the fisal year has a balance at the banking institution of $10,000 and there is one outstanding cheque of $2000 causing the accounting software to have a balance of $8000. The balance carried forward to the new file is $8000 (also this opening balance transaction is deemed reconciled in the new file).

Now we assume that a number of transations have taken place in the new fiscal year having a total effect of -$1000, and that the books need to be reconciled again at this point. With the bank claiming $9000 and the books saying $7000, how can you reconcile? CG janitor 01:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, nothing needs to be done .When the outstanding cheques are presented for payment at the banks , the balance with them will automatically come down to match with the balance as in the client's bank book/ledger in accounting software.Till then the outstanding cheques will appear in the bank reconciliation .This is not an unusual situation.The difference between the balance as per the client's books and the banks' books may also be caused by the cheques/instruments deposited by the client but not yet credited/collected by the bank.In that situation the balance as per the bank would be lower than what you get in your account books ( accounting software).

If you indeed wish to have the same balance at both places at any point of time you may simply reverse the outstanding transactions before/ on that date and pass journals again in next period/year-or simply do a reversing journal-most accounting software do provide reversing journals functionality.

Hope this helps. Shyamsunder 14:12, 08 July 2006(UTC)

Hi Syamsunder, a number of Jat clans have been listed for deletion, see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abusaria

I request to go there and vote note to delete. It will be a bad trend. Kindly do some thing. The clans are are common in many religions and we get history searched and expanded this way. So no clan of any caste or religion be deleted. So do the need ful at URL I refered. thanks burdak 15:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw you at above AfD, and dropped in to say hello. We had not talked for a long time. --Bhadani 12:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Syamsunder The article on Justice Kan Singh Parihar is listed for deletion. Go to URL Please raise the voice to keep. Thanks for your earlier comments on Indian clans. We could save them from deletion. burdak 03:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your Oppose vote on Ambuj.Saxena's RfA. Please provide a stronger reason/case and more evidence of your decision or the closing bureaucrat may not take your vote into consideration before closing the RfA.--Andeh 00:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Shyamsunder,

I really appreciate your’s & LRBurdak’s efforts. We tried our best to save article regarding Justice Kan Singh Parihar. Don’t worry, Sun always shines, immature cloud comes and goes. That is very little thing.

I would like to bring it to your attention that Ambuj.Saxena has altered “List of notable people from Jodhpur”. I think without having knowledge of the notable people from Jodhpur he is deliberately vandalizing the list. He has removed titles from the names of people listed. In my opinion that is totally wrong because these people are well known with their titles. It may be confusing because many other people may have similar name. For example Major Shaitan Singh (Param Veer Chakra) is popularly known as Major Shaitan Singh not just Shaitan Singh.

PS:- I really appreciate you and Mr. LRBurdak for your creative writings.

Thanks. (Jodmar 01:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

---

Shyam, Thanks for your help with merging Ganeshbot articles. I have a few suggestions for you,

• Please do not move sandbox articles to article space. Copy and paste them.
• When merging sandbox information to the main article, please add the infobox too.
• When you need to disambiguate, use braces instead of comma. See Una (Gujarat). If time permits, add dab links.
• After a merge, Please strike out the city on User:Ganeshbot/Not created page and add the original artice link.
• Please read the introduction section on User:Ganeshbot/Not created page.

Please let me know if have any questions. - Ganeshk (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I need a help from you. User AED has listed an article (biography) about me for deletion. Following that there has been comments like "non-notable" "exam-cram" "limited shelf life". How am I to oppose it. If it is an article, we can remove that citing lack of sources. I was pushed into editing the article only for the past 2 days after that. Initially the reason given for delete was Not-notable. When I gave enough proof that I have written 6 medical text books [1] they have changed the accusation into Vanity. And one user have voted three times for it to be deleted. Another doctor from Delhi (may be some one who knows me in real world and does not like me) has gone to the extent of telling that no one knows about me

I understand that I should not write an article about me. You should note that the article was not written by me. Hence I am not able to comprehend the Vanity Issue. My problem is not with deleting or keeping it. It is regarding to the mud sligning that has been happening in the AFD Debate of various individuals (as well as corporates / Organisations etc) after nominating the article for debate in the recent past and unfortunately I am a victim now. If it is an article, we can remove that citing lack of sources. But the baseless insulting comments made here will stay.Doctor Bruno 13:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shyamsunder,

I just insert two pictures of Jodhpur (1) Panoramic view of Jodhpur at night (2) View of the Rajasthan High Court, Sardar museum in Umaid Park and upper right is Jodhpur fort in 1960. Hope you would like it. With best wishes. (Jodmar 06:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Perhaps you can answer a few questions; I noticed you have contributed to the Sikhism pages.

