Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan/Archive/April 2022

Talk & archives for WP Japan
Project talk 2006 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2020 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2021 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2022 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Task force talk/archives ↔ Baseball (1) Bibliography (1) ↔ Cinema (1) ↔ CJKV (1) ↔ Districts and municipalities (1) Gaijin tarento (1) ↔ Military history (1, 2, 3) Music (1) Mythology (1, 2, 3, 4) Owarai (1) Politics (1) Prefectures (1) Royalty & nobility (1) Science & technology (1) Shinto (1) ↔ Tokyo (1) ↔ Transwiki ↔ = joint task force
Old notice board All of 2004 Jan–Mar 2005 Apr–Jun 2005 Jul–Oct 2005 Nov–Dec 2005 Jan–Feb 2006 Feb–May 2006 Jun–Dec 2006 Jan–Jun 2007 Jun 2007 – Sep 2008
Related talk/archives Anime and manga (index) Hello! Project (1) Pokémon (index, PAC (1, 2), PAC 2) Sumo (1, 2, 3) Square Enix (index) Tokusatsu (index) Trains (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
Search the archives:
V·T·E

Secular Shrine Theory is currently listed as having multiple issues including incomprehensibility. Can we do a review of it to see what it's current state is now that I have substantially reworked the article? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secular Shrine Theory has many maintenance templates that date back to a much older version of the article. Can we remove them now? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like some help with File:Moss types at the Ginkakuji garden, Kyoto, Japan (Paul Mannix).jpg, an image with a lot of mosses labelled in Japanese. Just transcribing the labels is fine too.

Artoria2e5 🌉 07:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They all appear to be labelled in katakana, so it should be simple to just directly reference a katakana chart if you don't know it and generate the names. Canterbury Tail talk 12:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I usually dodge any botany/biology questions. So, I've just quickly typed down the kana names & Hepburned transcriptions as best I can read/extrapolate them (some names have lost their -goke/"-moss" ending to koke/moss), then you can probably easily copy/paste/search-help yourself, since you are presumably not per se afraid of "outlandish" (CJKV) writing systems by a glance at your user page.

Ginkaku-ji no taisetsu na koke

(cut off) キャラハラッ..., kyarahara(small tsu/sokuon)...	ヒロハヒノキゴケ, Hiroha-Hinoki-goke	アラハシラガゴケ, Araha-Shiraga-goke (either duplicate or one of the two has an invisible appendix)	(can't make sense of this one, and it's cut off) (?) ゴキンシゴケモ..., Gokinshi-goke-mo...	カモジゴケ, Kamoji-goke	チャボスギゴケ, Chabo-sugi-goke	ウマスギゴケ, Uma-sugi-goke	オオスギゴケ, Ōsugi-goke
(empty)	ヒノキゴケ, Hinoki-goke	(empty)	(unmarked)	ヤマゴケ, Yama-goke	ハマキゴケ, Hamaki-goke	ミヤマスギゴケ, Miyama-sugi-goke	スギゴケ, Sugi-goke
(empty)	ホソバシラガゴケ, Hosoba-Shiraga-goke	コックシサワゴケ, Kokkushisawa-goke	(unmarked)	アラハシラガゴケ, Araha-Shiraga-goke	ビロードゴケ, Birōdo-goke (at least non-botanically, "Birōdo" is veludo if you [want to] know Portuguese, velvet if you don't)	ホウライスギゴケ, Hōrai-sugi-goke	コスギゴケ, Kosugi-goke

(Semantic hyphenations/capitalizations are mine on the fly from general, but strictly non-botanic experience for readability for "Romans" who are beginning to learn to read "Centralese" or ancient island periphery derivations thereof, but not systematic by any general, Wikipedia, let alone possible biologist transcription conventions which I'm ignorant of.) --Asakura Akira (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asakura Akira thanks a ton!!! I should be able to figure out the rest on my own. Cheers. Artoria2e5 🌉 14:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Artoria2e5 Erratum/Addendum on passing by: After a second look (thinking that the ゴ/go is actually a コ/ko with some soil on it) and a quick online search of my own (still botanically ignorant), the middle top one might possibly be コキンシゴケモ[ドキ] Kokinshi-goke-mo[doki] which is given as Ditrichum heteromallum (Hedw.) E.G.Britton by [1]. If that makes any sense for biologically more experienced eyes, you might want to change the description. Leave the question mark to be on the safe side. --Asakura Akira (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist painting has a name that might be too vauge and refer to a specific Northeast Asian tradition. Can someone look over it and confirm that this is the right title or propose a title change? Immanuelle (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current title is an exact translation. I don't see any need to move it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated USS Missouri (BB-63) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 02:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sei whale for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 02:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think Draft:Sect Shinto is ready for mainspace, can we move it there? MaitreyaVaruna (changing name to Immanuelle) please tag me (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is ready for mainspace. You seem to have machine translated the article from Japanese Wikipedia, and as a result it is incoherent in many places (like your previous work at Secular Shrine Theory). I think such articles need to be rewritten from scratch by someone who can read the original sources, and perhaps incorporate some English-language references too. — Goszei (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike Secular Shrine Theory there are actually ample English language references happily, so I will work on revising the article with them MaitreyaVaruna (changing name to Immanuelle) please tag me (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Osami Nagano#Requested move 9 April 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all! Recently, I have been noticing that on many articles about recently deceased individuals, some users have changed the date format from mdy to dmy, despite the fact that an overwhelming majority of these articles were created using dates in the mdy format. MOS:DATEFORMAT states that unless there is strong national ties to an English-speaking country, the date format should stay with what the first major contributor (often the page creator) used. As such, I have reverted these changes every time I see them. However, these changes have happened so many times (on Shinji Mizushima, Norihiro Inoue, Toshiya Ueda, Mia Ikumi, Akira Takarada, and most recently Minori Matsushima to name a few) that I wanted to make sure I am justified in reverting these edits each time. Link20XX (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: You are correct in reverting them. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Template talk:Country data Ryukyu#Requested move 16 April 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]