I am having a difficult time understanding exactly what Sikhism is. After reading almost every article about it on Wikipedia, it appears as though Sikhism has very little structure. The religion basically encompasses different things from different religions, renamed using Indian terms. Other than being a "good person," there seems to be little substance. I am an Orthodox Jew. Hope to hear from you soon. (DRosenbach 01:22, 22 August 2006 (USA))

I noticed in the Vijaya Mehta page you added some information on Pestonjee. I would like to commend you for the information on a great film but unfortunately it is a word-for-word copy of the teaser available on the Netflix site and in all probability a copyright infringement. Therefore I have deleted it. Feel free to expand the Pestonjee article in your own words. Take care. --Antorjal 02:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I noticed you restored a section to the INdian NAtional Congress article. I think you should take another look at it, as it appears that section definitely violates WP:OR and possibly NPOV. I'm letting you know to explain the revert I performed. Perhaps its best to let that bit go. Hornplease 07:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I just saw your entry to DYK. The nomination is very interesting but unlikely to go through:

• Its a one line article, basically a stub which is not allowed.
• Better sources need to be put in. A blog and a personal incomplete list will not be taken as good sources. The Hindu link does not have any mention about the fact that you put in DYK. Please refine the article ASAP to increase the chances of the article getting through -- Lost^(talk) 16:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now enhanced the article and added many links .Does It look good now for DYK.Shyamsunder 10:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it looks better now. You may like to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography to look for further guidelines on how to improve the article. -- Lost^(talk) 11:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nivedita Bhasin, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 19:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!! -- Lost^(talk) 19:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This pertains to other anti-Hindu pogroms in NWFP and Punjab as a consequence of Direct Action Day. I managed to put it in based on whatever little refs I could find online. Could you suggest some books I could see for additional data (exact death-toll, specific incidents etc.)?Hkelkar 20:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The books on partition of India provide the information and graphic narration .There are lots of them . I will provide the titles to you soon.Thanks .)?Shyamsunder 09:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some info from books I got from library regarding Noakhali pogrom on Direct Action Day. If you have the time then plz peruse the article and make additions of any information that you may have. Thanks.Hkelkar 11:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I am trying to expand the stub on G.H. Ojha but I have been autoblocked by Glen S. Can you help me getting unblocked?SUSHRUTA 04:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inserting the demands for citations in some places in Indira Gandhi. However, you have asked for citations for such statements as "Acharya Kriplani and JP toured the North calling for her resignation.", and many many others. Some of these have dozens of citations available following a simple google search. I urge you to insert citations yourself if at all possible. Also, about the Congress High Command article: Note, the decision was summarised by the closing admin as 'keep' and 'merge'. The term is mentioned on the CWC page, so the merging is complete. Hornplease 08:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent creations of important events in Indian political history. Subjects such as the Bhagalpur blindings are under-represented on WP. I hope you will continue to work on them and add information as and when you can. Hornplease 00:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the stub on Rana Kumbha. I have been unable to format the article completely. Could you have a look and make the changes? Thanks.SUSHRUTA 00:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Shyamsunder 13:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the stub as much as I can. Have a look at it some time. Again, thanks for your prompt assistance. SUSHRUTA 01:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guna (Lok Sabha Constituency). I dont know where you get the results for elections, could you fill out the page in the same manner as the other constituencies?Bakaman _Bakatalk 02:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The user ShyamBihari has prepared these constituency wise templates .He may not have finished all Lok Sabha constituencies .I do not know how to fill in.You may perhaps send him a message . Shyamsunder 015:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I just went through the nom. I think its good and likely to go through. Cant help much with the article right now as I am not online often. Carry on the good work. Looking forward to many more DYKs from you!! -- Lost^(talk) 19:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article was an excellent read. Looks like Aksi great used his magic DYK touch to add to it. Congratulations on the DYK -- Samir धर्म 01:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On October 19, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vishnu Bhagwat, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Glad to have been a help to you. Please do create more articles like these. Don't worry about the formatting. You can just leave a message on my talk page when you want me to look at any article you create. - Aksi_great (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you know about Diwali? I wish you All The Best on the ocasion of the Indian festival of light, Diwali. I am sure that the light of hope, confidence, and all positive attributes shall always remain inside you – lighting your path and guiding you to attain higher and higher levels of excellence in all your endevours! And, ID Mubarak too. All the best! --Bhadani 17:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite a reliable source to back up your recent edit to Bajrang Dal [2]. Plus, please only refer to the subject of the article and not others.Thanks per WP:RS and WP:CITE.Hkelkar 19:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are fine. I have compiled and enhanced Glossary of terms in Hinduism. Have a look. It is compilation from many sources. You would like to add more. Yesterday I came to know that List of famous Jats is proposed for deletion. Kindly go and vote there. I found you have created some lists. It will be not in good taste if this way lists are being deleted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_famous_Jats burdak 14:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics#Caste_lists_vs._Caste_cats for discussion on this.Bakaman _Bakatalk 07:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear shyam sunder ji,recently you add in bhinmal-that in the peoples from bhinmal "Many of them are hawkers at Shuklaji street in Central Mumbai".THIS IS ABUSING AND INSULTING of Bhinmal & its peoples.why you add this wrong & abusing information on wikipedia. From Bhinmal no one are hawkers at shuklaji street,mumbai,all the people of bhinmal have their own shop in this area.For your kind information some legends made by people of Bhinmal are as follows- Nahar Amrit shakti,pavai-mumbai construct by nahar group,Apsara multy plex at Grant road,mumbai construct by Govani group,Sarvoday parshwanath nagar,mulund-mumbai construct by nahar & seth group,attria shopping mall,worli-mumbai construct by vardhan group,Mahavideha Bhinmal Dham,Palitana-Gujrat,construct by Bafna group.they all are from bhinmal. please think on it and reply me-sanjaybafnaji@yahoo.co.in SANJAYBAFNA

Hi Shyamsunder, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ashish here...i m new at wikipedia...but nw i m very crazy abt this....i m frm bikaner....tell sm thng abt u...u can mail me at simplyakm@gmail.com.i m also on orkut...the owner of ECB::Engineering College Bikaner Community...with the name of AKM...Aashish Kumar Maheshwari Aashish K Maheshwari

Re his place of birth, http://sportal.nic.in/legenddetails.asp?sno=587&moduleid=&maincatid=5&subid=0&comid=55 says it is Bad*a*nagar, while "Great Indian Olympians" has it as Badnagar (I read it in a bookshop and then came home and wrote the article, so it is possible that it is my typo). Which is correct ? Tintin (talk) 14:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tintin (talk) 13:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jain Vishva Bharti Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tgies 08:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have written an article on the 'Dalpat Vilas'. i wish to place it in the categories History of Rajasthan|Hisory of Bikaner. Could you help?

Thanks for all the help SUSHRUTA 13:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be alright with merging the article you started on List of terrorist incidents in Pakistan into the article Terrorism in Pakistan? KazakhPol 22:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. KazakhPol 19:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shyamsunder,

I insert two pictures of Mandore hope you would like it. With best wishes for Coming Year 2007. HAPPY NEW YEAR | (Jodmar 04:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bhanu Prakash Mirdha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Bhanu Prakash Mirdha. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. EMT1871 17:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have learnt that Raghuvendra Mirdha is Rajasthan Pradesh Congress Committee Executive Member. Most importantly Raghuvendra Mirdha was the only one present with Sonia Gandhi visited Parasram Maderna at his residence last year. This indicates his notability. burdak 03:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message on Rana Udai Singh, for the present I need to take care of some issues in my non cyberspace life. I do appreciate you thinking of me.SUSHRUTA 20:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, External links are not References. They fulfill different functions - See WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CITE. Please do not remove unsourced tags until you provide references. I fixed some of the wikifying, as I notieed you removed that tag also. But it needs more wikifying. You should fix tag problems before removing them. It can be considered vandalism if you continue doin that. Thanks, Mattisse 05:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting the Category:Economy of Andhra Pradesh on the Jatropha incentives in India article. That gave me the idea to put more India categories on it. A merge has been proposed with the Jatropha article. I keep trying to explain that the article is about India's energy policies and not about the plant! So, thanks! Sincerely, --Mattisse 01:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Not sure about the Marxist journalist tag. She is socialist, but whether that makes her Marxist is debateable. She was/is a Janata Dal member, but never CPI. Mikeslackenerny 08:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC). It is per her left leaning views/writings as I read in the article .Shyamsunder 20:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She is definately left-leaning. Not sure if that qualifies her as Marxist. That would term pro-Left American writers to be Marxist too, na? Will read up more on that and comment again.

Mikeslackenerny 08:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your old edits to issues related to Direct Action Day and would like to get your attention to a matter of serious misrepresentation:

A new user named

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Teabing-Leigh

has started a bunch of bullshit POV forks based on unreliable pakistani propaganda websites and afrocentric pseudohistory propaganda

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_racism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahomed_Ali_Jinnah%27s_11th_August_speech http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_views_on_race

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Civil_Disobedience_Movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Direct_Action_Day

are both POV forks of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Action_Day

Some of them have been AfD'ed, but others remain.I suggest in the strongest terms that these articles be deleted immediately. The references cited in Direct Action Day by this editor are falsely represented by him and not in the citations given (I am well-familiar with them). In contrast, he has removed numerous references that did, in fact, exist before that were reliable.

In particular, this website: http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html

cited by him across these numerous articles,

Is an Afrocentric pseudohistory website with no mainstream credibility.

Thanks for your attention. Kjartan8 12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt see that PFJ&K cat I will put a db ticker on the one i created.Bakaman 00:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw the query you left at Bhadaniji's talk page. There is such a tool available, I don't know if it still works. See this. You have to ask Interiot to generate a report for you. - Aksi_great (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bhadaniji, Kaise hai aap. Can you please help me.I wish to have the lists of all the artilces I started and of all the categories I created.Is there any wiki tool to get these lists .If not what is the best way to compile such lists in short time. I did not keep record and I now wish to put the names of such articles and categories on my user page. Shyamsunder 17:24, 09 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Main thik hun (I am fine). Talking to you after a long gap perhaps. I think perhaps there is no such tool fully operational right now though I am not sure - please see above the comments by Great. However, in case, you have kept the pages your created / initiated under your watchlist, you may see them one by one and, and identify the same and note them on your user page for your record. In case, you have missed them to keep under your watch, it is going to be a difficult task as you will have to see all your contributions from the very beginning, and identify the pages started/ initiated by you. In the process, you may forget (like many others) about some pages which you may have started/ inititated. But, it is ok - everyone forgets such things including me. Finally, such a list may give a sense of satisfaction, and may prompt one to develop the pages started/ initiated by you - but, even if one is able to have a complete list of such pages, one should not worry: one should continue to value add to wikipedia. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tnx for creating and populating the category.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  03:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated List of postal codes in Rajasthan, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postal codes in India and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The anti-Hinduism category is being considered for deletion here. I thought you might want to weigh in on the discussion. It is part of a campaign to delete all of the categories that relate to religous based bigotry. Mamalujo 18:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are many pages about 'anti-Christian' violence in India. 59.93.32.61 (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I saw you blanked the Hindu literature redirect. I agree that it at the moment it is highly mistaken and should not redirect to Hindi literature, but blanking or deletion is not answer. I have opened a discussion at Redirects for discussion on what to do with it, in which your opinion would be very welcome. Qwghlm 09:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Very nice article. There is much scope for improvement though. Can you split the article into different sections? The lead is ok for now, I will try and expand it later. I have thought of the following sections - Background (which will give history of terrorism in Kashmir up to that point), Kidnapping, Negotiation (the Kidnapping and Negotiation sections could be combined for now) and finally the Impact section. The impact section is very important as it is said everywhere that this incident lead to a drastic rise in terrorism in Kashmir, and that if the government had not given in at that point then things would have been different. Also, please add references to the sentences where needed as I have done in the lead. I have the article on my watchlist so I will keep on copyediting as you expand the article. Regards, - Aksi_great (talk) 05:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You previously asked on my talk page about getting a list of articles you'd created. I recently figured out how to get this report working again, so here's your list. --Interiot 21:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this [[3]].IP198 02:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been able to find anything online about Narsingh Lal Kirado, either under that name or under the name "Manorji". Could you help? DS 14:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the DYK. Sorry I couldn't help. I had semester end exams which got over just today. - Aksi_great (talk) 10:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also apologize for not assisting more; the DYK is great. Well done -- Samir 07:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shyamsunder, please have a look at Direct Action Day page...some muslim leaguers ( they are still alive ) are insisting it is 'one sided' and seems to funded by "hindu fundamentalists". This is their usual statergy : they are always on offensive.

Please bring up the undisputable facts into light and shut these cranks up...Wikipedia should be free from such confusions...Jon Ascton

please don't mind but were you all sleeping for past two years. now only its flashing in your head that tourism section is also required. nobody pointed out for articles like west bengal for tourism section. Sushant gupta (talk · contribs) 04:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this page! It may help if you were to put in the references from the Mayawati article (just cut and paste from the edit window). Copying from the formatted wikipedia window gives only a number like [3]...

Thanks! mukerjee (talk) 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article 1981 Meenakshipuram conversion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.132.175.217 17:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a political party in India. Since you are knowledgeable on Indian politics, I was hoping you can help me on this page.Bakaman 00:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Will try to improve it .Shyamsunder 12:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be a stub, it has to be a full-fledged article. I'll see what I can do.Bakaman 16:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to your edit summary here, please read the definition of vandalism and remember that spurious accusations are considered very inappropriate. Hornplease 02:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsundar, There is a need to improve the Rajasthan page. The art, culture and tradition sections need to be expanded and improved. Can you spare some time. --burdak 05:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Indian Wahabi movement, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nkv 17:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new user, I have been contributing to the Pratibha Patil (and related) article, especially the controversy section. We both have reverted / refined each others edit to try and derive a NPOV for the controversy section, but haven't been entirely successful. Perhaps we can discuss and derive a consensus together? Indusv 20:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Pratibha Patil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Wwowbaby 17:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pehle main Indian Wikipedians es page pe regularly dikhte they per ab nahin, koi khaas baat. Vjdchauhan 14:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, you have made immense contribution to India related pages both by creating pages as well by categorizing them. I am pretty below average when it comes to creating pages so can you pls have a look at Red links in below pages and create articles out of them. Thanks a lot, regards, Vjdchauhan 13:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

• Chief Justice of India
• Chief Election Commissioner of India
• Chief of Army Staff of the Indian Army
• Chief of the Air Staff (India)
• Chief of Naval Staff of the Indian Navy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Ajit Pal Singh, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://punjabilok.com/misc/sports/ajit_pal_singh.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hanuman Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rjd0060 01:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shyamsunder: Thank you for your suggestion about what to do about this article. I have taken your advice about listing it on the Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard. Let's hope someone can suggest something constructive. Cheers, John Hill 04:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Shyamsunder ! Can you write few lines in favour of retaining article on Jangladesh on Wikipedia. It is ancient region mentioned since vedic and Mahabharata times. It is must to retain ancient places for knowledge and developing the history of region. Mr John Hill has nominated it for deletion. Pl see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jangladesh

--burdak 16:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for submitting some categories for discussion. I wanted to note that you should always sign your comments. Also, your addition was ill-formatted. If you follow the procedure at WP:CFD#Procedure, you can see step III provides a template that you can fill out, and it will automatically format your proposal for you. If you need further help with future CfD, please ask. The ones you recently listed have already been fixed by other users. Thanks.-Andrew c ^[talk] 14:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Syamsunder P. C. Chandawat has been tagged for deletion. Pl see and comment. --burdak 13:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sorry to disappoint you, but...

An article that you have been involved in editing, Anjana Mishra rape case, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjana Mishra rape case. Thank you. Tazmaniacs 23:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping on the H.R. Khanna article. mukerjee (talk) 02:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a great candidate for DYK. Makes us feel proud of our heroes. Will try to edit tonight/ tomorrow. Regards — Lost^(talk) 03:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was wondering if you would review my article. I am a new user and was wondering if you could help me make mine better. I just wrote the article national dairy checkoff. thank you (Bakekari 14:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Syamsunder ! You had put prod tag on Pema Ram article. I have got some of his books and reading them. Very soon I will expand the article. If you know about the History of Rajasthan, it is very much in dark. Dr Pema Ram has published lot of content on History of Rajasthan and that will be of great use. It is too early to put a such a prod tag on developing articles. We have to keep some patience. Thanks. Happy Diwali !!! burdak 17:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Incumbent Indian Deputy Chief Ministers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on A.S. Atwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. UtherSRG (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jaynarayan Vyas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 02:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have worked in religious categorizations on india articles, I would like to invite you to this discussion.Bakaman 02:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian nationalist political parties, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Hi Shyam,

Mein aajkal Wikipedia pe contribute nahin kar raha hoon, per visit phir bhee karta rehta hoon aur tumhaare contribution ko check karte rehta hoon kyonkee mujhe lagta hai kee hum dono kaafi hadh tak similar kind of pages/category mein interested rehte they.

Yaar maine IT Sector Job se resign kar diya hai (was lately woking as Software Development Manager in Quark, Inc., Mohali, Punjab) aur full time Indian politics mein jaa raha hoon Uttar Pradesh se, dekho kyaa banta hai. Mera actual naam Sushil Chauhan hai.

Mein phir bhee Wikipedia ke liye committed rahoonga per not necessariyl as editor per dekhta hoon kee kisi aur tarah se contribute kar sakoon e.g. Wikipedia India Chapter open karwaane mein yaa kisi aur tarah se.

Aur batao kyaa chal raha hai.

Chalo bye, Vjdchauhan (talk) 12:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Pls check my reply at my talk page. Vjdchauhan (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Swadesh Chatterjee, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.calcuttaweb.com/nri/Swadesh_Chatterjee.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hubli Maidan controversy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slp1 (talk) 11:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shyamsunderji

Would appreciate your help in Singh article.

Gorkhali (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice you reverted my redirect of Bihari Muslims into Stranded Pakistanis. These articles cover the same ground so there should only be one; I had added to Stranded Pakistanis the content from Bihari Muslims that was not already there. I don’t mind what name the combined article has — I used Stranded Pakistanis only because that article is longer than the other and is linked from more articles. Changing the name can be discussed on its Talk: page and/or at Requested Moves, but having two articles is a Content Fork. Regards, jnestorius^(talk) 12:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello... There's a discussion happening to decide the future of Stranded Pakistanis, Biharis or Bihari Muslims. These three are surely going to be merged (no use having three articles about the same thing). But the final title may not be something you'd prefer. Since you have worked so hard on this group of people, I guess, you'd like to say a thing or two here, where the discussion is taking place. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 13:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on A. Rameswami Mudaliar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I find that the you have deleted the entire paragraph about the achievements of author Vir Singh which comprises of his contributions to various history conferences. It is simply not the participation but his contributions in form of articles published in these conferences is important. This shows their notability also. These are simply facts. The interested history scholars can consult the proceedings of those history congresses or conferences for further consultations. These have links to various other articles. More over This article was scanned earlier and put for deletion but the administrators decided to keep the article in totality. Hence deletion amounts vandalism. Similarly you have deleted from other author Pema Ram. If somebody feels some facts are unwanted it should be discussed first on its talk page. I have put notes on the talk pages of these articles. I therefore restored the deleted content from these articles. Do not delete without discussion. Hope for your positive contributions. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LRBurdak (talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Chamcha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shaym, Regarding the notability tag added here, you are requested to explain the reason why tagged it at the talk page of the article. The tag clearly says that The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject. Don't you think that The Hindu & Indian Express are reliable third-party sources?. The subject is a notable topic in Kerala, apart from online references, a bunch of offline sources also available. So there is no doubt about notability at all. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harmik Singh, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://sportal.nic.in/legenddetails.asp?sno=725&moduleid=&maincatid=41&subid=0&comid=55. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian American football players has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 04:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shyamsunder, you are doing a great job. Its really nice to see how much you contribute. Keep up the good work, maybe we can collaborate on some of the articles related to India. As you know there is so much lacking in our articles when compared to others. Cheers!Randhirreddy 12:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fakhruddin T. Khorakiwala, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fakhruddin T. Khorakiwala. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shyamsunder. How are you? Thank you for your contributions to the article 1977 Andhra Pradesh cyclone. I really appreciate your contributions. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/It's new there is a new article Deendar Anjuman, which is attributed to Dwaipayan but the history sheet says it is yours. I think there is a mistake somewhere. Please check. Regards. - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 03:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently created the article, India women's national field hockey team. Since you created or worked on biographies for some of the team's players, I thought you might be interested in helping to develop the article. -Classicfilms (talk) 01:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Sorrow and the Terror: The Haunting Legacy of the Air India Tragedy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sorrow and the Terror: The Haunting Legacy of the Air India Tragedy. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 12:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You remo==2005 killings of Christians in Nigeria==

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2005 killings of Christians in Nigeria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of 2005 killings of Christians in Nigeria. Rjhatl (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You removed the deletion tag but did not provide any evidence that the article is notable at all. Please provide evidence that this article is notable by citing nonbiased news reports (eg; from Nigerian or International newspapers) rather than editorials. Rjhatl (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Cash for fatwas scandal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cash for fatwas scandal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is just a courtesy notice regarding the article. Since you either edited the article, or participated in talk page of the article, I thought you might be interested. --vi5in^[talk] 16:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geography of Rajasthan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rajasthan-tourism.biz/geography.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Geography of Rajasthan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 10:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to create a Krishna centered Hinduism project

Proposed project - Krishna worshipers WikiProject Invitation - lets create unity in diversity! Proposal for discussion - May 2008 Please, say what you think about it: Just a few words... what may interest you and attract other editors across a wider spectrum of Krishna-centered or connected traditions in Hinduism? Go on over to our new project discussion page Talk:Krishna/Krishna worshipers. We need to talk it over! Look over the complete list of proposed traditions forming the scope of the project - this list is by far not complete, please add your favorites and discuss! From ancient to modern You can join and make a difference! This is an informal invitation to join a joint cross boundary venture. You and your friends are invited to discuss and comment on the proposal of new Krishna centered project. There are many traditions where Krishna is worshiped and His names revered. Lets join the forces and create more of the beautiful and well resourced articles on all related subjects and traditions. The traditions are not limited to one or two, there are many and all should be given equal attention by us. Drop me a few words or lets discuss it at the discussion page. Wikidās ॐ 22:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since its just at the begging stage, please voice your opinion or put yourself on the list of editors here. Thanks, Wikidās ॐ 18:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You seem to have know how of creating categories. I tried to find it but FAQs do not tell how to make categories. Need category as said in title above. You see, Nagpur, Belgaum, Jammu, etc... are all second capitals in India and lack category for themselves. Please create one --gppande «talk» 07:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Culture of Bihar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://bihar123.googlepages.com/cultureofbihar. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Syhamsunder please refrain from editing sites that do not relate to any Brahman personalities. We do not allow duplicate Brahman to edit any of our websites. This is a free encyclopedia and i have lot of corrupt information against presidents like Shankar Dayal Sharma or Rajendra Prasad. Please note i am in New Zealand and give me a call if you want to discuss. Bebrahmin (talk) 10:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some days back you had voted keep on the WP:Articles_for_deletion/Manu_Sharma While that AfD was not resolved (1 delete, 2 redirect, 2 keep) it was closed and the article was redirected by an administrator. I have been fighting this step for some time. Pls do look at the debate at the bottom of Talk:Manu Sharma if you get a chance. Also consider these pages: Christine Beatty, Lee Boyd Malvo. I am beginning to wonder if this is discriminatory against India because many people haven't heard of Manu Sharma. (Am defeated by some syntax error below, so am leaving this comment above.) mukerjee (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO Shyamsunder/Archive 1 Please save Pakistan occupied Kashmir article from deletion. The article has been hijacked by Wikipedians of Pakistani origin who are demanding its deletion. Remember, once deleted its gonna be extremely hard to recreate it. This is not a wasted attempt because all claims in the article are well sourced. Please consider the following:

1. Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir is the term used by the Indian government, and for legal reasons followed by the media and Indian publishers

2. The term is POV on Wikipedia, but it is real, because it exists, and cannot be *deleted* away.

3. Redirecting PoK to Azad Kashmir is not the solution. Geographically, Azad Kashmir is a small region of the area labelled as PoK. Therefore, territorially speaking, it is inherently false.

4. Additionally, the term Azad, which means free, is also a POV. Free in what sense? From Indian administration?

5. As a responsible encyclopedia, it is our responsibility to mention what the term means, the area under it, who has dubbed the name, usage of the name, the reasons why it is called, and legal usage in India, Pakistan, and major countries/groups. The page should not be more than two-three paragraphs long, and must point to the articles on Jammu and Kashmir, Kashmir, the Kashmir dispute, Azad Kashmir, and FANA.

Wikipedians of Pakistani origin want this removed and replaced with just the Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas article because it speaks the truth. Anybody with an account can vote. If none please create one right away and vote for keep.

PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE BEFORE VOTING. a similar warning is on wp:india page

Please oppose the page to be deleted. It is requested by Pro Pakistani Wikipedians who want all trace of it to be vanished. Do so immediately!. Key in keep followed by reason.|}}

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		I am proud to present Shyamsunder The Categorisation Barnstar for tirelessly categorising articles under WP:IND! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 09:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your Appreciation :-) you are also doing great dear. Devessh S N Bhatta (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organizations based in India and related categories have been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 13:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know why I reverted your changes to this article. Barmer is a disambiguation page. Only the individual list entries are supposed to be linked on these pages. For more information, see WP:Disambiguation#Page style. Thanks! Auntof6 (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Murder of Swami Lakshmanananda is reading a POV against Christians. Please state purpose of article. Quotations from people in Ashram are not serving any encyclopedic objectives. Also, there are serious varifiability issues. Overall a poor editorial work. Please re-write. I can assist if you need help. Recordfreenow (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Recordfree will help? Joke of the year? Is he not a Christian POV of repute? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.32.61 (talk) 22:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had created this article solely by shifting the material from the Swami's page. Can you please help preserve it in present form. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is the problem with it? YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 04:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of editors do not like the page and are bent upon burying it. I request a watch and help at appropriate time. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I am not sure about Guru Hanuman. Not found in list of Jats. burdak (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shyam (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic 04:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shyam (actor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

IMDB filmography and bio indicate non-notable. Unable to find references in quick GS (of course, not dispositive). The referenced "famous movie" shows no indication of fame or classic status in its IMDB listing.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic 04:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Shyam (actor), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyam (actor). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongomatic 15:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyam,

We are the process of setting up a wiki with the aim of improving governance in India. We intend to monitor parliamentary activity, judicial activity, activities of Government ministries and agencies, and individual political leaders and other prominent people.

We also wish to create extensive documentation of various responsible officers in different departments of the Government, relating to civic amenities, etc so as to become a one-stop destination for people who are seeking redressal of problems they are facing etc.

I found that you are extremely active on wikipedia and clearly you love to write and classify information. We would like your help and guidance in taking our project forward. We are a non-profit. Infact, we are not even an organisation in the technical sense. We are a group of recent graduates from IIT and we're trying to build this thing.

Please do get in touch with us at webmaster [at] governindia.org; even if you would not be able to help us with the project. Your time will be much appreciated and I hope you will realise that your contributions could be very valuable for India at large.

Thanks

GovernIndia Team

Dear Shyamsunderji, Wishing You and Your Family A Happy and Prosperous New Year 2009. With Best Wishes. Jodmar (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on User:Tinucherian/Indians WP to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks. Vjdchauhan (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

your article about prashant bhushan.

i need to contact him.do you know any contact info?. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manchurian candidate (talk • contribs) 11:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I do not have his contact details. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thought I should notify you:

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of people from Tamil Nadu, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people from Tamil Nadu. Thank you.

Regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is heavily anti-Hindu, needs reediting...Jon Ascton (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi shyam, dont use the auto keyword (|auto=yes)as in Talk:Jai Krishna when they are manually assessed. This keyword is for the bots when they are auto-assessed based on some stub templates on the article . just FYI Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 10:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Shyamsunder ji.--ISKapoor (talk) 01:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Akri Fort, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Priyanka (talk) 05:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arun Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Darkmaster2004 (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found the following article on wikipedia which seems to be orphaned, I dont know how to include it into the Indian cuisine fold, thought of writing to you since you're an active experienced member. It is Multilingual list of Indian Vegetables, I categorized it under Indian cuisine, hope that helps. Lilaac (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC) The categorisation helps. Shyamsunder (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious as to why you only added those items that could be called "negative". There were also a number of "positive" items listed from the report. Was there any reason for this? Also, I'm surprised that wikinews is an acceptable source, but I have left it there for now. --Merbabu (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the recent changes to the article by User:Kransky[4], and the insertion of an op/ed by a right-wing white nationalist Australian columnist blaming Indians for the attacks and denying the 2005 Cronulla riots.70.112.206.102 (talk) 12:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm looking for a peer review for Ram Narayan. You've been involved in editing, perhaps you want to take a look? Thanks :) Hekerui (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Not an urgent enquiry, but you recently removed the category 'Rail transport in India' from the article Lifeline Express, but the edit summary doesn't explain why. Could you enlighten me, when you have a spare moment? Thanks very much. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 09:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your reply. No, I won't revert. I'm quite happy with your reasoning - just wanted to know what it was. It all makes sense! Thanks again. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 16:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Shyamsundar,

Thanks for the appreciation. I noticed this morning that you have done very positive edits. I have further edited it today since I could not do it as it was late night when I posted it on DYK. By the way are you interested in Karnataka subjects related to Architecture or Delhi monuments. Some of them, which I have drafted could be jointly posted on DYK (provided you are willing) after some additons and tweaking by you.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jaipur Kathak Kendra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not clear how this is notable, lacks 3rd party references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 23:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can u help categorization of WP:INEI ? --naveenpf (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because the Meshuchrarim are the lowest caste among the Cochin Jews. The Jews of Cochin also had a caste system, with separate sections of synagogues and endogamous groups.Pectore^talk 19:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Agriculture (Himachal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unlikely search term

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LK (talk) 07:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a section to Talk:Meghwal for discussion of a proposed move to Megh (people). If there is consensus, I wlll do the move in 7 days. Please add your comments to the talk page. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I saw your comment. I am not qualified to give an opinion - just put in the proposal as requested by the main contributor with a "vote" as an example. The three names Meghwal, Meghwar and Megh seem to be used in different places. I suppose the article should be under the most broadly used name. You may want to check the article as a whole and see if it needs overhaul. I don't know enough to judge, but suspect it is not entirely objective. It is possibly written by someone from this group in J&K who wants to give the people more history and status than is justified by the sources. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly note on Dharmendar Kanwar. I removed the prod tag because at least two of her books are in quite a few university libraries in the US, and there are several book reviews online of her works. If you still think notability isn't satisfied, feel free to take it to AfD. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

आदरणीय श्यामसुंदर जी, शुभकामनाएँ. I have supported the move of 'Meghwal' to Megh (people) on the ground that 'Joshua project' referred in the article clearly mentions them as Megh (inclusive of Meghwal). All these groups claim to have descended from Megh Rishi. I have verified from dictionaries that the words 'Meghwal' and 'Meghwar' connotes people from Megh lineage as mentioned in the article. I have seen on internet that Meghwals (from Rajasthan) and their struggle is more visible, whereas, in Punjab and J&K Meghs have made a bit of progress through reservation in government jobs but their social and political struggle is not visible. I belong to this group. I am aware of their conditions and literacy level. It does not matter much whether the article is named this way or that way. But they are people from the same origin with variety of cultural variations and local traditions.Bhagat.bb (talk)(Bharat Bhushan Bhagat 02:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Mandoli, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Dhansa. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{hangon}} template you placed on Category:Books about Indian military, because you did not provide any explanation of why you object to deletion of the category. The category is empty: that is simply a fact. If you know of articles that should be in this category but aren't, just add them to the category, and it won't be deleted. The process still has three and a half days to go before the category is ready to be deleted. Finally, even if it does get deleted, it can always be re-created later if there is a need to put articles in it. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look? It's PRODded, has two different spellings, unable to verify which one is correct... -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You must have seen Meghwal by now. If not, please see it now and improve the language where ever required. This is a special request. Also, recently a visiter number '115.113.250.2' deleted and added some material without giving any reson or citation. I have restored the previous article.Bhagat.bb (talk)--B3 16:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pannalal Barupal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the general notability guidelines - for inclusion, an article requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The only source here is a primary source, hence the article is not verifiable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ►  04:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've made some additional improvements to Wadia Ghandy & Company. If you have a company logo and other information to include in the infobox, please feel free. Cehers! <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brajlal Biyani, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indianpost.com/viewstamp.php/Alpha/BRAJLAL%20BIYANI. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links can be found here: http://www.asianetindia.com/news/held-girls-death-case_20453.html http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=9171 http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/index.php?print/id:8023 http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/8023.html

Thanks. Yusuf.Abdullah (talk) 17:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent edits!! - You helped the world today in some way... maybe a little bit, but wrong is doing nothing at all. 189.217.171.135 (talk) 01:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Historic regions of northern india has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at the recent contribs of Wikindia24x7‎ (talk · contribs). He's back at all those ridiculous cats/redirects again. After the mass clean up from a couple of months ago, it's back to the same situation. This time, there maybe a couple of legitimate articles somewhere in there, I'm just struggling to figure out which ones are OR and which ones are legitimate, especially since he doesn't use sources at all. I just undid a good bit of pagemove vandalism by him and his sock. If you can take a look at the redirects and new articles, that'd be great. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 22:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Specify for deletion of categories Alokprasad (talk) 05:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shyamsunder! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 31 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Anwara Taimur - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Bhuvaneshwari Kumari - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Sadiq Ali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Idris Hasan Latif - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Khurshed Alam Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Gulam Abbas Moontasir - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Syed Shahnawaz Hussain - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Arif Beg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Asif Ismail - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Moraad Ali Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated G. N. Patil, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. N. Patil. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abecedare (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Kisan Dhage, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisan Dhage. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abecedare (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Know Pratibha Patil, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Know Pratibha Patil (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abecedare (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaymsundar, Though I nominated the above articles for deletion, I certainly do not imagine that you created them to push any POV. In fact, if I had to guess my assumption would be that you saw the news items in 2007, and on seeing that wikipedia lacked any coverage on the subject, decided to create the articles. The fact that the articles became WP:BLP1E is I think more reflective of the news coverage at that time, than any deliberate action on your part (note, that I am not simply assuming good faith here, but basing my opinion on what I know of your editing over the years). I hope none of my statements gave an alternate impression; I'll be happy to fix them, if I missed something. Regards. Abecedare (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rereading my nomination, I think I see where I erred and have corrected the voice and tone. Hope that clarifies my view. Abecedare (talk) 02:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Girish Wagh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girish Wagh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mayuresh 03:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zafar Saifullah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP unsourced since 2006.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to help out with this? There are lots of politicians in the list and your expertise in that area would help. cheers.–SpacemanSpiff 08:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will help wherever I can.Shyamsunder (talk) 08:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you. Please though use inline citations. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 23:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder,i appreciate your work in Wikipedia but some of articles like Suryakanta Vyas looks like record,neither she has done anything significant that her name should be included in wiki.If we add each person of assemble it will just waste resource of wikipedia .I dont think it should be added. Alokprasad (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to award me a barnstar, bro. Regards Rorkadian (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Shyamsunder. I saw that You've written the articles about Surendra Kumar Kataria, Khushi Ram and some other Arjun Awardees in Basketball.
Can you write us their names written in Devanagari (in the respective articles)? Thank You in advance, Kubura (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vibrant Gujarat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Points provided within the article are not sufficient to prove notability. No references provided and only a single article links to it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MK 16:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]